Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

CA Voters Reject Measures With Lots of Highway Money and a Dash of Transit

A highway and transit package in San Diego that was opposed by environmentalists was defeated. Photo: BikeSD
A highways-and-transit package in San Diego was opposed by environmentalists and didn't muster the votes needed to pass. Photo: BikeSD
false

On Tuesday night, voters approved major transit improvement plans in Los Angeles, the Bay Area, Atlanta, Indianapolis, Raleigh, and Seattle.

There were other types of transportation measures on local ballots -- they focused on highway expansion and lumped in transit funding as a secondary consideration. TransitCenter reports that in California, highway-centric packages didn't have the same appeal as transit-focused ballot measures:

Consider California. While Measure M (the huge Los Angeles transit plan which does include a few highway projects) and Measure RR, the BART repair/maintenance measure received thumbs up from voters by strong margins, transit funding in Sacramento and San Diego was shot down in the polls.  In both regions, the transit projects were tacked onto measures promising big bucks for highways.

San DiegoSan Diego County’s Measure A was rejected 56-44, well short of two-thirds approval.  The sales tax increase would have funded a proposal by regional planning organization SANDAG, with 41% of $18 billion slated for transit. Enviros, transit supporters and the city of San Diego opposed the highway emphasis, and are now calling for an overhaul of SANDAG itself.

SacramentoSacramento County’s Measure B saw a closer vote, needing two-thirds but netting just 65%. The proposal would have raised $3.8 billion, with only 25% the measure dedicated to transit. The rest would have gone to road maintenance and expanding the Capital Connector Freeway. The measures was supported by planners, city governments and the county, but the road projects and the challenges Sacramento has faced in deploying transit service that is useful to people may have reduced enthusiasm and momentum for transit.

We should note that Charleston, South Carolina, voters did approve a half-cent sales tax raising $2.1 billion, with more than half the revenue earmarked for highways, but also providing $600 million for transit and $200 million for parks.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The Urbanist reports that the city of Seattle has officially lowered speed limits on its residential streets to 20 mph. Architect this City talks about living in a "bubble" and the cultural divide that help produce Donald Trump. And Bike Portland shoots down the idea that freight traffic would somehow necessitate 19-foot traffic lanes on an important local bridge for biking.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Monday’s Headlines Don’t Go Small

How is transit that only moves a few people at a time that different from personal cars, except at public expense?

January 13, 2025

New Studies Show No Downsides for Bicycle ‘Idaho’ Stop

As more states continue to pass laws allowing bike riders to treat stop signs like yield signs, more studies showing their safety benefits accumulate.

January 10, 2025

“It Was Magnificent”: Lessons From Berlin and Munich Transit Systems

Last month, a delegation of Illinois state representatives visited Germany to tour transit systems in and between two major cities. Here's what they learned.

January 10, 2025

Alarming Report Shows that Two Auto-Braking Systems Can’t See People in Reflective Garb

The safety strips are useless in the eyes of automatic braking systems on two very popular car models.

January 10, 2025
See all posts