Will State DOTs Follow Through on Their Goals for Zero Traffic Deaths?
State DOTs aren't known for setting ambitious street safety goals. They're usually more interested in moving traffic than saving lives. But it looks like that's starting to change as states follow the lead of the federal government's "Toward Zero Deaths" initiative, which itself was inspired by the spread of Vision Zero campaigns among cities. Even states like Ohio are saying their goal is zero traffic deaths.
This is a new development and the jury is still out on these campaigns. Many agencies seem to be counting on self-driving vehicles to come to the rescue instead of committing serious resources to proven measures like street redesigns to calm traffic. But others appear to be taking the responsibility to ensure public safety a lot more seriously.
In Oregon, Jonathan Maus at Bike Portland is encouraged by the state DOT's new "Transportation Safety Action Plan," which sets the goal of zero deaths by 2035. Maus says the difference compared to previous safety plans is palpable:
The plan never refers specifically to “vision zero” -- the moniker adopted by 21 cities nationwide (including Portland) -- but it unequivocally states that the Oregon Department of Transportation will work toward zero deaths by 2035.
This is a significant shift since 2011. The new plan mentions “zero” in regard to fatalities and injuries over 30 times. The 2011 plan mentioned it only twice.
“Transportation crashes and resulting injuries have historically been considered by many as an inevitable consequence of mobility,” reads the executive summary. “However, more recently this idea has been challenged as countries, states, and cities across the world seek to change safety culture and eliminate traffic fatalities and life-changing injuries entirely. The idea may be difficult to grasp initially, but when people are asked how many traffic fatalities are acceptable for their friends and family, the universal response is: ‘zero’.”
We also like the urgency in statements like this: “The development of the [plan] is an important step toward continuously changing the traffic safety culture in Oregon. It comes at a pivotal time as it is imperative to counteract the recent fatality increase.” It’s encouraging to see that ODOT is not ignoring the sobering spike in fatalities.
The plan also includes an entire section on the human impact of crashes with some frank language about the impact of road design on safety outcomes. "Unless we design our roads for the speeds that are appropriate within the land use and geographic contexts and the types of users expected, crashes will also continue as before."
Good stuff, but will Oregon DOT follow through? Maus notes that the specific recommendations for bike safety, for instance, aren't very exciting.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Cap'n Transit argues that attaching cheap parking to a transit or bike project can ruin the whole thing. And The Urbanist draws some conclusions from Uber's endorsement of the big $53 billion light rail measure in Seattle.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
How To Build a Car That Kills People: Cybertruck Edition
The Cybertruck represents a lot of what's wrong with the U.S. transportation system — even as it purports to address those problems.
Friday’s Headlines Don’t Feel the Need for Speed
Tell me again, which constitutional amendment is it that gives people the right to drive as fast as they want?
Komanoff: Congestion Pricing Fee Plan is Solid
Here’s what’s to like about the Traffic Mobility Review Board's central business district toll recommendations. It's a lot!
Talking Headways Podcast: The Sexy World of Bus Speeds
When you start to add up the numbers, you can see why agency leaders would be interesting in finding ways to reduce those costs.
Thursday’s Headlines See Daylight
Daylighting, or removing parking near intersections, is an often overlooked way to improve pedestrian safety.
