Skip to content

Two Very Different Ways Bike-Share Benefits Transit

A new survey [PDF] by researchers at UC Berkeley and published in Access Magazine sheds light on how bike-share systems interact with transit.
Depending on the nature of the city and its transit system, bike share can increase or reduce rail transit ridership. Image: Access Magazine
Bike-share’s effect on how people use transit depends on the context. Image: Access Magazine

A new survey [PDF] by researchers at UC Berkeley and published in Access Magazine sheds light on how bike-share systems interact with transit.

Researchers Susan Shaheen and Elliot Martin surveyed more than 10,000 bike-share riders in Montreal, Toronto, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, and Washington, DC. Like previous surveys have shown, Shaheen and Martin found that a significant number of bike-share users reduce car use. But their main focus was how bike-share affects transit use.

The effect of bike-share on transit travel habits varied according to the context. As you might expect, in areas with sparse transit, bike-share offers an important “last-mile” connection. In areas with dense transit networks, bike-share serves as more of a substitute for transit, relieving crowding on packed buses and trains.

People who live in urban cores with well-developed rail systems — like central D.C. — are more likely to substitute bike-share for transit. In these areas, Shaheen and Martin note, bike-share may offer a more direct, quicker alternative to the bus or the train — and that helps open up space on transit lines that need it most.

In DC, especially the core areas, bike share was likely to substitute for a transit trip. Map: Access Magazine
In DC, especially the core areas, bike share was likely to substitute for a transit trip. Map: Access Magazine

“By adding transportation alternatives, bikesharing opens up additional capacity on congested bus and rail lines in the urban core,” they write. “Indeed, one reason Capital Bikeshare was launched in Washington, DC was to relieve congestion on the subway system.”

The effect was different in Minneapolis-St. Paul, the region with the least developed transit system and most dispersed development patterns that the authors surveyed. There, 15 percent of bike-share users were more likely to use rail, compared to just 3 percent who were less likely.

At the time the survey was conducted in 2011, the region had only one light rail line. With a sparse rail network, providing a connection to the train becomes more of a core function for the bike-share system.

In Minneapolis-St. Paul, where transit connections were more scattered, people used bike share to reach the train. Map: Access Magazine
In Minneapolis-St. Paul, where rail service is sparse, a greater share of bike-share subscribers use the service to reach the train. Map: Access Magazine

In smaller cities with less developed transit systems, bike-share is more of a “last mile solution,” the authors concluded.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: RIP, The D.C. Streetcar

April 10, 2026

You’re Authorized to Read Friday’s Headlines

April 10, 2026

Review: ’60 Minutes’ Take On High-Speed Rail Ignored Facts And Offered Nothing New

April 9, 2026

Trump Wants to Slash Federal Funding for Public Transit, Rail (Again)

April 9, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines Are the Taxman

April 9, 2026
See all posts