Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
ITDP

ITDP Debuts a LEED-Type Rating System for Transit-Oriented Development

A new TOD scoring system rates projects by how much space is devoted to moving and storing cars. Image: ##http://www.itdp.org/library/publications/the-tod-standard-version-10## Institute for Transportation & Development Policy## Click to enlarge

"Transit-oriented development" is probably one of the more abused terms in all of urban planning. Listen carefully in some cities, and you'll hear urban development professionals calling parking garages "transit-oriented development" without a hint of irony.

Last week, the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy released the first draft of a new scoring system that should help identify what really deserves to be called transit-oriented development and what is merely car-centric development pretending to be TOD.  ITDP hopes the system will function as an international standard for transit-oriented development -- a LEED for TOD, if you will  -- much like the organization's standard for bus rapid transit.

ITDP does not consider anything that is outside of 800 meters walking distance from transit transit-oriented development. Image: ##http://www.itdp.org/library/publications/the-tod-standard-version-10## ITDP##

The "TOD Standard" rates development projects based on factors like residential density and the length of blocks. A project can garner up to 100 points for characteristics that support transit use, while up to 50 points can be subtracted for characteristics that induce driving.

ITDP's scoring criteria are divided into eight categories. The category with the greatest weight is "mode shift," and it rewards projects that minimize space for parking and automobile traffic. The less space for cars, the greater transit's mode-share will be.

At the Transport Politic, Yonah Freemark set out to see how some American TOD projects measure up according to the ITDP standard. He scored the Lindbergh Town Center project in Atlanta, the NorthPoint project in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Vienna MetroWest in suburban DC.

The MetroWest project scored only 3 points, while Lindbergh scored a total of 39. NorthPoint scored the with a grand total of 63 points. (NorthPoint and MetroWest are not yet complete, and could score higher once they're finished.) The scores that the rating system produced make intuitive sense, Freemark notes, but he questions whether the standard is based on observed relationships between TOD characteristics and transit ridership levels.

For now the scoring system is still in the pilot phase. Next year, after receiving feedback, ITDP plans to adjust the TOD standard and release a revised version and recognize projects that rate highly. It will be interesting to see how American TOD projects measure up. Hopefully, in the meantime, this can be a helpful guide to what should and should not be called TOD.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Climate Change Is Making Waiting For Transit Worse — And It’s Hurting Ridership

Transit isn't only a key solution to confronting climate change; it's also one of its victims.

March 12, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Are About Elon-ed Out

While President Trump tries to pump up Tesla stock prices, Elon Musk wants to privatize Amtrak.

March 12, 2025

How Highways Rend Our Social Fabric — and the Challenge of Mending It

Roads are supposed to connect us. So why do so many highways tear our social networks apart?

March 11, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Walk the Line

Pedestrian deaths were trending slightly downward at the midway point of last year, but the trend over the past decade is still terrifying.

March 11, 2025

Massachusetts Lawmakers Are Still Spending Millions to Subsidize Elon Musk’s Car Company

In the three months between Election Day and February 5th (the last date for which data is currently available), Massachusetts taxpayers have sent $8.6 million in direct payments to buyers at Tesla dealerships.

March 10, 2025
See all posts