Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Biden Harris

Biden Decries US DOT’s Destruction of Black Communities — But Will His Administration Make Reparations?

The concrete supports for Charleston’s Interstate 77, a downtown highway, which were built on land that was formerly home to more than 240 predominantly Black families. Image: Harry Schaefer via Wikimedia Commons

President Biden was hailed this week by some antiracist transportation advocates for calling out federal highway projects for destroying Black communities — and then lost points by failing to call for reparations to the people harmed by those federal projects.

In a memorandum about his administration's plans to reverse housing discrimination released on Tuesday, Biden touched on how government transportation and housing polices worked together to created "legacies of residential segregation and discrimination [that] remain ever-present in our society":

The creation of the Interstate Highway System, funded and constructed by the federal government and state governments in the 20th century, disproportionately burdened many historically Black and low-income neighborhoods in many American cities. Many urban interstate highways were deliberately built to pass through Black neighborhoods, often requiring the destruction of housing and other local institutions.  To this day, many Black neighborhoods are disconnected from access to high-quality housing, jobs, public transit, and other resources.

The federal government must recognize and acknowledge its role in systematically declining to invest in communities of color and preventing residents of those communities from accessing the same services and resources as their white counterparts. The effects of these policy decisions continue to be felt today, as racial inequality still permeates land-use patterns in most U.S. cities and virtually all aspects of housing markets.

As part of the Federal Highway Act of 1956 to which Biden refers, the federal government put up 90 percent of the cost of interstate highway projects, heavily incentivizing states to use eminent domain to raze what they deemed "slum" neighborhoods to make way for the new asphalt, in a process cruelly termed "urban renewal."

In virtually every city that took advantage of the program, low-income communities of color were specifically targeted for "slum" clearance, displacing families and destroying one of their most important forms of intergenerational wealth. Residents who remained in the area adjacent to the new highway face increased rates of serious pollution-related health conditions and poverty to this day.

But despite those words about the federal government's record of racial injustice, the regulatory actions outlined in Biden's order focused exclusively on "examining the effects" of Trump-era housing regulation rollbacks, rather than on calling for meaningful action at the USDOT itself.

To some advocates, that felt like a glaring omission.

"The White House memo failed to even mention the department and program that allowed those highways to be built," said Beth Osborne, director of Transportation for America. "The Department of Transportation should provide guidance and tools that communities need to bridge or remove those highways and should work with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to identify ways to ensure these neighborhoods remain affordable for current residents once such an improvement is made."

Transportation for America is among the advocacy groups that have called for bolder action from the federal government to begin the work of repairing the racist legacies of the urban renewal era. In December, the groups called on the next administration to establish a $5-billion fund that could help states remove their downtown highways and establish community land trusts for the benefit of neighboring residents.

The Senate Transportation committee is already considering a similar initiative as part of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's sprawling Economic Justice Act. The Restoring Neighborhoods and Strengthening Communities Program — known among advocates as the “Highways to Boulevards” program — would devote $10 billion to removing urban highways in regions with a high concentration of low-income residents or residents of color; the same pot of funding would be eligible for use in establishing community land trusts, but could also be spent in other ways.

Some advocates of the bill were hopeful that Biden's memorandum at least signaled that the administration understands the role that transportation reform must play in creating a more just society, even if the president didn't make that reform a focus of the recent order. (Biden’s nominee for Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, has also acknowledged the racial injustices wrought by previous DOTs, including at his Senate confirmation hearing and on his Twitter.)

"It's encouraging to see the president, after only a week in office, acknowledge the racist legacy of the Interstate era and the damages these highways still cause to Black and Brown communities today," said Ben Crowther, program manager for Congress for the New Urbanism, which helped to write the bill. "Now, there's an opportunity to repair this damage by removing the highways that for too long have created barriers to quality housing for those who live around them."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Take Me to the River

Politico reports that the Biden administration is investing $2.5 billion in updating aging Mississippi River locks and dams like this one in Iowa. Transporting freight by barge produces less emissions than trucks or even rail.

July 12, 2024

Friday Video: Take a Spin on Boston’s Electric Cargo Bike Share

Can't afford a $7,000 Urban Arrow cargo e-bike ? In Boston, you can now rent one for just a few bucks.

July 12, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Electrify the Rails

Adrianna Rizzo of Californians for Electric Rail on California's looming lobbyist-fueled hydrogen train mistake: "We’re locking in low service for potentially decades."

July 11, 2024

Thursday’s Headlines Drive Less

Seems obvious that the more people drive, the more likely they are to die in a crash or kill someone else, but traditional thinking on traffic safety doesn't always follow that logic, according to Planetizen.

July 11, 2024
See all posts