Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

When cars were first introduced, writes Jason Segedy at Notes from the Underground, they appeared to signify a tremendous advance for personal mobility and freedom. But Segedy -- who heads Akron's metropolitan planning agency, AMATS -- notes that over time, what has become a near-total reliance on cars for transportation has infringed on our freedom in important and sometimes difficult-to-recognize ways:

A bus stop on Flight Memorial Drive in Copley Township outside Akron, Ohio. The freedom and mobility that cars offer comes at a high price for those who don't drive. Photo: Jason Segedy
A bus stop on Flight Memorial Drive in Copley Township outside Akron, Ohio. The freedom and mobility that cars offer comes at a high price, especially for people who don't drive. Photo: Jason Segedy
false

Cars are a wonderful convenience for many of us, but they are primarily considered such a great convenience because we have collectively built a society where we have to travel long distances, and therefore need cars.

The very rationale for their convenience is a bit of a circular argument, and it's worth considering that it hasn’t always been that way.

Before the automobile was invented, most people had a fairly convenient and quick way to get where they needed to go -- it was called walking. Cities and towns were built to be navigated easily on foot, and barring long trips to distant locales, most people could get to almost everywhere they needed to go in 20 minutes, just like most of us can today -- but without having to own or operate a car.

Yes, the car has helped us cover long distances more effectively. But it has also made us travel long distances for things that we didn’t always have to -- a loaf of bread, a haircut, a postage stamp, or a box of nails.

We all pay dearly for that freedom now, Segedy writes, through the high personal costs of owning cars, the high public costs of car infrastructure, and the high environmental and social costs that cars impose. And the people who pay the highest price, Segedy says, are those who don't drive. And we tend to forget that:

We’ve reordered our entire society; our built environment; even our very way of life, to serve this machine that we were told would serve us.

If only more transportation agencies had such thoughtful leadership.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Biking in LA shares word of a new study finding drivers give more passing room to cyclists in bike lanes. And Streets.mn explains how small towns use the principles of urbanism to boost tourism.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Walk Five Hundred Miles

Or at least, sometimes it seems like the other side of the street is that far away. And wider streets are more dangerous for pedestrians, Smart Cities Dive reports.

October 25, 2024

Opinion: Who Does Passenger Rail Serve?

"In short, passenger rail serves everyone – even the people who don’t meet the profit margins of airlines and car manufacturers."

October 25, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Urgency and Vision Zero

Vision Zero Network founder Leah Shahum on why it’s so hard to make change, the implicit biases around designing for cars and World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims, coming up on Nov. 17.

October 24, 2024

Cycle of Rage: To NY Gov., Saving Lives is Important, But Not if It’s Too Expensive to Suburban Drivers

Gov. Hochul signed into law an expansion on New York City red light cameras on Wednesday, saying that she didn’t want to waste “any more time” before improving road safety — but when it comes to the safety benefits of congestion pricing that she once championed, she said they come at too high of a cost to drivers.

October 24, 2024

Why America Has So Much Road Safety Research, But So Little Actual Safety

Why does all this research not translating into solid guidance that actually saves lives?

October 24, 2024
See all posts