Highway Boondoggles 2019: Nine Projects That Should Never Happen

Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits.

The North Houston Highway Improvement Project will expand already vast swaths of highway
through the middle of Houston, displacing homes and businesses and dividing communities.
Image: Texas Dept. of Transportation
The North Houston Highway Improvement Project will expand already vast swaths of highway through the middle of Houston, displacing homes and businesses and dividing communities. Image: Texas Dept. of Transportation

In the fifth edition of the landmark “Highway Boondoggles” report, Gideon Weissman of Frontier Group and Matthew Casale of U.S. PIRG Education Fund deliver a stark warning about the billions of dollars states spend on unnecessary highways that fracture our cities, deprive transit of scarce funds, and pollute our environment. Below is a summary. Check back for each of nine installments detailing case studies of these harmful roadways.

America’s car-dependent transportation system is dangerous, harms our communities, and is the leading source of global-warming pollution. America needs to invest in healthier, sustainable transportation. Yet, year after year, state and local governments propose spending billions on new or expanded highways that often do little to reduce congestion while diverting scarce funding from infrastructure repairs and transportation priorities. Highway Boondoggles 5 finds nine projects slated to cost a total of $25 billion that will harm communities and the environment while likely failing to achieve transportation goals.

Highway expansion costs billions, driving agencies further into debt, while failing to address our long-term transportation challenges.

Expansions are expensive.

  • In 2012 (the latest year for which data is available) federal, state and local governments spent $27.2 billion on highway-expansion projects – sucking money from road repair, transit, and other needs.
  • From 2008 to 2015, highway debt nearly doubled, from $111 billion to $217 billion.
  • New roadway is costly to maintain. The average lane mile costs $24,000 per year to keep in good repair.2

Expansion doesn’t solve congestion.

  • Expanding a highway sets off decisions that can lead to the highway becoming congested again. Since 1980, the nation has added more than 800,000 lane-miles of highway – paving more than 1,500 square miles – yet congestion is worse than in the early 1980s.

Expansion damages the environment and our communities.

  • Highway expansion fuels more driving and climate change. In 2017, transportation was America’s number-one source of global-warming pollution.

Highway expansion can also force the relocation of homes and businesses, widening “dead zones” alongside highways, severing street connections for pedestrians and cars, and reducing the tax base.

A look back at five projects from past reports shows the consequences of boondoggle projects and the benefits of rejecting them.

  • In 2018, local groups stopped a plan to add toll lanes along I-275 through a neighborhood in Tampa Bay, Fla. Now, the community is thriving, and even reducing traffic capacity on local roads to improve walking and biking.
  • After years of devoting scarce dollars to unnecessary roads, Ohio found itself in a deep budget hole. Even with new fees and taxes, the state is falling billions short on fixing aging roads and funding transit.
  • For years, Wisconsin’s reckless highway spending strained budgets. But in 2018, then-governor Scott Walker cancelled a boondoggle project and announced his support for a “fix-it-first” spending strategy, dedicating modest new funding for transit and local infrastructure maintenance.
  • The Dallas Trinity Parkway would have run alongside the Trinity River. Local opposition stopped the project – and now Dallas is planning parks and open spaces.
  • Before the closure of Seattle’s Alaskan Way Viaduct highway, critics suggested that the wait until the opening of an expensive highway would see horrible commutes and traffic jams. Instead, most traffic melted away.

Federal, state and local governments should stop or downsize unnecessary or low-priority highway projects. Policy-makers should:

  • Invest in solutions that reduce the need for costly and disruptive highway-expansion projects. Public transportation, changes in land-use policy, road-pricing measures, and technology can help drivers avoid peak-time traffic.
  • Adopt fix-itfirst policies that reorient funding from newer highways toward repair of existing roads, bridges and transit.
  • Use the latest transportation data and require full cost-benefit comparisons, including future maintenance, to evaluate all proposed and expanded highways.
  • Give priority funding to projects that reduce growth in vehicle miles traveled.
  • Invest in better research and data collection to track shifts in how people travel.

States spend billions on new or expanded highways that fail to address transportation problems and that create problems for communities and the environment.

The “Complete 540" project in Raleigh, NC, would pave over dozens of acres of wetlands and destroy habitat forthreatened mussel populations. Image: North Carolina Dept. of Transportation
The “Complete 540″ project in Raleigh, NC, would pave over dozens of acres of wetlands and destroy habitat for threatened mussel populations. Image: North Carolina Dept. of Transportation

This year’s boondoggles projects include:

