The Calgary Model: Connect Protected Bike Lanes Fast, Watch Riders Pour In

calgary fast facts
Graphic: City of Calgary. Click to enlarge.

pfb logo 100x22Michael Andersen blogs for The Green Lane Project, a PeopleForBikes program that helps U.S. cities build better bike lanes to create low-stress streets.

Last week, we shared a new report about the best practices for cities that want to make faster, cheaper changes to their streets.

Today, let’s take a moment to recognize the North American city that has used these tools better than any other to rapidly improve its bike infrastructure.

The city is Calgary, Alberta. The secret is that it piloted a connected downtown network of low-stress bike routes all at once.

calgary map 570
Downtown Calgary. Images: City of Calgary.

As the graphic at the top of the post shows, the effects have been large and almost immediate. Weekday bike counts on the affected corridors soared 95 percent in September 2015, three months after the network opened, compared to the year before. The proportion of those riders who were female jumped from 20 percent to 27 percent, and younger people are reportedly riding downtown more, too.

“It seems like we see a ton of families out riding the tracks,” said Tom Thivener, projects coordinator in the livable streets division of Calgary’s transportation planning department.

The all-at-once approach to the project was proposed by Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi.

As spring creeps back to the Canadian prairie, it’ll be worth watching to see if those numbers keep growing. Skyrise Cities reported last week that the pilot project lasts through December 2016.

Maybe most heartening: Calgarians say they like the projects. Despite a very close city council vote to create the network, once the public saw it in action, 64 percent decided they approve.

8th Avenue SW.

That’s the power of a connected low-stress biking network: Once people can easily get to many different locations on a bike, bike lanes stop being an abstract concept (“CARS VS BIKES”) and start being a functional, practical system.

Most cities are a long way from having a “minimum grid” of low-stress bikeways, as some people like to call it. That’s why a quick-build program, which rethinks bureaucratic procedures to make transportation projects faster, cheaper, and more flexible, can be so useful.

You can follow The Green Lane Project on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook or sign up for its weekly news digest about protected bike lanes.

27 thoughts on The Calgary Model: Connect Protected Bike Lanes Fast, Watch Riders Pour In

  1. winters are too cold in New York City to adopt the Calgary model

    the topographry is too hilly in LA to adopt the Calgary model

    it’s rains too much in San Diego to adopt the Calgary model

    roads are too narrow in Phoenix to adopt the Calgary Model

    There isn’t $6 million in the Dallas DOT budget to adopt the Calgary model

  2. Montreal does a thing which might make sense for the ‘too cold’ part.

    Major arterial bike lanes are year round, protected by a curb, and are even plowed, other ‘feeder’ lanes that are separated not by curbs but by paint become parking lanes in the winter, when their usage is nearly nil.

  3. Loss aversion is real. When people first hear of such a project, their immediate reaction is to the lost parking/street space. But once they see it in action, they notice how nice it is for everyone for cyclists to be separated from motor traffic.

    It’s odd to me how few drivers seem to see the benefits of getting cyclists (largely) out of “their” lanes. Or maybe they’re just less likely to speak out than the angry ones.

  4. winters are too cold in New York City to adopt the Calgary model

    Colder than Calgary? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Please tell me you were kidding.

  5. Yes, for those who are geographically challenged, I’ll point out that LA is mostly dead flat, San Diego has very little rainfall and the roads in Phoenix are insanely wide.

  6. Who is going to pay for “protected bike lanes”? These “special lanes” seem like “special treatment” If motorists brought up “protected motor vehicle only” lanes the bicycle advocate/lobby would be howling.

  7. Haha I love the “this can never happen here because we’re special snowflakes” excuses!

    The hilarious part is the absurdity of that “logic” knows no bounds. In SF we’ve even seen groups say “well that protected bike lane might be nice for that neighborhood but we’re SO different over here a mile away. It’ll never work here.” Lol.

  8. I have seen posts on a certain bicycle advocates facebook page where they want the highway speed limit lowered.

  9. Still too few lanes are cleared during winter basically only 2 or 3 downtown and that’s it. I’d like to see all the protected lanes cleared in the winter and other major ones.

  10. Why segregation ok when bicyclists bring it up, but a double standard when a motorist brings it up?

  11. You win for the most dense comment. All interstate highways are protected for autos and many other freeways and highways are as well. Moreover, many other roads are poorly designed to accommodate equally taxed cyclists who get no benefits commensurate. Your argument fails on multiple levels.

  12. Cyclists are not equally taxed! If all those motor vehicles you cyclists bash were banned, there would be a lot more people out of work, and industries destroyed, the unemployment rate would be astronomical. If bicycles were banned from the roadways there wouldn’t be much damage.
    The fact is, because a bicycle advocate says something, doesn’t necessarily make it true.
    Those so called interstate highways are protected for a reason! For YOUR safety. Motor vehicles are prohibited in much more places than a bicycle ever will be, so stop complaining, motorists bend over backwards to accommodate you ingrates.

  13. Unfortunately those “limited access highways” don’t go directly to my house.

  14. “Cyclists are not equally taxed!”

    You’re right. They’re effectively taxed MORE than drivers, because bike infrastructure is at least an order of magnitude cheaper than car infrastructure, and much of road construction comes out of general tax funds that cyclists and motorists pay for equally.

    If only we could get government to stop forcing cyclists to subsidize those darn mooching drivers!

  15. Who pays for protected walk lanes? Everyone does, the same way everyone pays for transportation infrastructure of nearly every kind.

  16. Most transportation cyclists are actually FOR segregation (in the form of dedicated bike lanes, especially protected ones). The cyclists against it are the hardcore, take-no-prisoners-in-the-war-against-cars guys, who are a small but loud minority of cyclists. If you look at places like the Netherlands where just about everyone bikes, cyclists generally keep to protected bike lanes where they exist and everyone is fine with it.

  17. Of course then there’s Japan, which has a far higher bike modal share than anyplace outside amsterdam and the like, and a ruthlessly practical and egalitarian bike culture, and yet has bugger-all in the way of bike lanes, protected or otherwise.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m a proponent of separate and protected bike lanes, especially if they come at the expense of car lanes and parking…. but there are many routes to success… ?

  18. Mostly Makes sense. Though the Netherlands plan would never work in the United States. The bicycle advocate in my state has that “take no prisoners” approach, and then they wonder why people are against them when they want to ram through bad legislation that doesn’t fix or prevent problems.

  19. Taking away parking & lanes doesn’t make motorists support bicycling, it is regressive & self sabotaging for bicycle advocates to be anti-motor vehicle. But the bicycle advocates don’t like to hear from people that don’t tow the line on their views & beliefs.

  20. The point is not to be “anti-motor vehicle,” but rather than the current configuration of roads is often actively harmful. Big wide roads with a zillion motor lanes are a significant problem in the U.S.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Falling Behind on Protected Bike Lanes? Blame Canada

“Something big is definitely brewing in Canada.” That’s the word from Michael Andersen at People for Bikes, which monitors Twitter for news on protected bike lanes around the English-speaking world. Vancouver’s investment in bike infrastructure paid off with a 64 percent spike in bike traffic from 2013 to this year. And Andersen says Canada as a whole has […]

Protected Bike Lanes Attract Riders Wherever They Appear

Michael Andersen blogs for The Green Lane Project, a PeopleForBikes program that helps U.S. cities build better bike lanes to create low-stress streets. Second in a series. The data has been trickling in for years in Powerpoint slides and stray tweets: On one street after another, even in the bike-skeptical United States, adding a physical […]