Congress Vows to Fight Trump’s Environmental Rule Change

Congressional leaders are bracing for a fight with the Trump administration over changes to the environmental review process.

The White House could exclude climate change from new infrastructure projects in a revision of a 50-year-old environmental rule this week. Image: J. Daniel Escareño
The White House could exclude climate change from new infrastructure projects in a revision of a 50-year-old environmental rule this week. Image: J. Daniel Escareño

The Transportation Research Board’s 99th Annual Meeting will be held in Washington, D.C. from Jan. 12-16, 2020. Click here for more information.

Congressional leaders vowed they won’t let the president get away with gutting environmental laws after learning the Trump administration will scrap requirements to consider the climate consequences for new highways and pipelines.

A White House council is expected on Wednesday to announce revisions to the 50-year-old National Environmental Policy Act that would advise federal agencies to ignore the effects of climate change during reviews of new infrastructure projects.

House Democrats, who arrived back on Capitol Hill on Monday after a two-week holiday break, blasted the president’s plan to circumvent environmental review and are discussing several options to deter the White House.

“Pretending like our climate isn’t changing is reckless and costly,” House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Peter DeFazio told Streetsblog. “Not only is removing these requirements a bad idea for public health and our environment, but it will end up costing taxpayers more when projects aren’t built to be resilient.”

Some members of Congress said they would fight the administration’s changes by adjusting permitting requirements in the next iteration of the surface transportation bill, which expires in September, or add riders that appropriate money for the consideration of climate change.

California Rep. Mark Takano said Trump’s plan would hinder efforts to protect communities from environmental disasters and vowed that Congress would use “several tools at its disposal to fight” it.

“This is a short-sighted plan that will affect the resiliency and sustainability of our infrastructure projects – our roads, our bridges, and our buildings should be prepared to withstand the challenges climate change will continue to create,” Takano, who is also co-chairman of the Future of Transportation Caucus, told Streetsblog. “Our goal should be to mitigate the impact of climate change on our communities, but this Trump proposal will only exacerbate the crisis.”

The change is the president’s latest environmental rollback, which total nearly 100 in the last three years. Trump had previously weakened rules that reduced air pollution in national parks, revoked California’s ability to set stricter fuel economy standards, and repealed a requirement that states monitor tailpipe emissions on federal highways, among other changes.

Under the White House Council on Environmental Quality revision, federal agencies would not have to study cumulative effects of climate change when evaluating projects. This proposal would enable infrastructure projects to proceed more quickly through the review process without having to disclose how much waste or emissions would be emitted and how susceptible projects are to rising sea levels.

But the consequences of ignoring the effects of a rapidly warming planet are deadly. Infrastructure projects like highways and bridges would not need to show how resilient they would be in the wake of a “hundred-year” flood or a tropical storm, even if they were built near wetlands.

The issue comes up when roads are washed out by hurricanes and there are questions about how it should be rebuilt,” Sabin Center for Climate Change Law director Michael Gerrard told Streetsblog. “If you’re building a highway or a runway or rail line you want to be sure it will still be above water at the end of its useful life. Disregarding climate impacts could lead to a colossal waste of money and a disruption of transportation service.”

Environmental groups worry that weakening the regulations would allow developers and energy companies to harm communities without any scrutiny. Advocates had used the environmental rules to stymie projects in court by showing the Trump administration had not adequately considered the effects of climate change in its reviews. A lawsuit seems almost inevitable.

“If the administration does certain rule making that pushes beyond the boundaries beyond what the law permits, this will result in a legal maneuver or a court case quickly,” Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program fellow Adie Tomer told Streetsblog.

States could also enact stricter environmental review laws if the Trump administration loosens its regulations since federal rules do not pre-empt state and local rules.

“State laws are stand alone laws and the bluest states already have strong environmental reviews laws for projects which they have jurisdiction,” Gerrard said.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Environmental Reviews: Helpful (and Hurtful) to Many Ideologies

|
Writing at the Heritage Foundation’s blog, Nick Loris says that the White House’s pending decision on whether to consider climate change in federal environmental reviews amounts to "more green tape." San Francisco’s newest bike lanes: made $1 million pricier by environmental reviews. (Photo: Streetsblog SF) Citing Republican senators’ concerns that existing National Environmental Policy Act […]

Transport Contractors Urge White House to Revamp Enviro Review Rules

|
The trade group representing private-sector transportation contractors is urging the Obama administration to change the way environmental reviews are conducted for infrastructure projects, proposing to favor "categorical exclusions" (CEs) from federal review rules over the lengthier process of measuring the environmental impact of construction work. Environmental reviews added an estimated $1 million to the cost […]

New GOP Bill Would Bar Enviro Reviews from Considering Climate

|
Republicans on the Senate environment committee, who months ago began criticizing the Obama administration for evaluating federally funded infrastructure projects for their impact on climate change, today introduced legislation that would bar the White House from making climate a factor in environmental reviews. Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), one of the new NEPA bill’s sponsors, holds […]

Will Big Highway Projects Have to Consider Climate Change?

|
Since 1970, the National Environmental Protection Act has required federal agencies to consider the impacts of their projects on air, water, and soil pollution — but not on climate change. Until recently, carbon dioxide, which causes global warning, wasn’t classified as a pollutant and so couldn’t be regulated under environmental laws. The EPA in 2009 […]