Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

More interesting and puzzling news about Americans' evolving driving habits: Research group INRIX recently announced that urban traffic congestion plummeted 30 percent in 2011 over the previous year.

INRIX's Traffic Scorecard Annual Report analyzed congestion on highways in America's 100 largest cities. Overall, the index for 2011 was 5.9, meaning commuters spent almost 6 percent more time on the roads due to congestion than if they were on traffic-free highways.

Traffic jams were down in 70 metros. INRIX attributed the decline to a "jobless recovery" from America's 2007-2008 economic meltdown -- the last time congestion declined so rapidly. Some metros with better employment figures and lower gas prices -- like Atlanta, Houston and Miami -- showed increased congestion, the organization noted.

In addition to high gas prices and poor economic performance, INRIX attributed vanishing congestion in part to a decline in road construction brought on by the completion of most stimulus projects, as well as uncertainty around federal infrastructure funding and anemic local and state budgets.

National declines in driving or increases in transit ridership were not mentioned as contributing factors.

Still, it's somewhat mysterious. Was the economy really so much worse in 2011 than 2010? Growth did slow down some in that time, but it was still positive.

Or is something else going on here -- like the "decoupling" of driving from economic fluctuations?

Unlike many reports on congestion, the INRIX analysis does not seize the opportunity to call for a massive campaign of road widening. The organization notes that only 1 percent of the nation's urban highways are sources of recurring congestion, something that was true even when congestion was at its highest in 2007. The vast majority of congestion problems are caused by incidental factors like collisions, weather conditions, construction projects and special events.

The report authors advocated action, but not large construction projects, in response to the lost productivity and waste caused by traffic snarls:

"Whatever the solutions may be – extra capacity, active traffic management, toll express lanes, transit alternatives, or creative ideas not yet thought of that shift just enough traffic from peak days/times/locations to break the gridlock – we will not unclog America’s key roads by adding line miles in the exurbs."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Newsom Names GM CEO Mary Barra as Villain in Fight with Feds over Air Quality

Car company executives make good rhetorical foils. But they can't be held responsible for the state's shortcomings.

September 29, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Go on Offense

The "defensive driving" they teach in driver's ed has now turned into "defensive walking," and one car website has had it with victim-blaming.

September 29, 2025

States Have More Power Than They Think to Fund Sustainable Transportation

As the Trump administration claws back money for sustainable modes, states have a big opportunity to fill the gap.

September 29, 2025

Advocates: Congress Must Stop Trump From Illegally Holding Back Sustainable Transportation Funds

Congress has a chance to restore order, seize back their power of the purse, and stop Trump from "pocket-rescinding" hundreds of millions for good transportation projects.

September 26, 2025

Friday Video: You Should Care That Your Car Is Spying On You

Yes, every device we own is probably harvesting our data. But the car might be the worst offender.

September 26, 2025

The State of Friday’s Headlines

Transit agencies from Rhode Island to San Francisco are facing budget shortfalls as a variety of factors create a perfect storm.

September 26, 2025
See all posts