Boondoggle: Portland Takes a Step Backward

Oregon's widening of the I-5 Rose Quarter represents a reversion to the car-dependent policies of the past.

Interstate 5, leading toward Portland. Oregon plans to widen the highway through the Rose Quarter.
Interstate 5, leading toward Portland. Oregon plans to widen the highway through the Rose Quarter.

In this year’s installment of its annual “Highway Boondoggles” report, Gideon Weissman of Frontier Group and Matthew Casale of U.S. PIRG Education Fund deliver a stark warning about the billions of dollars states spend on unnecessary highways that fracture our cities, deprive transit of scarce funds, and pollute our environment. Below is the eighth of nine installments detailing case studies of these harmful roadways: Portland’s I-5 Rose Quarter widening, an expensive highway project would constitute a step backward to the car-dependent policies of the past. 

Portland has made bold moves toward becoming a good place to get around without a car. New funding will soon create further bus-rapid-transit routes. The Oregon city has a widely used bike-share program. The city has plans to remove parking spaces and use the space for new bus, streetcar, and bike lanes. Portland has also set a goal of 25 percent of trips to be made by bicycle by 2030, and from 2000 to 2015 the share of people who commute by bike increased from less than 2 percent to 7 percent. 

Riders enjoying the benefits of Portland's bike-share system. Photo: PBOT/Flickr
Riders enjoying the benefits of Portland’s bike-share system. Photo: PBOT/Flickr

But even as Portland shifts toward a safer and more sustainable transportation system, the state is planning a $450 million project to widen and add lanes to I-5 through Portland’s Rose Quarter. The project would raise the number of lane-miles of freeway in the project area by 50 percent, with extra-wide shoulders that could fit an even higher-capacity freeway in the future. If built, the project will mean more driving, more pollution, and a step backward for the city.

According to the state, the project is needed because of poor safety, high congestion and poor street-level service for bicyclists and pedestrians. But there is little evidence that the first two needs will be served well by the project. The local advocates and official city advisers who have long pushed for better streets argue that street-level plans are inadequate and outweighed by the adverse effects of a bigger highway. 

Project documents claim that I-5 in the Rose Quarter “experiences some of the highest vehicle crash rates in Oregon.” Yet, according to Oregon Metro, a regional government agency, the state has not proved that the section of road in questions is unsafe, and has not provided “information on how the project area compares for serious crashes.”

Indeed, other ODOT highways in Portland have higher crash rates. Metro also notes that the state has not explained how the project “will reduce the number and severity of serious crashes occurring.” The state’s crash analysis cites driver behavior as a primary factor in all crashes, but as Metro writes, it is “not clear how the design solutions in the Build Alternative will address behavior.”

Portland's Rose Quarter, site of a planned highway expansion. Image: Google Earth
Portland’s Rose Quarter, site of a planned highway expansion. Image: Google Earth

When it comes to the goal of improving traffic flow and freight traffic, the strategy for expanding I-5 through the Rose Quarter is to fix what has been termed a “bottleneck.” But according to local think tank City Observatory, Portland’s own history of fixing an I-5 traffic bottleneck exemplifies why the strategy is likely to fail. After a nearby 2010 project to widen I-5 between Lombard Street and Victory Boulevard, the widened highway simply delivered “more traffic, faster, to the next bottleneck in the system.”

As a result of changes to traffic flow, congestion (along with the crash rate) actually rose. A better solution for reducing congestion along I-5 could be congestion pricing, which an ODOT study concluded could lead to “major improvements in travel times.” Despite ODOT’s own finding, the agency does not appear to have seriously considered pricing as an alternative to the widening project.

On the streets around I-5 in the Rose Quarter, improvements for walking and biking are badly needed. But proposed plans for city streets have been criticized for being inadequate improvements for those on bike or foot. Portland’s official walking and biking advisory committees both oppose the project. 

Portland’s Bicycle Advisory Committee wrote that “the Build Alternative would fail to achieve the stated project goals and objectives, especially in critical areas related to bicycling, but also including the resulting conditions for walking and transit. . .”

City Observatory noted that the “freeway widening project creates a bike- and pedestrian-hostile environment” in which wider turning radiuses would encourage faster vehicle speeds through crosswalks.

Metro observed that the “width of Broadway between Williams and 1st is shown as five (5) one-way motor vehicle lanes, which is incompatible with a multimodal, mixed-use environment, and may increase poor driver behavior.”

