It Gets Worse: Boxer/Inhofe to Request $50B More for Highways

Barbara Boxer and infamous global warming denier James Inhofe will present an amendment to the Senate stimulus plan that could funnel as much as $50 billion in additional funding to highways, Streetsblog has learned. Friends of the Earth tells us that Boxer’s staff confirmed she will introduce the amendment, which could bring the total for highways close to $80 billion, exactly the figure Inhofe demanded last week in a letter to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. 

The amendment is expected within the hour, according to Kate McMahon of Friends of the Earth. Inhofe press director Marc Morano didn’t deny the number, but said "a lot is going on today and I’ll confirm with you shortly."

Both Friends of the Earth and Environmental Defense are sending action alerts to their activists, the first suggesting calls to Boxer, the second urging constituents to contact their own Senators to demand a "No" vote on the amendment.

Stay tuned for more information.

EDF action alert here.

Friends of the Earth action alert:

The U.S. Senate is working on its economic stimulus package today. Already,
the bill includes $27 billion that can be used to build unnecessary new roads,
despite the fact that such spending will create fewer jobs than investments in
clean transportation projects. New roads will also lead to more global warming
pollution and oil consumption.

Last week we had a victory in the House
of Representatives when we increased funding for clean transportation by $3
billion. Unfortunately, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is threatening to undo that

Senator Boxer is planning to propose an amendment today that
would add another $50 billion in new road funding to the stimulus. Such an
amendment would undermine President Obama’s goal of a "green" stimulus and
represent a huge setback in the fight against global warming.

We need
your help to change Senator Boxer’s mind. Please call her office NOW at
202-224-3553 and ask her to NOT offer this amendment.

10 thoughts on It Gets Worse: Boxer/Inhofe to Request $50B More for Highways

  1. Does anyone else find it ironic that Senator Boxer is the same legislator that fought so hard for CA to be able to improve CAFE standards?

  2. Let’s look at the numbers:

    $29.6 billion: gas tax revenue for 2008

    $27 billion: new roads in current stimulus bill

    $50 billion: Boxer/Inhofe addition to above

    $87 billion: total for new roads if they get their way

    The last number is almost three times the first one. Wouldn’t it make more sense to just triple the gas tax?

  3. “This is classic ‘please don’t hurt me’ liberalism at it’s absolute worst.”

    There are reasons I’m not a Democrat. Among other things, they are the party of vested, privileged interests. And the Republicans are the party that’s in favor of partying to sell out the future.

    So when they cut a deal, you end up selling out the future to favor vested interests.

    Under capitalism you get what you earn, at least in theory, and under socialism you get what you need, at least in theory. But our politics has devolved into feudalism — those with privileges expand them in good time and keep them in bad times, whether they need them or not, deserve them or not.

    If this is what government is, I want my money back. In particular, I want my federal money back — or my children’s federal money back, since they will be in no position to decide to fund transit instead of autos, because they will only be funding debt service.

  4. By the way Streetsbloggers, what’s the difference between a highway and a street?

    Bicycles can ride on streets, and pedestrians can cross them. Not so highways. Remember, virtually all of that federal money has gone to highways.

  5. Babs, what are you thinking? California is choking itself to death with cars and sprawl, and you want to build more freeways.

  6. All because she doesn’t want to read some Inhofe quote in her press coverage tomorrow.

    Wait a minute. This woman is chair of the Environment Committee?

    Only Nixon could go to China, and apparently only Barbara Boxer can sell out environmentally-friendly transportation. This is Subaru-wagon liberalism at its worst.

  7. Highways are owned and maintained by the state, streets are locally owned, in general. Some local streets (if they have a route number) are also state owned. (Ashby Ave. in Berkeley is State Route 13).
    Boxer is usually better than this. One has come to expect this sort of policy from closet Republican Dianne Feinstein, but Boxer? What is she on?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Urgent Action: Oppose Highway Robbery in Senate Stim Bill

Stimulus debate continues today in the Senate, where the stale ideas keep on coming. In addition to the $50 billion highway slush fund floated by Senators Boxer and Inhofe (no vote on that one yet), Missouri’s Kit Bond plans to offer two amendments that would rob from transit, rail, and green transportation to pay for […]

Update on Stimulus Action in the Senate — Keep Up the Pressure

The latest word from DC is that Kit Bond’s pro-highway/anti-rail amendments have yet to come to the floor, while the Inhofe/Boxer amendment to create a $50 billion highway slush fund is still being finalized by its authors. The phone calls and emails are having an effect — Boxer felt enough pressure to adjust her amendment, […]

Wiki Wednesday: The Story of the Stimulus

Looks like the conference committee made quick work of the stimulus bill, with Harry Reid announcing that a deal has been reached much sooner than expected (perhaps a bit too prematurely). We’ll have the specifics on transportation funding later tonight or early tomorrow. For now, relive the stimulus saga with StreetsWiki. Contributor DianaD has added […]

The Boxer/Inhofe Amendment: Not Green Enough

A revised draft of the Boxer/Inhofe amendment just came over the transom from a source in DC close to the negotiations (PDF).  This is a draft from yesterday and negotiations are ongoing, so expect changes.  Specifically, enviros are trying to get a "green screen" put in place, so that USDOT can pick from the priority […]