The European Answer to School-Drop-Off Chaos

Photo:  Sciennes Primary School
Photo: Sciennes Primary School

Now here’s an elegant solution to the school drop-off problem: A growing number of European cities simply prohibit cars on the streets surrounding schools at the start and end of the school day.

The concept is called “school streets,” and it started in Bolzano, Italy in the early 1990s. Since then, school streets have spread from Austria to the U.K, according to the European Local Transport Information Service — and collision rates involving school children has decreased by half. About 45 percent of students in Bolzano walk to school every day, according to ELTiS.

School Streets are marked with signs indicating the restricted hours. Fifteen minutes before school begins and for 15 minutes after it lets out, “school guides” — the European equivalent of crossing guards — place painted wooden signs signs at the streets blocking traffic, ELTiS.

Other European cities are seeing the benefits.

Two years ago, Edinburgh completed an 18 month “School Streets” trial at 11 schools. Data showed it produced a big drop in traffic: 3,179 fewer vehicles traveled the streets around the schools during a survey. Meanwhile, traffic was increased on surrounding streets by just 920 vehicles. Overall the experiment produced a three percent increase in the number of students walking to school and a six percent decrease in children being driven to school, the Scotland Herald reported.

Vienna recent moved to make its school streets permanent after a six-month pilot improved safety and increased walking and biking among students.

WavingChildren
Photo: Hackney Council

Meanwhile, in East London, School Streets have been implemented at five schools. At Millfield’s Community School in Hackney, teachers say the strategy also improves air quality for children. And parents say they like it.

Obviously Europe is very different from the United States, but the arrangement is not unheard of here either. Today, when I was walking home from dropping my son off at daycare, I passed a street in Cleveland where through-traffic is restricted by a school. The crossing guard was out placing cones in the street just like this.

  • jcwconsult

    Yes, listening to the “free money” pitches from two of the top for-profit ticket camera companies.

    Speed cameras are NEVER deployed to have most drivers reduce speeds below their safe and comfortable levels because it would cost too much with almost no offsetting ticket revenue.

    Opinion polls can get almost any result desired, if the questions are phrased cleverly enough. Votes tell the true beliefs and ticket cameras have lost 37 of 41 public votes. Note that many states make ticket cameras illegal to use to avoid the predatory for-profit ways they are actually deployed. Bills to bring them to Michigan in 2013 were defeated by the opposition from the Police Officers Association of Michigan, the ACLU, the Campaign for Liberty, Abate, the Mackinac Center think tank, the judges association, the National Motorists Association, skeptical editorials in both major Detroit newspapers, and others.

    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Kyle

    You conveniently ignored or dismissed Mr. tomwest above. Speed limiting via posted signs is a red herring in this conversation. Even if all your claims of 85th speed and “for profit rackets” of speed enforcement are true, there’s no reason why we can’t reduce driver speeds by road changes, or in your words “re-engineer roads.”
    As scary as re-engineering roads sounds, narrowing lanes via a new coat of paint is not exactly a huge cost.

    A clear question for you. An arterial has an actual 85th speed of 45 mph and a posted limit of 45. You could narrow the actual 85th speed down to 35 mph, simply by repainting narrower lanes. The 10 mph speed reduction would give pedestrians and cyclists a much higher chance of survival if involved in a collision. So WHY wouldn’t you?

  • Sincerely

    You guys really are a fringe group.

  • NJ SRTS

    NJ Safe Routes to School video of how Fair Haven, NJ closes 3rd street during school hours for kids to bike to and from school, Fair Haven, NJ – Third Street Community Connection

  • Kenny Easwaran

    When I lived a block and a half from a school in Los Angeles, I learned that even on days when my business at the university was done at 2, I should never try to bike home around 3 – for several blocks around, both sides of every street were lined with vehicles with parents in the car waiting to spy their kid and pull out.

  • FormerMainer13

    Interesting, and thanks for sharing. I guess I live in an area where parents dont’ drive their kids to school at such rates

  • jcwconsult

    I got your long reply, though it never showed up here. For schools on higher speed arterials and collectors with actual 85th speeds in the range of 40 to 45 mph – how to protect the kids?

