Adding a Dose of Honesty to the Congressional Job-Creation Debate

The House’s $75 billion jobs bill was intended as a holiday gift to out-of-work voters, but transportation reformers were less than thrilled with lawmakers’ decision to mimic the first stimulus law’s use of outmoded funding formulas to send three times as much money to roads as to transit.

hartford_train_station.jpgHartford’s Union Station, above, is in line for a viaduct reconstruction if Connecticut wins federal high-speed rail aid. (Photo: AZooNY.com)

In an op-ed for the Hartford Courant yesterday, Congress for the New Urbanism president John Norquist gave voice to those recent misgivings from sustainable transport advocates. Norquist wrote:

When it comes to the largest spending item in the bill — $27.5 billion in highway spending — Main Street is missing.

The $27.5 billion isn’t targeted to rebuild streets at the heart of
older cities and towns, the cherished settings for Memorial Day parades
and holiday light displays. No, the money will primarily go to projects
that government knows best —the expansion of wide, motor-vehicle-only
highways that go hand-in-hand with energy-wasting sprawl.

Norquist cited the value of retrofitting "small towns like Guilford, older suburbs like West Hartford, or bigger cities like New Haven" to accommodate mixed-use development as an alternative to traditional, road-centric stimulus spending.

And he’s undeniably correct on the big picture — that economic recovery money can best be allocated by a federal government nimble and innovative enough to recognize how transportation intersects with housing, health care, energy, and even tax policy. But is the existing system equipped to do that? Let’s do a quick year-end review:

  • Legislation authorizing $4 billion in transit-oriented development grants and formally creating the Obama administration’s inter-agency Sustainable Communities office has yet to move forward.
  • The House’s six-year federal transportation bill, which would only begin the arduous process of leveling the playing field between road projects and multi-modal plans that include transit and land use, remains in limbo two months after it was once expected to pass.
  • Cities both big and small have been left in the cold by the economic recovery push, thanks to lawmakers’ decision to direct funding through state capitals where budget-balancing and parochialism often took precedence over urban-area priorities.
  • The first stimulus law’s $8 billion pot of money for high-speed rail could well amount to little more than a drop in the bucket for the Connecticut communities Norquist noted in his column. Today’s Courant reported that the state is moving away from its initial $880 million rail proposal to a more moderate request of less than $100 million, focused mainly on Amtrak track upgrades. 

And the prospects of progress in 2010 may be slim, especially if red-state Senate Democrats succeed in postponing climate change debate and the next six-year transport bill continues to languish.

So as reasonable as Norquist’s critique may be, it’s worth asking first whether Washington is prepared to embark on the environmentally friendly, fiscally responsible, long-term rebuilding effort he proposes. The answer, unfortunately, is not yet.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

America’s Least Wanted Highways

|
The Congress for New Urbanism released a highly entertaining top ten list today: the North American highways most in need of demolition. At the top is Seattle’s Alaskan Way Viaduct, a structurally damaged elevated highway that, if removed, would free up 335 acres of public land by Elliott Bay. New York’s Sheridan Expressway, which traverses […]

Back to the Grid: John Norquist on How to Fix National Transpo Policy

|
How can federal policy encourage walkable street networks instead of highways and sprawl? Image: CNU The news coming out of Washington last week jacked up expectations for national transportation policy to new heights. Cabinet members Ray LaHood and Shaun Donovan announced a partnership to connect transportation and housing policy, branded as the "Sustainable Communities Initiative." […]

Final Stimulus Bill Slaps Transit Riders in the Face

|
The final tally is in, and we now have a breakdown for transportation funding in the stimulus bill that President Obama will sign, barring some unforeseen turn of the screw. Via Transportation for America: $29 billion for highways and bridges $8.4 billion for transit $8 billion for high-speed rail $1.3 billion for Amtrak To compare […]

Stimulus Bill Is a Step Forward for Pedestrians, Cyclists & Cities

|
Within the $27.5 billion allocated for "highways" in the stimulus bill signed by President Obama yesterday, there is some good news for pedestrians, cyclists and cities. I spoke with Michelle Ernst, staff analyst at the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, to get a sense of how the new legislation compares to the 2005 federal transportation bill, known […]

Wiki Wednesday: Better Stimulus Through Highway Removal

|
We know plenty of states want to use stimulus funds to expand highway capacity, but how many are looking to jolt their economies with a much-needed freeway teardown? So far as we can tell, the answer is none. Perhaps they should reconsider and take a page from this week’s StreetsWiki entry on highway removal: Streetfilms […]