Has DOT Retained a Bit of Say-So on TIFIA?

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced today that the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the new, expanded TIFIA loan program is now available [PDF]. The recently-passed MAP-21 transportation reauthorization dramatically expanded TIFIA, bringing the program’s funding up from $122 million to $750 million next year and $1 billion in 2014.

The state of Alaska applied for a TIFIA loan last year for a bridge to this booming metropolis. If they're the first out of the gates this time around, will the DOT be forced to grant them a TIFIA loan? Image: ##http://www.knikarmbridge.com/TIFIA.html##Knik Arm Bridge and Tolling Authority##

Subtract $60 million in 2013 and $80 million in 2014 for administration and overhead, and that’s still a big ka-ching for people pushing transportation projects. “Each dollar of federal funds can provide approximately 10 dollars in TIFIA credit assistance,” LaHood said, “meaning $17 billion in loans through TIFIA. That in turn can leverage $20-30 billion in investments.”

As Streetsblog reported earlier this month, TIFIA scuttled all of its very sound project selection criteria this time around — for things like environmental sustainability and the project’s value to the region — and the DOT is now supposed to just hand out money to the first person who comes a-calling. There will still be rigorous evaluation of a project’s ability to pay the loan back — making toll roads very popular TIFIA candidates — but that’s about it.

What a way to ruin a good program. As LaHood’s deputy, Chris Bertram, told reporters this morning, “If somebody applied before and didn’t get it, we anticipate they’ll send us a letter.” Rejects from previous rounds, who already have a completed application on the shelf, will have no problem being first in line — and the program is now first-come-first-served. Does that mean all those projects that weren’t good enough last time will now eat up this huge amount of money? An infamous Bridge to Nowhere applied for a TIFIA loan last year, though a project that wouldn’t be used much probably couldn’t get past the creditworthiness check.

There are a few lines in the NOFA that made us wonder, though, if there might still be a modicum of discretion left to DOT officials reviewing applications. Yes, DOT has to get back to project sponsors within 30 days of receiving their application to confirm that the application is complete, and then within 60 more days, they need to give them an answer. But the application isn’t the first point of contact.

As Bertram mentioned, the first thing that happens is that the sponsor sends a Letter of Interest. There doesn’t appear to be a strict timeline on DOT responses to those letters. The NOFA merely says, “DOT will review Letters of Interest on a rolling basis and invite project sponsors to apply once a favorable eligibility determination is made.”

It also says that “DOT will evaluate each Letter of Interest to determine whether it would be in the public interest to provide credit assistance to the proposed project.” Project sponsors are supposed to provide quantitative or qualitative information about those public benefits in their letters. To define exactly what a “public benefit” entails, DOT points project sponsors toward three passages in existing transportation law — including a section on public transportation.

LaHood dismissed the suggestion that TIFIA would be weakened by the elimination of selection criteria. “I think we’re going to be looking at opportunities for projects that really are of a national significance,” he said, “that are projects where there’s a good collaboration and cooperation; where people are coming together on how to do some pretty significant infrastructure projects. And I also think we have a pretty good track record with TIFIA.”

LaHood was defensive about previous complaints that the response from the TIFIA office has been slow and emphasized that they’re going to be hiring new personnel. “We’re going to have to hire some people,” he said. “We need to find some smart people who’ve been involved in infrastructure loans that can help us expedite and give good guidance to people who are going to send us letters.”

Consider that a Help Wanted notice, dear readers.


Bay Area’s Oakland Airport Connector Project Loses More Federal Funding

As transportation planners and transit agencies around the country yesterday celebrated the announcement of the $1.5 billion in Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grants, BART received more troubling news that could hurt the feasibility of its planned Oakland Airport Connector (OAC). (Image: BART) After losing $70 million in stimulus funds last week because the […]

U.S. DOT Cagey on Funding New Transport Bill as Senators Seek Solutions

Senators began searching today for new strategies to connect local planners with an ever-dwindling pot of federal infrastructure dollars, even as a senior U.S. DOT aide declined to say whether the White House’s upcoming principles for the next long-term transportation bill would include funding specifics. Antonio Villaraigosa is seeking a bridge loan from Washington to […]

Expanded, Simplified TIFIA Still Greasing the Gears of Highway Expansion

A federal loan awarded to a California highway illustrates how TIFIA, the “innovative” transportation financing program that was expanded as part of MAP-21, is still funding business-as-usual highway projects. U.S. DOT announced last week that it would back California’s SR 91 highway expansion in suburban Los Angeles with $421 million in low-interest loans. The project […]

New Report: Feds Subsidizing Parking Six Times as Much as Transit

(Image: Subsidyscope) "Subsidy" is a word used quite often in transportation policy-making circles, whether by road acolytes who claim (falsely) that highways are not federally subsidized because of the gas tax or by transit boosters who lament Washington’s unceasing focus on paying for more local asphalt. But the subsidy debate often overlooks the government tax […]

As MAP-21 Takes Effect, Road Builders Vie for TIFIA Funds

It’s October 1, the start of the federal government’s fiscal year 2013, and the first official day of the MAP-21 transportation law. The law was signed July 6 but got a three-month grace period to let U.S. DOT set guidance and give states a little time to get ready for the new requirements — things like setting […]