Two Ways to Sustain Wisconsin’s Highway Racket: Tolls or Crushing Debt
It's the 1950s all over again in Wisconsin -- where, as we've reported before -- there seems to be an undying faith among political leaders that highway spending will restore prosperity, despite the fact that more forward-thinking regions are investing in things like tearing down highways.
Since Scott Walker became governor, touting himself as a fiscal conservative, Wisconsin has embarked on a bonanza of highway spending, including a $1.7 billion interchange, a $207 million highway expansion, and a $25 million "interchange to nowhere."
This week, "budget conscious" state leaders pulled the trigger on a $715 million highway widening that the State Journal called "one of the most expensive highway projects in state history."
James Rowen at The Political Environment skewers the sheer recklessness of it all and questions whether electeds have the stomach to actually pay for the highway binge.
It's an open-and-shut case. Just get us some new lanes and screw the price - - which does not appear on the official WisDOT Q&A web page for the project, because cost is not a real part of the discussion.
Can we afford it? Not important: Just build it and charge it. knowing the full cost gets buried in the fine print of out-year budgets long after the eight years of construction has ended and everyone is distracted by the new lanes and 'improvements' grabbing our attention elsewhere.
But it's a real question. Because this time the state's share is growing to 30%, a lot more than the typical 10-20%, with the federal government picking up a smaller share of the tab.
How about the State Legislature - - now content to bill residents through stiff per-gallon gas and other taxes, and bonding interest - - instead talked up and bought into tolling the road to come up with some of the state's $200+million share - - and also collected tolls to pay for the 'routine' annual maintenance, plowing, patrolling and repairing costs no one ever adds to projects' bottom lines.
Tolls, anyone? I didn't think so.
Elsewhere on the Network today: M-Bike.org reports that city leaders in Detroit have an "aggressive" plan to add bike infrastructure. Missouri Bicycle Federation introduces the concept of sustainable street certification, like LEED for streets. And Flat Iron Bike discusses how standard liability in car wrecks is inappropriate in an age of car sharing.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Why Chicago Advocates Are Providing Bikes to Migrants
Unless funds are freed up from a larger entity, bike distribution to asylum seekers is going to stay in crisis mode indefinitely.
Monday’s Headlines Are Open for Business
Monday will be just another Monday for federal employees, as Congress avoided a government shutdown. Plus, declining gas tax revenue provides an opportunity to rethink transportation funding.
Why Connecticut is Investing in New Regional Rail
Gov. Ned Lamont will spend $315 million investment on new rail cars — but they're not going anywhere near Grand Central. Here's why.
NYers Share Their ‘End of Days’ Flooding Pics
It's bad out there. How bad? Here is a citywide roundup from our staff ... and our friends on social media.
To Help Save the Planet, Take the ‘Week Without Driving’ Challenge
Former Sierra Club President Ramón Cruz is urging Americans to give up driving for seven days — and support policies to make it optional for everyone.
