Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Buses

Wins For Washington (State): Transport Bill Resolves Two Local Debates

Tucked into the transportation spending bill that Congress approved over the weekend are two wins for Washington state's senior senator, Patty Murray (D), who chairs the upper chamber's transport budget-writing panel.

2003992830.jpgSen. Patty Murray (D-WA) (Photo: Seattle Times)

Murray's first victory deals with Bush-era rules for charter buses that barred local transit agencies from providing cheaper service to special events, such as sports games or local concerts.

The charter bus rules, written to help give private companies a leg up over publicly funded transit, have adversely affected Minnesotans and D.C. residents, among others. But next year's transportation spending bill gives a particular pass to the transit agency in King County, WA, allowing the company to continue its bus service to Seattle Mariners games.

Murray's Senate version of the spending bill ended the charter bus rule "in the state of Washington," but the final version of the legislation used less specific language: An exemption was given to "any transit agency who during fiscal year 2008 was both initially granted a 60-day period to come into compliance with [the rules], and then was subsequently granted an extension."

In a statement to the Post-Intelligencer newspaper, Murray cheered the local rollback of the bus transit rule:

This rule has gotten between fans and an affordable, convenient way toget to games in our region. My provision will not only restore Metroservice on game days, it will help reduce congestion throughout thecity. Especially now, as our economy struggles, we can't stick fanswith steep fares and sub-par service on their way to support our localteams.

The moral of the story: It's good to have a transit advocate in the Senate Democratic leadership.

But Murray's second victory could apply beyond her home state. The final transport spending bill preserves language she crafted that would require the federal government, when calculating matching funds for a project that combines multiple modes (e.g. roads and transit or ports and transit), to consider the entire local contribution.

Murray's move was aimed at boosting the prospects for the transit portion of the Columbia River Crossing, which recently had its $4 billion-plus price tag cut amid high-level criticism of its highway lane expansion.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Guess Which Argument Can Get a NIMBY To Change Their Mind About New Housing

Put your instincts to the test with this fascinating experiment about the power of messaging to win support for urbanism.

March 20, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Took the Road Less Traveled By

And that has made all the difference, when it comes to preventing traffic deaths.

March 20, 2026

Study: How Ambiguous Definition of ‘Major Transit Stop’ Creates Wiggle Room for Municipalities

This is a story of how well-intentioned efforts by the state to tie new development to transit hinge on how local governments (with their own incentives) interpret broad state law.

March 19, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Growing St. Louis’s Arts and Culture District

This week on Talking Headways, step inside St. Louis's Grand Center Arts District with the people who make it happen.

March 19, 2026

Advocates Get D.C. Mayor To Release Buried Report On The Potential Benefits Of Congestion Pricing

How many other conversations about congestion pricing across the country are being suppressed — and how many have never even gotten started?

March 19, 2026
See all posts