Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Talking Headways

Talking Headways Podcast: The Public Works Director for Democrats

U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen on the Trump administration's recent guidance for stripping sustainable projects of funding, and why he thinks active transportation advocates should focus on safety.

This week on Talking Headways we’re joined by U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen of Washington state, the top Democrat on the House Transportation Committee.

We chat about U.S. DOT’s recent guidance for stripping sustainable projects of funding and why active transportation advocates should focus on safety.

Scroll down below the audio player for an edited excerpt of our conversation, or click here for an unedited, AI-generated transcript of the entire conversation.

Jeff Wood: So what’s the way to combat this? What is the way to push back? What would you say to the folks who are waiting for their grants to come in, who are frustrated by this and then they see what’s happening in other parts of the country and other subject matter where Congressional intent is being ignored and there’s a lot of fear out there about what’s going to actually happen with their money.

Rick Larsen: When we just think about competitive grants and bike and ped infrastructure, I think the focus should be on, sadly, the national epidemic of highway and roadway deaths. Over 40,000 people died in 2023 from roadway and highway deaths. Some of that is car-on-car, truck-on-car and so on.

But about 20 percent of those deaths are related to bike and pedestrian accidents as well. And so to address this issue of this national epidemic of highway deaths and preventable deaths, it would seem wise to invest in sidewalks to give people a safer place to walk, to invest in a separation to get bikers a safer place to bike — and cars the assurance that they don’t have to worry about sharing that road with the biker, because there is an investment to separate the two. It’s not about equity and it’s not about the environment and it’s not about green infrastructure. It’s about saving lives and preventing deaths.

That’s the first thing I would point out and I would point out to the administration — that taking this approach is actually going to result in infrastructure being built. That is not actually safe for people to use. That I hope is an argument that would work. If it doesn’t, I don’t know what’s going to work with these folks, but preventing deaths and saving lives by investing in sidewalks, by investing in bike separation, it seems to me a logical step to take.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Talking Headways Podcast: Getting California High Speed Rail Done

It took a while, but California is figuring out the best, most-cost-effective way to do fast trains.

October 30, 2025

Spooky Stuff: On Halloween, Some States Will Have Deadlier Roads Than Others

Find out how yours ranks — and what policymakers can do to make streets less scary.

October 30, 2025

Who Are Thursday’s Headlines For?

Non-drivers still perceive streets as being for cars even when they have bike lanes. And that's because, in many cases, they are.

October 30, 2025

An Olympian Task: Replicating Paris’s Bike Boom in Los Angeles

The Olympics can help transform the streets of Los Angeles  — if they look to the example of Paris.

October 29, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Are a Clear and Present Danger

Rescinding the "endangerment finding" could not only exacerbate climate change, it could also throw entire industries into chaos.

October 29, 2025

What’s More Regressive: Modest Driving Surcharges to Help Fund Transit, or Forced Car Ownership?

Do Illinois state senators and reps really want to make the financial burden on their constituents less "regressive"? If so they can start by ensuring that as many people as possible can live their lives without spending $12,000 annually just to leave their homes.

October 28, 2025
See all posts