In Massachusetts, Driving Drunk, Getting Caught, Walking Away Scot Free
When it comes to driving sins, awareness is rising about the dangers of texting. Not to be forgotten is the old classic, drunk driving, which is still the number one driving-related killer. Nearly one-third of motor vehicle fatalities involve alcohol. In 2009, that added up to about 11,000 deaths.
Good thing we have a system of strict penalties for those who get behind the wheel after they've been drinking, right?
Oh wait. A series by the Boston Globe found that across Massachusetts, even the most blatant offenders are overwhelmingly acquitted for this deadly serious act. The series found that judges hand down "not guilty" verdicts a staggering 80 percent of the time for drivers charged with operating under the influence -- meaning no fines and no penalties.
Here are some lowlights from the series: A "not guilty" verdict for a multiple offender who ran his snow plow into a house with a vodka bottle in his glove compartment; "not guilty" verdicts for all 11 OUI defendants seen before a judge with a history of drunk driving himself.
James Sinclair at Network blog Stop and Move is disgusted:
...as for the question that "who gets hurt" when a drunk driver is set free? Well, the article lists multiple cases of drivers with multiple DUI's in their history ... drunk driving events that can't be entered into the record because "they deserved a second chance".
And what's worse, these are only cases where the driver gets CAUGHT. How many times are these criminals hitting the streets and not being stopped?
The lawyers are making huge amounts of money, and so can afford cheap expert witnesses and other tools. The prosecutors cannot. Further, the lawyers pick and choose which judges they want...the ones they know rule "not guilty" almost every time.
An in many cases, the judges are their longtime friends and partners.
The blatant disrespect for life is infuriating.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Steven Smith at Forbes writes that those who seek to make New York City housing affordable should look to build upward. This Big City writes that a fairly definitive study confirms that building bike infrastructure networks boosts cycling rates in cities. And I Bike TO says the the removal of a bike lane hurts women the most.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Who’s to Blame for Tuesday’s Headlines?
Are the people in this photo inherently "vulnerable", or is this car just dangerous?
Why Riders With Disabilities Have To Sue For Accessible Transit Stops
A Bay Area transit agency is only the latest to be sued over inaccessible stations. What will it take to get every American stop ADA compliant?
Monday’s Headlines Reconnect With Pete
More than $3 billion is flowing out of the White House to help correct infrastructure mistakes in Black communities.
‘Buy, Bully, Bamboozle’: Report Shows App Companies Threaten Democracy
App delivery companies seek to block worker-led improvements by spending big money on political influence, leveraging their data, and even co-opting progressive language, argues a new report that lands days before a national one-day strike by app-workers.
How the Myth that ‘100 Companies’ Are Responsible for Climate Change Hides the True Impact of Automobility
An influential report pins responsibility for the climate crisis to just a handful of oil, gas and cement producers. But who's buying what they're selling — and who's creating policy that makes many of those purchases functionally compulsory?
