Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Koch Brothers

Koch Brothers-Backed Group is Behind Assault on Phoenix Light Rail

A mural celebrates Phoenix’s plans to extend light rail into South Central. Photo: Valley Metro

Dark-money out-of-state oil interests are bankrolling a ballot referendum that would quash Phoenix's popularly supported plans to build a light rail network, new documents help confirm.

This month, Phoenix voters will be asked to overturn Prop 104, which was approved overwhelmingly by Phoenix voters in 2015 to generate billions toward a regional system of light rail. Prop 105, up for vote Aug. 27, would instead divert the money to road projects.

But, according to records uncovered by the local alternative weekly newspaper, the Phoenix New Times, the group behind the new ballot measure is no a rag-tag team of south side business owners — as they have portrayed themselves. They are receiving funding and instruction from groups with ties to the  billionaire oil industrialist Koch Brothers.

Many observers — including Streetsblog — have suspected the attack on transit, like similar efforts in Nashville and other cities, was tied to the Koch Brothers massive political network.

New emails obtained by reporter Steven Hsieh show that Prop 105 was coordinated behind the scenes by Scot Mussi, president of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, a dark money group.

That "club" is a 501(c)4 nonprofit, meaning it doesn't have to disclose its donors. But in 2017, the group received $110,000 in funding from a political arm of Charles and David Koch, according to opensecrets.org, a political transparency nonprofit. That was about a fifth of the organization's total annual budget. The watchdog group Energy and Policy Institute, calls the Arizona Free Enterprise Club a "front group" that works to undermine political support clean energy in the state.

An email exchange between Mussi and the face of the opposition — a local small business owner named Celia Contreras — shows Mussi was revising and editing the language for Prop 105. Emails also shows Mussi was directing the signature-gathering effort. The organization used paid signature gatherers to collect the needed 20,000 signatures to introduce the ballot measure, offering $5.68 per signature, Hsieh reports.

A map of the planned light rail Phoenix voters approved overwhelmingly in 2015. Map: MovePHX
A map of the planned light rail Phoenix voters approved overwhelmingly in 2015. Map: MovePHX
A map of the planned light rail Phoenix voters approved overwhelmingly in 2015. Map: MovePHX

Contreras, who owns a modest auto repair shop on South Central Avenue, and other businesses local business owners began their campaign last year after learning plans for South Central Light Rail would reduce the street with from four lanes to two. She believes the change would jeopardize her small business.

But Contreras told the New Times that when dark money outfits got involved and turned their concern into a larger assault on light rail citywide, their effort was tainted.

"They just used the businesses," Contreras told the New Times. "They don’t care about us."

She said she has not been involved with the group — which calls itself "Building a Better Phoenix" — since October.

Prop 104, the original pro-transit measure, passed in 2015 by an overwhelming 10-point margin. It raised the sales tax by 0.3 percent to build $31 billion in light rail lines and expand bus service, both to the south and west.

Only one, 28-mile light rail line has yet been constructed, and it has been the focus of the region's smart growth efforts. Five additional expansions would be halted if voters vote "yes" on 105 and the hot, fast-growing region would be left with almost no alternative to driving for decades to come.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Talking Headways Podcast: Behind the Mayor’s Desk

Anthony Flint of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy shares a global perspective on mayors and the challenges that connect cities around the world.

May 1, 2025

The Highway Shakedown, Part Two: What Locals Lose When Road Funding Isn’t Distributed Fairly

While lawmakers fight to defend America's "user-pay" road funding system, both federal and state policies have not provided locally owned roads with a fair share of their users’ tax contributions. It's time to change that.

May 1, 2025

Trust Fund Babies: Advocates Argue House-Proposed EV Fee Won’t Solve Highway Funding Woes

An EV fee might make a dent in America's staggering transportation bills — but until the highway network stops growing out of control, it won't help for long.

May 1, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Take It To the Grave

A Republican leader is proposing new fees on cars to replace lost gas taxes. But the real reason the feds are running out of highway money isn't EVs, it's an addiction to road-building.

May 1, 2025

Highway Shakedown: How Local Road Users Are Subsidizing State Highway Investments

States across America are breaking the "user-pay" promise. A new report argues it's time to change that.

April 30, 2025
See all posts