    The article said: “In response, the city put in “School Zone” signs with flashing lights that indicate a lower speed limit of 20 mph during school hours.” JCW – 1) This is part of the correct solution and “school hours” are 30 to 60 minutes before & after school, plus lunch hours IF kids are allowed off the school grounds. These limited hours will be far more respected than leaving the lights flashing at 10 am and 1 pm when drivers know that every kid is required to be in the building. 2) Officer ticketing is greatly preferred over camera bills sent in the mail weeks later to vehicle owners who may not have been the drivers, which have no consequences of points on drivers licenses, and which do not have interactions with an officer to explain and discuss the violations. Note that with the restricted hours, it should be possible to have officers pretty frequently. 3) Add crossing guards wherever significant numbers cross and educate kids to cross arterials & collectors at those locations.

    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Bernard Finucane

    The idea of having student crossing guards seems inherently dangerous to me.

  • 1 Less Car

    Around here, the hysteria is high on abductions. To put it in perspective, if a child tells there parent that a man stopped his vehicle to talk to them, the police are called and a sketch is made. Heaven forbid you were a concerned parent asking if the kid was ok. Now your sketch is on Nextdoor and on facebook and the police want to “question” you. I saw this just a few weeks ago.

    I live in a neighborhood that is literally bordering a school. Parents will drive the 6 blocks to pick up there kid and it’s a madhouse. I don’t mind. I just ride my bike pass them and laugh. But the sad thing is, these kids grow up being used to being driven everywhere. Even in a town that has one of the lowest crime rates int he country.

  • Sincerely

    Why are signs noting a lower speed limit during school hours part of the solution if motorists don’t obey speed limits?

  • jcwconsult

    If the restrictions are brief and reasonable, they get pretty high compliance. When they are obviously predatory for-profit rackets, they don’t. Overall and in many different scenarios, when traffic laws respect the normal and safe driving behavior of the vast majority of motorists, voluntary compliance is high.
    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Sincerely

    So if the speed limit was lowered to 20 mph on the retail/residential corridor near my home for the two miles or so leading into downtown, motorists would comply because it’s “brief and reasonable”? Sounds like the city should move ahead with that.

    I’m really curious how you define “normal and safe,” since a few minutes on any road I’ve ever been on would show those terms to be incompatible.

  • jcwconsult

    There is a HUGE difference between a school zone that drivers will respect, and a normal area of commerce that does not justify an artificially low limit.
    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Sincerely

    So you’re saying drivers can recognize the need to drive slowly near a school when it is made blatant, but they are unable to recognize when a pedestrian-heavy urban environment warrants slower speeds no matter what kind of notice is given? What is it that prevents that?

  • jcwconsult

    The very restricted hours for a school zone and the particular vulnerability of kids will get the respect of most drivers. Artificially low limits on arterials & collectors that are not necessary do not.
    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • Jesse

    When my Dad was stationed in Bremerhaven, Germany the 6th graders were the crossing guards for the rest of the elementary school, you would be assigned a week at a time with a partner, this was 1989-1992 when we were there. No problems at all.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

“Safe Routes” Goes Global With the Model School Zone Project

|
This post is part of a series featuring stories and research that will be presented at the Pro-Walk/Pro-Bike/Pro-Place conference September 8-11 in Pittsburgh. To get to Seoul Gumsan Elementary School in South Korea, students have to cross a heavily trafficked road with a blind curve. Between 2009 and 2010, 89 children were injured and one killed in 86 traffic […]

4 Things Schools Can Do to Reduce the Asthma Threat From Idling Cars

|
Lately, American schools have been pretty responsive to public health and safety threats facing children. Witness the rise of peanut butter bans or the dwindling number of vending machines in schools. But schools haven’t been very successful at tackling what is arguably a much bigger threat to children’s health: air pollution caused by driving. Asthma is the most […]

September Brings “Back to School” Jump in Traffic Congestion

|
Why do traffic delays jump in September? Obviously, fewer people are on vacation. But it’s not just commuters back to the grind getting to and from work. It’s parents dropping their kids off at school, often with even less forgiving start times than an adult workday. Region Forward, a DC-based livability partnership, shows that the […]