Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Federal Funding

Congress Agrees to Kick the Can for 90 More Days

3:26 PM EDT on March 30, 2012

Yesterday, before taking off for a two-week recess, Congress passed a three-month extension of SAFETEA-LU, the ninth since it first expired on September 30, 2009. It now only needs the president's signature sometime before midnight on Saturday to become law.

That means that on June 26, 2012, current transportation policy will have been operating under temporary extensions for 1,000 days. Four days later, it will be due to expire yet again.

One thousand days. Think about how much more could have been accomplished if in September of 2009, Congress had simply approved a 3-year, $150 billion extension rather than piecing one together three or six months at a time. Cities and transit agencies, for instance, would have had the funding guarantees to support investment in infrastructure while they ride out the recession.

The political dynamics at work are complex. But at the most basic level, no one in Washington has mustered the will to tell Americans the truth: "Transportation isn't free."

Take the Senate's two-year bill. Its loudest critics complain that it doesn't offer the funding guarantees of a five-year bill. And that's true -- even the bill's supporters would agree. But the whole rationale behind the decision to cap the bill at two years was that the gas tax could just barely get them to the end of 2013.

At some point, Congress and the president will have to clear this hurdle. Whether by raising the gas tax and indexing it to inflation, implementing a mileage tax, or simply letting existing highways be tolled, the money has to come from somewhere.

You won't hear anyone in Washington say that these days. Instead, the more conservative representatives will talk about how the federal government is exceeding its authority in paying for transit and bike lanes because they don't cross state lines. Or the believers in private financing will say they need more time to develop "innovative" (read: magic) funding schemes that'll saddle later generations -- my generation -- with the cost of the transportation fantasy they've sold to their constituents.

"The money just isn't there!" cried House Majority Leader Eric Cantor this week, apparently forgetting the option of raising the gas tax. To which his (Republican!) colleague in the House Walter Jones responded, "Then why are we spending $10 billion a month in Afghanistan?" Because freedom isn't free, as they say.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Tuesday’s Headlines Triple the Fun

Amtrak is staffing up and ready to spend the $66 billion it received from the bipartisan federal infrastructure law.

September 26, 2023

Pols: Congress Must Bolster Sustainable Commutes to Reduce Carbon and Congestion

The feds should bolster sustainable commuting modes and transportation demand management strategies.

September 26, 2023

Monday’s Headlines Are All About Pete

From trying to avert a government shutdown to promoting rail safety, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is in the midst of a busy week.

September 25, 2023

What is the Life of a Dead Pedestrian Worth?

A Seattle police officer sparked outrage when he joked that the death of pedestrian Jaahnavi Kandula might be settled for as little as $11,000. Some families get even less.

September 25, 2023

Why Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled Matters

“Our job now is to prioritize solutions that mitigate the impacts of climate change while equitably improving quality of life. To do so we need to rethink how we build so Californians can drive less."

September 22, 2023
See all posts