Washington State Considering a “Symbolic” Tax on Bicycles
In the last few months, we've seen all sorts of proposals from states trying to keep their transportation budgets solvent.
But here's a new one -- the pointless bike tax. Lawmakers in Washington state have proposed a $10 billion transportation spending package that will raise gas taxes and vehicle registration fees. In addition, the draft transportation bill includes what local media are calling a "symbolic" tax on bicycles.
Evan Manvel, writing for Seattle's Cascade Bicycle Club, says the tax, which is expected to raise just $1 million over 10 years, is misplaced:
The package’s proposed bike excise tax ($25 on sales of bikes costing more than $500) would harm hard-working small business owners. Most such bikes are sold by small family-owned bike shops and this would impose red tape and costs for them while creating virtually no revenue.
People who bicycle already pay substantial taxes for our transportation system, including the sales taxes, property taxes and federal taxes that together cover two-thirds of all transportation spending in Washington. Bicyclists who own cars also pay the same car tabs as everyone else even if they drive less.
In addition to serving no apparent purpose except "making bicyclists pay," the tax is out of all proportion to the equivalent car taxes, as Richard Masoner points out at Cyclelicious:
A $25 tax is 4% of the value of an entry level $600 bicycle. Compare that against the 0.3% excise tax on new car and truck purchases. Both are on top of the 6.5% state sales tax and whatever local sales taxes that might apply. That’s a full magnitude of difference.
Meanwhile, Jonathan Maus at Bike Portland writes the idea of a bike tax has been tossed around in Oregon for a long time and it wouldn't surprise him if it emerges in budget negotiations there as well. In the past, some Oregon bike advocates have supported such proposals, under the notion that it would help allay the perception -- no matter how inaccurate -- that cyclists don't pay for roads.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Urban Review STL shows a great example from St. Louis of how a former gas station can be transformed into a truly lovable urban space. The Fast Lane shares U.S. DOT's plan to make the nation's national parks more accessible by transit. And Transportation for America writes that the latest standoff in Washington over the budget "sequester" threatens to be very bad news for the transportation programs that are most popular in local communities.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Friday’s Headlines Are Tired Out
Whether it's from degradation or the dust resulting from wear and tear, it's becoming increasingly clear that tire and brake emissions are harmful, perhaps even exceeding tailpipe emissions.
Study: What Road Diets Mean For Older Drivers
"After a road diet, all motorists seem to drive at a rate that feels comfortable to a mildly-impaired older adult."
Op-Ed: Why Is Fare Evasion Punished More Severely than Speeding?
A.B. 819 offers California the opportunity to decriminalize fare evasion and replace punitive measures with more equitable approaches.
Talking Headways Podcast: Local Culture and Development
We chat with Tim Sprague from Phoenix about supporting local culture through development projects and the importance of sustainable development and transportation.
City of Yes Yes Yes! Adams Calls for Elimination of Parking Mandates on ALL New Housing
Mayor Adams today announced the historic end to one of the city’s most antiquated — and despised — zoning laws requiring the construction of parking with every new development.
