Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Talking Headways

Talking Headways Podcast: The Public Works Director for Democrats

U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen on the Trump administration's recent guidance for stripping sustainable projects of funding, and why he thinks active transportation advocates should focus on safety.

This week on Talking Headways we’re joined by U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen of Washington state, the top Democrat on the House Transportation Committee.

We chat about U.S. DOT’s recent guidance for stripping sustainable projects of funding and why active transportation advocates should focus on safety.

Scroll down below the audio player for an edited excerpt of our conversation, or click here for an unedited, AI-generated transcript of the entire conversation.

Jeff Wood: So what’s the way to combat this? What is the way to push back? What would you say to the folks who are waiting for their grants to come in, who are frustrated by this and then they see what’s happening in other parts of the country and other subject matter where Congressional intent is being ignored and there’s a lot of fear out there about what’s going to actually happen with their money.

Rick Larsen: When we just think about competitive grants and bike and ped infrastructure, I think the focus should be on, sadly, the national epidemic of highway and roadway deaths. Over 40,000 people died in 2023 from roadway and highway deaths. Some of that is car-on-car, truck-on-car and so on.

But about 20 percent of those deaths are related to bike and pedestrian accidents as well. And so to address this issue of this national epidemic of highway deaths and preventable deaths, it would seem wise to invest in sidewalks to give people a safer place to walk, to invest in a separation to get bikers a safer place to bike — and cars the assurance that they don’t have to worry about sharing that road with the biker, because there is an investment to separate the two. It’s not about equity and it’s not about the environment and it’s not about green infrastructure. It’s about saving lives and preventing deaths.

That’s the first thing I would point out and I would point out to the administration — that taking this approach is actually going to result in infrastructure being built. That is not actually safe for people to use. That I hope is an argument that would work. If it doesn’t, I don’t know what’s going to work with these folks, but preventing deaths and saving lives by investing in sidewalks, by investing in bike separation, it seems to me a logical step to take.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

The Talk of D.C.: Rumors Flying that Trump Admin Wants to Undo Bike Lanes in Capital

The feds appear to be mounting an argument that bike lanes cause congestion in the nation's capitol — and advocates are bracing for a fight.

January 26, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Fund Transit (Mostly)

A federal transportation bill keeps most of the funding for transit from the Biden administration's infrastructure act, except for steep cuts to intercity rail.

January 26, 2026

New York State’s Car Insurance ‘Affordability’ Pitch Will Shortchange Crash Victims

Gov. Kathy Hochul's Uber-backed bid to make car insurance affordable hides harmful policies for victims of car drivers.

January 25, 2026

Big Tech is Secretly Behind NY State’s Auto Insurance Rate Cut Push

Is Uber really interested in a more affordable, safer New York?

January 25, 2026

Friday Video: Why The Latest Wave of E-Bike Restrictions Are So Stupid

New Jersey just set a new standard for over-reaction on e-bikes by passing a victim-blaming law. Here's why no state should follow suit.

January 23, 2026

Friday Video: The Fight to Expand A South Carolina Freeway … For Bikes

Greenville is looking for the good kind of induced demand — by expanding a popular rail-trail.

January 23, 2026
See all posts