Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

Today on the Streetsblog Network, member blog Riding in Riverside sets out to explode the myth of the "wundercar" -- a vehicle powered by sustainable fuels that will allow us to hold onto our driving lifestyle and all its accoutrements, while saving the planet and feeling "green."

That kind of futuristic fantasy isn't going to solve our problems, writes the blog's Justin Nelson. The answer, he argues, lies instead in older patterns of development and mobility:

3936973020_bc1a9152e6.jpgThis is not an environmental silver bullet. (Photo: bindermichi via Flickr)

[E]ven if we were to devise a perfect car, one made out of recycled tiresand printer paper, one that harnesses photosynthesis to not only becarbon-neutral, but actually make energy from atmospheric C02, even ifwe could make a car with no direct environmental impact, it would stillbe an environmental and social disaster. Our waterways are contaminatedby engine fluids and lubricants that run off of road surfaces. Ournatural groundwater tables are falling because rainwater is unable topenetrate pavement.

Cars still allow sprawling development that eats upwild lands and spits out bland suburbia. Species' ranges in the fewprecious areas of wilderness that we have are disrupted by highways. Wewould still live in a society where we shut ourselves off from oneanother in our own private boxes, promoting inequality and a lack ofrespect for shared humanity. We would still leave our inner cities todangle. Our streets would still be unsafe places for children to play,and we would still kill thousands every year in automobile crashes.Alternative fuels are, on a perfect day, a solution to only a few ofthe myriad problems that cars cause.

On the other hand, insteadof pursuing unproven technologies in a desperate last-ditch attempt tohang on to the way of life we've been living for the last 50 or soyears, why don't we look ahead and try to build a better world.… Instead of a risky gamble to maintain a failinglifestyle, we should spend our resources on forging a bright futurebased around principles of city-building as old as cities themselves.

Also today on the network: The WashCycle on the importance of snow removal if bikes are to be useful as transportation. Next Stop STL on the annoyance of loud music on public transit. And The Naked City on the growing debate over the megaregions concept.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Are Bigger and Beautiful-er

There's a lot of bad news in the Big Beautiful Bill — but it also may have helped kill a major highway expansion in Oregon.

July 9, 2025

Removing ‘Rainbow Crosswalks’ Won’t Make America’s Arterials Safer

Secretary Duffy wants to tackle dangerous arterials. So why is he coming after rainbow crosswalks most often seen on narrow city roads?

July 9, 2025

The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Is About Our Transportation Future, Too

Transportation didn't get a lot of mention in the public discussion of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But it's everywhere.

July 8, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines of Many Colors

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy called rainbow crosswalks "a distraction" and called on cities to eliminate them.

July 8, 2025

Form-Based Codes Mean More Sustainable Cities

New research shows that prioritizing building "form" over their use leads to more sustainable cities.

July 8, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Are Big and Beautiful

The ginormous GOP tax and spending bill President Trump signed on July 4 will make the air dirtier, a lot of it from tailpipe emissions.

July 7, 2025
See all posts