Skip to content

Analysts: Traffic Congestion Down 30 Percent Last Year

More interesting and puzzling news about Americans' evolving driving habits: Research group INRIX recently announced that urban traffic congestion plummeted 30 percent in 2011 over the previous year.

More interesting and puzzling news about Americans’ evolving driving habits: Research group INRIX recently announced that urban traffic congestion plummeted 30 percent in 2011 over the previous year.

INRIX’s Traffic Scorecard Annual Report analyzed congestion on highways in America’s 100 largest cities. Overall, the index for 2011 was 5.9, meaning commuters spent almost 6 percent more time on the roads due to congestion than if they were on traffic-free highways.

Traffic jams were down in 70 metros. INRIX attributed the decline to a “jobless recovery” from America’s 2007-2008 economic meltdown — the last time congestion declined so rapidly. Some metros with better employment figures and lower gas prices — like Atlanta, Houston and Miami — showed increased congestion, the organization noted.

In addition to high gas prices and poor economic performance, INRIX attributed vanishing congestion in part to a decline in road construction brought on by the completion of most stimulus projects, as well as uncertainty around federal infrastructure funding and anemic local and state budgets.

National declines in driving or increases in transit ridership were not mentioned as contributing factors.

Still, it’s somewhat mysterious. Was the economy really so much worse in 2011 than 2010? Growth did slow down some in that time, but it was still positive.

Or is something else going on here — like the “decoupling” of driving from economic fluctuations?

Unlike many reports on congestion, the INRIX analysis does not seize the opportunity to call for a massive campaign of road widening. The organization notes that only 1 percent of the nation’s urban highways are sources of recurring congestion, something that was true even when congestion was at its highest in 2007. The vast majority of congestion problems are caused by incidental factors like collisions, weather conditions, construction projects and special events.

The report authors advocated action, but not large construction projects, in response to the lost productivity and waste caused by traffic snarls:

“Whatever the solutions may be – extra capacity, active traffic management, toll express lanes, transit alternatives, or creative ideas not yet thought of that shift just enough traffic from peak days/times/locations to break the gridlock – we will not unclog America’s key roads by adding line miles in the exurbs.”

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Cities Need More ‘Agile’ Streets

March 26, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Feel Pain at the Pump

March 25, 2026

D.C. Advocates Sue To Save Key Bike Lane From Trump Teardown

March 24, 2026

How a ‘Universal Basic Neighborhood’ Can Help Americans Live Longer

March 24, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Keep Our Eyes on the Road

March 24, 2026
See all posts