Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

Last week, about 375 people attended the National Women's Bike Forum the day before the National Bike Summit in Washington, DC. It was the third women's forum, an event that seeks to empower female bike advocates and confront issues that contribute to women's low cycling rate relative to men in the United States. (Just 24 percent of bike trips nationwide in 2009.)

At last count, women made up just 23 percent of commuter cyclists in the U.S. Photo: Philly.com
In 2009, the last year for which data is available, women accounted for 24 percent of bike trips in the U.S. Photo: Philly.com
false

Elly Blue at Taking the Lane explains that there was some debate about the approach:

There’s been some buzz online -- does it make sense to have a separate women’s event? Does it help or does it segregate? Is the women’s forum the reason that the ensuing National Bike Summit was largely populated and led by white men? Does having a separate event mean women are accepting “separate but equal” status? Or is it empowering? Or a little of both? A lot of folks are talking about this, and with a lot of uncertainty.

Blue says she takes inspiration from one of her mentors in publishing, who said members of an excluded group in a movement or community have three options:

You can join something and change it from within.

Or you can fight it, defining yourself in opposition to it.

Or you can start your own version, in parallel -- building it from the ground up and getting it right, creating a counter-example that the original alienating thing itself will, if it intends to survive, eventually end up emulating.

The path I’ve chosen is the parallel one. And that’s what I hope will happen with the National Women’s Bicycling Forum. What if it became the main event, and bicycle advocacy heading into the future was primarily led by diverse women with a grassroots ethos? It’s entirely possible, since both events are organized by the same people at the League of American Bicyclists. So why not? If we want the movement to stay relevant and become more effective, that’s where the shift will happen.

Blue said she is starting a forum called the Wheelwomen Switchboard, open to all women cyclists, to help keep the conversation going year round.

Elsewhere on the Network today: ATL Urbanist remembers urban thinker Lewis Mumford, whose ideas about livable cities seem all the more relevant more than 20 years after his death. BikeWalkLee reports that Florida Governor Rick Scott has named March the state's bike month, acknowledging cycling's benefits to the economy, public health, and transportation system. And Better Cities & Towns! says we need "a new math" to build the cities we want.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s Wednesday’s Headlines

Is our Jetsons future is finally upon us? Plus, a new and better way to measure streets' level of service.

September 17, 2025

Op-Ed: Congress Has A Big Opportunity to Connect America By Intercity Bus

The next federal transportation bill could be a chance to connect rural America with buses like never before — and it will have spillover benefits nationwide, the CEO of one top bus company argues.

September 17, 2025

Breaking: US DOT Pulls Grants For Projects That Aren’t Focused on Cars

The Trump administration bias for "vehicular travel" — and the burning of fossil fuels that it requires — rears its ugly head again.

September 16, 2025

Seattle’s Human Population Is Up, But Its Car Population Isn’t

Urbanists have long been making that case that growth in Seattle is the most climate-friendly and easiest to support with transit and infrastructure. And it's happening.

September 16, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Stay Safe

Political rhetoric notwithstanding, you're much safer on a bus or a train than in a car, or walking or biking near cars.

September 16, 2025
See all posts