Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

The Seattle Times: For Free Markets, Unless They Mean Less Parking

Minimum parking requirements are, essentially, a tax on development meant to encourage driving. The cost of housing and offices rises and the difference in rents and sales prices is plowed into new automobile infrastructure. But there is perhaps no other American entitlement as fiercely defended as this widely misunderstood car subsidy.

false

Take this case from Seattle, where the city is considering eliminating parking minimums in areas with frequent transit service. The Seattle Times is making no bones about where it stands: for the public -- even those without a car -- ponying up five-figure sums to build unnecessary levels of parking, and for all the harm that parking causes in the form of increased auto dependency and pollution.

The newspaper called Mayor Mike McGinn's common-sense plan to let developers near transit stops determine how much parking their tenants will need "utopian and anti-family." Huh?

Erica C. Barnett at Seattle Network blog PubliCola reports:

The idea is that if buyers want to live in a condo without paying an extra $10,000 to $25,000 or more  for parking, developers should be free to give them that option.

But the Times —echoing its totally nonbiased front-page coverage of the issue a few weeks ago, complete with the headline, “Parking around Seattle may get worse as city planners favor transit”— insists on government intervention. If homebuyers don’t want parking, and developers want to give homebuyers what they want, then only city bureaucrats can force developers to provide the unwanted parking spaces.

“It is utopian,” the Times writes, ”to think that many people will abandon their cars. A few will, but the vast majority who can afford market-priced housing in Seattle will have a motor vehicle, now and always. If they have a vehicle, they will park it — somewhere.”

If the Times is right, of course — if “the vast majority” of Seattle residents are “always” going to have a car — then the market, being the market, will provide parking for them. Nothing in the legislation the council is considering prevents that. All the proposal does is give developers some flexibility to provide less parking in cases where the demand for one parking space per unit isn’t there — something the ordinarily pro-free-market Times should be willing to get behind.

If the city of Seattle follows the terrible advice of its newspaper of record, it will end up like Chicago, requiring more parking than residents of transit-accessible neighborhoods demand. That's bad for residents. It's bad for business. And it's bad for the city. What a shame that Seattle can't count on its paper of record to understand the virtues of free markets and sustainability.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Greater City Providence wonders if the Rhode Island Department of Transportation understands the concept of induced demand. Portland Transport reports that the new, much-hyped car-sharing service car2go comes with a smart parking innovation. And Bike Lane Living celebrates the power of cycling to lower Americans' healthcare burden.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Vital ‘Lifeline’ or Blatant Ripoff? Instacart Makes NYC Groceries 75% More Expensive

Instacart is arguing that its services are a lifeline to low income New Yorkers, but the app makes groceries 75 percent more expensive.

August 12, 2025

Is U.S. Passenger Rail Having a Big Moment?

We brought in an expert to unpack some of the biggest rail headlines of the day — and a few you might have missed.

August 12, 2025

Tuesday’s Orwellian Headlines

We've always been at war with Oceania, if you believe the Department of Energy.

August 12, 2025

Katie Wilson’s Success in Seattle Shows Again that Urbanism Is A Winning Campaign Issue

The transit advocate's strong early performance in Seattle's mayoral primary is rekindling a national conversation about the power of bold transportation reform to win at the ballot box.

August 11, 2025

Who Owns the Most Dangerous Roads in America? Likely Your State

Two states show that meaningful, statewide action is possible to save lives on state-owned arterials — and cities show the results.

August 11, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Get Over the Hump

The humble speed hump can lower speeds on residential streets by 10 to 25 percent, and cost just $5,000 apiece.

August 11, 2025
See all posts