  • Complete 540; North Carolina; $2.2 billion: North Carolina’s plan to complete a highway around Raleigh would generate sprawl while destroying wetlands.
  • North Houston Highway Improvement Project; Texas; $7+ billion: This project would displace residents and destroy businesses, while sucking billions from transportation priorities.
  • High Desert Freeway; California; $8 billion: L.A. County’s first new highway in 25 years would lead to more driving, pollution and sprawl.
  • I-75 Widening; Michigan; $1 billion: A needless widening project would exacerbate sprawl and harm communities.
  • Tri-State Tollway Widening; Illinois; $4 billion: The Tri-State Tollway outside Chicago has been widened twice yet suffers from heavy traffic. The Illinois Tollway still is moving forward with a $4 billion expansion.
  • “Connecting Miami” Widening Project; Florida; $802 million: Florida is widening I-395 and SR836 in Miami, highways that divide communities. Local groups have identified better ways to benefit neighborhoods, including improving transit or even converting I-395 to a boulevard.
  • I-83 Widening; Pennsylvania; $300 million: Pennsylvania touts the widening as a way to improve traffic flow, but documents show that congestion is not a problem and that resources would be better spent on reducing crashes and accident response.
  • I-5 Rose Quarter Widening; Oregon; $450 million: In Portland, a highway project would constitute a step backward and would likely fail to improve safety compared with other investment strategies.
  • Interstate 81 Widening; Virginia; $2.2 billion: Virginia argues the widening is necessary for safety, yet recently increased speed limits along the route. Operational improvements would be a cheaper and more effective way to improve safety.

Check back at StreestblogUSA all week for detailed stories on each of the above boondoggles. 

10 thoughts on Highway Boondoggles 2019: Nine Projects That Should Never Happen

  1. On a related note, creating boulevards isn’t the best solution either. Maybe it’s more aesthetically pleasing to remove them (Central Freeway and Embarcadero Freeway in SF) but at the end of the day the cars themselves aren’t disappearing. They are simply clogging surface streets instead. At least at the city level, it takes a combination of massive transit investment and transit-oriented development, plus incentives for companies to set up near transit, than simply removing a freeway.

  2. You forgot I-11 in Arizona! AZDOT is proposing a new freeway parallel to I-10 through the edge of Saguaro National Park, destroying a wide swath of natural Sonoran desert, and encouraging Tucson’s sprawl to cross a mountain range…

  3. Hopefully these freeways are built and many more to come. Articles like this are just flat out ridiculous. I will keep my car and my freeways as will 80 percent of the population. Stop intruding on peoples lifestyles, especially the majority’s.

  4. Then Campbell you and your short sighted kind can flip the multi-billion dollar price tags yourselves. Sorry but I am not responsible for paving a freeway to your front door.

  5. I invite the writer of this article to travel down I-81 in Virginia. It’s a death trap that needs immediate attention. There is a consensus among most Virginians this project needs to be completed, not one specific group or another. You should do a little more research on these projects and base your conclusions on facts rather than pre-conceived notions.

  6. I’m thankfully most DOTs are smart enough to see past the dead horse this group is trying to beat.

    Every single one of these projects is needed badly to reduce congestion and improve mobility.

    I’m willing to bet these writers have never traveled on 90% of these highways.

    Get off the freeways if you have issues with them.

    And this climate change claim is a boondoggle itself.

    These website and organization is a boondoggle that screams it. Sorry, but it’s called growth. Get over yourself.

    Almost no DOT would listen to your politically driven agenda because it’s filled with poor and false arguments that die quickly as construction permits are issued, and projects are approved for funding.

    Organizations like this deserve to be ripped apart and exposed of its lies and deceitfulness trying to hinder badly needed projects. It’s a politcally driven, bias organization with an agenda with nothing better to do with its time.

  7. I drove the Tri-state tollway a couple of times last week for two trips to Indiana. I just did not see the need for an expansion project. That’s just money down the toilet. They’ll spend $4 billion and still have massive traffic jams every single day. It simply won’t make a difference. The IL Tollway system is spending tons of money on expansion projects that simply don’t need to happen. The NW Tollway expansion was completely unnecessary. The highway needed to be rebuilt, but it didn’t need to be expanded. I drive it often to Chicago and I can’t figure out why there are three lanes in each direction.

  8. I don’t think cars are going to decrease any time soon around my area as the independent spirit runs free. I think cities might be best to financially incentivise the ownership of more enviromentally friendly cars, like hybrids and completely electric cars.

    I’ve looked into buying hybrid limos for my business (Sioux City Limo) as I try to be a environmentally conscious proprietor. Thanks for the news and the opportunity to comment and express myself.

  9. If the money that is used to expand these highways that will constantly be congested was put into a more efficient public transportation like a light rail for example; we would be increasing economic output by providing a quicker way from the home to the workplace. Obviously cars will not be going anywhere anytime soon because too much money is invested in oil but if these expansion projects are developed then we are only encouraging the use of vehicles as our only option of transportation. Public transportation projects that are Danny deVETOed by parties who have stake in the oil, rubber, and highway industry are we are only hurting overall economic growth and reinforcing the retirement accounts of those making millions off of these highway expansion projects. Let’s look at this as an opportunity to make long term environmentally conscious decisions that will help future generations rather than provide a temporary solution for us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *