Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Will Federal Oversight Help or Hinder DC Transit?

The feds have taken over safety oversight of D.C.'s embattled Metro, and that could actually be cause for concern, says David Alpert at Greater Greater Washington.

Will the Federal transit Administration impose service cuts on DC's Metro? Photo: Wikipedia
How much will the Federal Transit Administration disrupt DC Metro service to achieve its safety goals? Photo: Wikipedia
false

U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx laid out his vision for safety-related reforms under the aegis of the Federal Transit Administration in a recent piece in the Washington Post.

One person was killed when smoke filled a train earlier this year, and that's inexcusable, says Alpert. But the effort to improve Metro safety could backfire, he argues, if it entails overzealous disruptions to service:

There's particular reason to worry because the FTA has not behaved in the past like an organization that wants to help transit agencies. Instead, it's like a sword of Damocles hanging over each transit agency, ready to fall if the agency missteps.

FTA regularly behaves as though there's no problem with transit agencies running very little transit, yet spending huge dollars on expensive bureaucratic overhead. I'm sure not everyone at FTA feels this way, but the ultimate stance of the agency often ends up being that it doesn't matter if the transit gets run, only if every comma is in place on the forms.

Foxx seems to be saying he'll stand firmly behind FTA's safety people if they take the same attitude as the rest of the agency. If there's a way to improve safety by 0.000001% but it causes thousands of hours of rider delays, well, safety is number one...

If platforms get more crowded, that will harm safety too, perhaps far more than whatever a long-term shutdown or slowdown will fix. Same if people switch to driving, where they might imperil not only themselves but others. Shutting down night Metro service might help with repairs but also increase drunk driving, for instance.

Anthony Foxx has been a strong proponent of road safety, no doubt, and deserves credit for it. Still, none of us expects him to write that "America can forget any new road-expansion projects until the roads meet our safety standards."

Elsewhere on the Network today: WABA wonders why DC is still settling for unprotected bike lanes. The Dirt shares visualizations of how different cities have expanded over time. And Citizens for Modern Transit explains Kansas City's new experiment with "micro transit."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Federal Judge Sets Aside a Key Congestion Pricing Lawsuit

Gov. Hochul's rationale for killing congestion pricing took another blow on Thursday as a federal judge dismissed one of the major lawsuits against it.

June 21, 2024

Friday’s Headlines Are Supercommuting

Why are so many Americans schlepping to work for 2+ hours in a car these days?

June 21, 2024

Friday Video: Why Cities Around the World Are Reducing Speed Limits

"At some point, we have to realize that anybody fighting against lower speed limits in cities is either willfully ignorant, or they're a selfish asshole who values their convenience more than other people's safety."

June 21, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: When Driving is Not an Option

Talking with the great Anna Zivarts about non-drivers, car seats, and the week without driving.

June 20, 2024

Report: Cities are Undermining Sustainable Mobility with Fees and Taxes

Why is it so much more expensive to unlock a scooter than it is to just jump in the car?

June 20, 2024
See all posts