Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

After U.S. DOT released a report earlier this month on pedestrian safety, media outlets around the country raced to produce indictments of "drunk walking."

"Drunk Walking Leads to Pedestrian Fatalities," exclaimed Tulsa's News on 6, as if people on foot have the same responsibility to be sober as people operating fast, heavy machinery. "Among pedestrians aged 25- to 34-years-old who were killed, half were alcohol-impaired," wrote the Cleveland Plain Dealer's Alison Grant, applying the same .08 percent blood-alcohol standard that's used to measure driving impairment. These articles stop just short of saying a legal prohibition on "drunk walking" is the next logical step.

Applying the same behavioral standards to walking that we attach to driving is a creeping trend. The New York Times has ruminated on the "dangers of distracted walking." In California a new Senate resolution encourages education in "defensive walking and biking" as a response to pedestrian fatalities among children.

It may be tempting to use driving terms to frame discussions about pedestrian safety because driving is, in many places, the default mode of transportation in the U.S. But there's a problem with simply assigning the responsibilities that come with driving -- like being sober, not texting -- to walking. Walking is a right, not a revocable privilege like driving.

Kids walk. Blind people walk. People with poor judgment walk. That's not going to change, and we shouldn't pretend it can or will. Texting while walking, or trying to cross the street with .09 percent blood alcohol content should not put people at risk of an early death.

Pedestrian deaths are a systemic problem, and the problem isn't that people are texting, or drunk, or not being defensive enough. Pedestrians aren't, in themselves, doing anything dangerous, at least until you add cars to the equation.

The core problem is that it isn't safe for people to walk. In too many places, this is because we've designed intersections like high-stakes obstacle courses for people on foot. We allow people to drive at potentially fatal speeds in pedestrian-rich areas. And now we're talking about pedestrian deaths in a way that equates walking with driving.

It's a powerful testament to the structural inequality faced people on foot in this country that a report about 4,000 pedestrian deaths each year could be framed as an indictment of "drunk walking."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Should We Stop Calling Them ‘Low-Traffic Neighborhoods’?

Is it time for London's game-changing urban design concept to get a rebrand?

January 30, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Yearn to Breathe Free

While EVs aren't the be-all end-all, especially when it comes to traffic safety, they do make the air cleaner. Most of the U.S. is falling behind on their adoption, though.

January 30, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: One Year of Congestion Pricing

Danny Pearlstein of New York City's Riders Alliance breaks down how advocates made congestion pricing happen in the Big Apple.

January 29, 2026

Improving Road Safety Is A Win For The Climate, Too

Closing the notorious "fatality target" loophole wouldn't just save lives — it'd help save the human species from climate catastrophe, too.

January 29, 2026

Delivery Workers Are the Safest Cyclists On the Road, Study Finds

Deliveristas are less likely to engage in roadway behaviors that endanger pedestrians or themselves. So why are they so villainized?

January 29, 2026

The Cup Runneth Over With Thursday’s Headlines

Density lends itself to an abundance of transportation options and an abundance of money saved by not driving, writes David Zipper.

January 29, 2026
See all posts