Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Transit

D.C. Metro Seeks Better Service, Fare Cuts to Stop Ridership Death Spiral

The beleaguered D.C. Metro hopes to increase service, especially at rush hour, and partially reduce fares as part of a $20 million effort to check the breathtaking ridership decline — a plan that transit advocates have been demanding for years to improve service in the nation's capital.

The proposed budget expansion — which still requires government funding — calls for expanding rush-hour train frequency until 10 a.m., and for an additional hour-and-a-half in the evenings, till 8:30 p.m. Some observers have called this this "happy hour train," meant to serve young professionals weekday schedule, which sometimes includes afterwork socializing.

The agency also proposes adding to the number of traincars it runs at rush hour, which will help with overcrowding.

In addition, the plan calls for no fare increases and proposes a reduction in weekend fares to a flat $2. It will also reduce the price of one- and seven-day passes.

The agency also proposes expanding its service guarantee program. Riders who experience a delay of 10-minutes or more at rush hour would also be eligible for a fare refund under the proposal.

The proposal to increase service hours has been welcomed by most advocates, but some have criticized certain aspects of the plan. For example, Ward 6 Councilman Charles Allen pointed to possible equity problems with increasing service only at rush hour for the professional class and not restoring late-night service.

Others said the weekend fare decrease was unlikely to reverse weekend ridership declines on its own.

I'm not sure what potential riders who aren't taking metro for $3/$4 on the weekend are going to come back for $2 rides with the same headways

— Dan Donnelly (@DanTweetedThat) October 29, 2018

The plan comes on the heels of some of the worst performance among major cities for D.C. Metro, which has been plagued with mismanagement and safety problems, culminating with the 24-hour emergency shutdown of the whole system in 2016. The agency has shed 16 percent of its riders since just 2015, according to data compiled by Yonah Freemark at the Transport Politic.

Metro's board faced broad criticism earlier this month when it appeared to be balking at service increases that might restore ridership. According to NBC's Adam Tuss, the additional service hours would cost about $20 million; Metro wants local governments to pick up the tab.

The changes will be discussed over the next two months and would require the approval of the eight-member Metro board.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

One Structural Change Could Shift Everything About How Transportation Works in America

The so-called "highway trust fund" is disproportionately funded by gas taxes generated on non-highway roads — and those local priorities never get their money back. Is it time for a change?

June 2, 2025

In New York, Pols Want to Require Helmets for Teen E-Cyclists

Helmet laws remain controversial — they're the "common-sense" approach pushed by lawmakers who ignore that studies show they don't improve safety.

June 2, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Dig Deep

Why don't cities build subways anymore? The cheap method is unpopular, and the less disruptive method costs too much.

June 2, 2025

Chaos in Chicago as State Pols Adjourn Without Funding Transit

Meanwhile, transit officials are facing the possibility of massive service cuts and layoffs.

June 1, 2025

Friday Video: Are Driverless Big Rigs a Good Idea?

What will automated trucks really mean for America?

May 30, 2025

Friday’s Headlines Have a Future

But these freeways shouldn't, according to the Congress for New Urbanism.

May 30, 2025
See all posts