Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

In the weeks leading up to the impending insolvency of America's transportation funding source, members of Congress have come up with some truly outlandish ideas just to avoid raising the gas tax.

Inflation has been eating away at the gas tax for decades. Image: FHWA
Inflation has been eating away at the gas tax for decades. Image: FHWA
false

Not all of the gas tax substitutes are as crazy as reducing postal delivery, however. Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon) has put forward an idea that might be the most sensible so far: replacing the gas tax with a $6.75 tax on each barrel of oil. DeFazio's proposal doesn't raise the gas tax, which -- rightly or wrongly -- is considered a political nonstarter. But it has merit, says Teddy Lederer at Transportation for America:

The "Repeal and Rebuild Act” would create a per-barrel fee on oil headed to refineries, with a refund for non-automotive uses and diesel fuel. Although consumers would no longer pay directly, Rep. DeFazio's office says, this would preserve the "user pays" feature of the highway and transit program by continuing to collect based on fuel use.

"What if we got rid of the tax that people don’t like," Rep. De Fazio told The Oregonian newspaper, “and move it upstream to something that most people don’t like — the oil industry?"

A barrel tax of $6.75, combined with indexing the diesel tax to rise with inflation, would raise $314 billion over 10 years, Rep. DeFazio’s office says. The proposal includes repeal of the current truck tire excise tax. The barrel fee would rise over time, because it would be “double indexed” to match the growth of the U.S. DOT’s Highway Construction Cost Index and to replace revenue lost as CAFE standards require greater fuel efficiency. Together with indexing the diesel fuel tax, DeFazio’s proposal would raise $104 billion more over ten years than continuing the existing gas tax.

DeFazio's is a long-term fix that unfortunately doesn't solve the short-term shortfall. There would need to be a stop-gap funding measure until 2017, when DeFazio's proposal would start generating a positive balance, Lederer reports.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Strong Towns says America's unparalleled prosperity has made it complacent, not innovative, when it comes to transportation. And Walkable Dallas Fort Worth says the Big D can be transformed if it just imagines itself as a place where people, not cars, are prioritized.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Thursday’s Headlines Walk Hard

Where you live probably has a lot to do with how much you walk.

February 19, 2026

When The Suburbs Want To Opt Out of Funding Regional Transit

A messy transit funding fight in Dallas may have reached a pause — but some advocates fear the détente won't hold.

February 19, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Have Consequences

The Trump administration's actions on climate change have consequences for future generations. Industries might not like what they get in return.

February 18, 2026

Trump’s Canada Bridge Tantrum Could Be Bad News For An International Bike Trail

A multi-use trail along the Gordie Howe Bridge would be a key component of an epic cross-continental trail route — if Trump doesn't prevent the entire structure from opening.

February 17, 2026

Disturbing Utah ‘Bikelash’ Bill Takes Aim at Salt Lake City Traffic Calming

Utah state legislators aren't traffic engineers — so why are they writing laws that would force the review of specific bike lanes already on the roads in their capitol, and preemptively stop Salt Lake from building more?

February 17, 2026

The Explainer: How Big Tech Push For Cheap Car Insurance Hurts Victims

In New York State, Gov. Kathy Hochul is distorting the notion of "affordability" to do Big Tech's bidding.

February 17, 2026
See all posts