Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

How you get to work -- it's a function of where you live, the options available to you and, to some extent, your own personal preferences.

Not least of these considerations is the question of where you work. In fact, the most important factor behind the decision to commute by car or take transit may be the location of your job.

In a recent post on Pedestrian Observations, Alon Levy writes that a centralized employment district is the hallmark of a truly transit-oriented city:

Although it’s a commonplace that New York employment is centralized around Manhattan, in reality most of Manhattan is residential, and employment is concentrated in a few square kilometers in the heart of Midtown. This is where the subway lines converge from all directions – elsewhere there simply isn’t enough capacity. Of course it wasn’t always like this: Manhattan’s population in the 1890s was the same as it is today, and it was clustered toward the southern third of the island, but employment was relatively evenly distributed in the downtown area. What has happened since then is that New York became a transit city.

There’s a strong correlation between the form of a city and the mix of transportation options people use. This extends well beyond density, but the principle is the same. Transit is at its best at high intensity, because this is what supports high-frequency service. Cars are the opposite: even on a normal urban street, a car alone will beat any rapid transit line, but every additional car will slow down the road dramatically, so that at even the moderate intensity of an edge city gridlock ensues.

Although usually this principle is stated in terms of density, it’s equally true for work centralization. The pedestrian city and the bus city will be dense all over, and feature high job density scattered across neighborhoods: walking is too slow for the transit city pattern to emerge, and buses have too little capacity. But dedicated rapid transit wants to serve an area right next to the stations, and once a network is built, a CBD grows around the central area.

Elsewhere on the Network today: A car-free Canadian family tells their story. Bike Delaware explains how complex intersection markings are helping ease the tension between cyclists and drivers. And Systematic Failure explains why American stair channels (for transporting bikes into underground transit stations) haven't lived up to the European models.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Everyone to Congress: Stand Up and Fight for the Infrastructure Funding You Allocated (And Your Constituents Need)

"The president has made it clear that programs outside the administration’s narrow vision for transportation will not be faithfully implemented," advocates said this week — and it's time for congress to stand up and defend their will.

September 25, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Take Off the Mask

From a transportation perspective, the Trump administration is no longer pretending it's interested in anyone other than motorists.

September 25, 2025

Want Safer Vehicles? Amid Federal Inaction, Look to the States

Our federal regulatory framework still lacks essential technology that makes cars, SUVs, and trucks safer. So states are leading.

September 24, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Get Ready for War

Rural hostility toward transit could wreck American cities, and as a result the economy as a whole, according to Jarrett Walker.

September 24, 2025

Our Streets Look Like War Zones — But What if They Were ‘Sites of Peacebuilding’ Instead?

A peace and conflict studies scholar weighs in on what car culture has in common with global conflicts — and why we need to confront violence on our roads if we want to end violence around the globe.

September 23, 2025
See all posts