Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

In Massachusetts, Driving Drunk, Getting Caught, Walking Away Scot Free

When it comes to driving sins, awareness is rising about the dangers of texting. Not to be forgotten is the old classic, drunk driving, which is still the number one driving-related killer. Nearly one-third of motor vehicle fatalities involve alcohol. In 2009, that added up to about 11,000 deaths.

false

Good thing we have a system of strict penalties for those who get behind the wheel after they've been drinking, right?

Oh wait. A series by the Boston Globe found that across Massachusetts, even the most blatant offenders are overwhelmingly acquitted for this deadly serious act. The series found that judges hand down "not guilty" verdicts a staggering 80 percent of the time for drivers charged with operating under the influence -- meaning no fines and no penalties.

Here are some lowlights from the series: A "not guilty" verdict for a multiple offender who ran his snow plow into a house with a vodka bottle in his glove compartment; "not guilty" verdicts for all 11 OUI defendants seen before a judge with a history of drunk driving himself.

James Sinclair at Network blog Stop and Move is disgusted:

...as for the question that "who gets hurt" when a drunk driver is set free? Well, the article lists multiple cases of drivers with multiple DUI's in their history ... drunk driving events that can't be entered into the record because "they deserved a second chance".

And what's worse, these are only cases where the driver gets CAUGHT. How many times are these criminals hitting the streets and not being stopped?

The lawyers are making huge amounts of money, and so can afford cheap expert witnesses and other tools. The prosecutors cannot. Further, the lawyers pick and choose which judges they want...the ones they know rule "not guilty" almost every time.

An in many cases, the judges are their longtime friends and partners.

The blatant disrespect for life is infuriating.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Steven Smith at Forbes writes that those who seek to make New York City housing affordable should look to build upward. This Big City writes that a fairly definitive study confirms that building bike infrastructure networks boosts cycling rates in cities. And I Bike TO says the the removal of a bike lane hurts women the most.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Welcome Our Robot Overlords

The robotaxi field is growing, but with buyouts and now possibly layoffs at the U.S. DOT, will anyone be left to regulate them?

July 30, 2025

Shifting Gears to Urban Bike Delivery

Bikes can revolutionize delivery in urban areas. A new report outlines how policymakers can spur them in their communities.

July 30, 2025

Trump’s ‘Beautiful’ Bill Kills Lovely QueensWay Park (Plus Many Efforts to Erase ‘Racist’ Highways)

Here's another reason for Mayor Adams to have buyer's remorse over his bromance with President Trump.

July 29, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Reel in the Years

Republicans continue to roll back the Biden administration's legacy, most recently ending the DOT's Neighborhood Access and Equity program.

July 29, 2025

What Will It Take To Give Victims and Advocates a Voice at US DOT?

A new bill would put a dedicated "roadway safety advocate" in the halls of US DOT — and you can support it right now.

July 29, 2025

Monday’s Headlines E-Biking Away

There's a million destinations if we had a little help from the government to afford to buy an e-bike.

July 28, 2025
See all posts