Local groups like Bike Portland have challenged the street-level alterations included in the I-5 project, which make up just a small fraction of total costs, as being used by the Oregon DOT for “green-washing, bike-washing, and safety-washing yet another massive investment in automobile-oriented infrastructure.” 

An expanded highway will also likely cause more carbon emissions, hindering Portland’s ability to achieve its emission reduction goals. ODOT’s own environmental assessment actually projects that the project will result in slightly reduced emissions compared to a “no build” option.

Yet an analysis by City Observatory found the opposite, estimating the project will raise annual greenhouse-gas emissions by 4,700 to 7,900 tons as a result of more driving. Local researchers have noted they are unable to assess the validity of ODOT’s findings, because the state has not made underlying traffic data available.

Portland has set a goal of reducing carbon emissions by 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050, and a corresponding objective of reducing per-capita vehicle miles traveled by 30 percent by 2030. The proposed I-5 expansion would make it harder to achieve both goals.

Even as the Oregon Department of Transportation seems to be overstating the ability of expanding I-5 to achieve its transportation goals, the agency seems to be understating its environmental impacts. At a public hearing, critics of the project presented evidence that ODOT failed to fully account for increases in traffic and pollution that would result from the project.

Sponsored post: Spin and Better Block Foundation are calling on designers, urbanists and anyone who cares about safe and livable streets, to submit ideas for a new generation of multimodal parklets. Winning designs will get built and installed in Denver in September. Let’s take back our streets from cars, one space at a time. Apply now:

11 thoughts on Boondoggle: Portland Takes a Step Backward

  1. Not sire how you came to that conclusion Jonathan. That photo is I5 northbound south of Portland right before I-205 splits off to the west.

  2. No existing highways should be widened until all existing lanes are priced to reduce congestion.

  3. Wow. Can you imagine what half a billion dollars could buy for clean transportation for Portland?

    It could purchase a $1,000 electric bike for every man, woman, and child in Portland.

    Or it could buy a 1,000 new, all-electric buses for the city.

    If my family of 3 lived in Portland, we sure wouldn’t want $3,000 of our tax dollars going to widen a stretch of road. Invest that money instead in street trees or in barriers for protected bike lanes or something that would make the city more beautiful.

  4. Actually, you widen this bottleneck and you just deliver more cars to Delta Park more quickly, where they pile up short of the bridge. It doesn’t actually fix any problem. That area of town needs congestion pricing. I think a lot of Portlanders – and especially Vancouverites – would pay it instead of sitting in traffic.

  5. It’s interesting how Streetsblog labels just about any highway project a “boondoggle” but never transit projects that might fall into that category. California HSR, the Transbay Terminal and Central Subway project in San Francisco come to mind.

    Giving a pass to bloated, poorly thought out and poorly executed transit projects isn’t doing anyone any favors.

  6. I agree today Boondoggle is a loaded word that loses its meaning.

    HSR is needed to reduce CO2 emissions and reduce need to expand roads and airports.

    Financing will always be a Boondoggle for any project costing billions where an individual is permitted to file a lawsuit delaying it without punity.

  7. Just another freeway-widening project after all the smoke and mirrors is over. $405 M in federal money is the main motivation. ODOT and PDOT are engaged in a power struggle for future planning.

    All of the successful transformations of cities to people-friendly traffic design needed radical redesign of the major arterial flow, which is a long-term process, more so in the US with the interstate highways.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Portland’s CRC Highway Project Is Dead — And Buried

We’ve said it before, and it gives us great pleasure to say it again: Portland’s Columbia River Crossing highway megaproject is dead. And this time it appears the project is finally, definitely deceased. Oregon lawmakers adjourned this week without authorizing funding for the $3 billion-plus bridge and highway widening project. Last year, it looked like […]

How Ohio’s Focus on Highways Suffocates Transit

What would it take to make transit a more appealing option in the greater Cleveland-Akron area? That question was posed to one of the area’s leading transportation officials recently. His answer didn’t focus on a big new project. Jason Segedy, head of Akron’s metropolitan planning organization, said the first step should be to start doing the […]

Portland Mega-Highway Backers Resort to “Rebranding”

We’ve seen this trick from MySpace — in modern marketing parlance, they call it “rebranding.” Jonathan Maus at Network blog Bike Portland reports that Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber continues to push the Columbia River Crossing boondoggle — a $4 billion sprawl generator — but he’s wrapped it in a sanitized new package. Maus thinks the strategy is a […]