Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

There's nothing quite like the prospect of a Wal-Mart to get communities thinking collectively about how development can impact their future.

Because of the retail giant's outsized footprint in the American economy and all that it has come to symbolize about sprawl, its progression into the urban market is bound to lead to some interesting public meetings.

Richard Layman at Network blog Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space says urbanists should focus on what they can influence -- the form the megastore will take in city environments. These excerpts were borrowed from a story he wrote on Wal-Mart's development plans for D.C. for the Washington Business Journal:

false

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s entry into D.C. has been hailed by smart-growth proponents who see it as a sign of suburban-oriented retailers reconsidering the value of urban markets. And it`s been opposed by others, including labor interests fearing that unionized employers such as Safeway and Giant are at risk from Wal-Mart`s hypercompetitive business model, which encompasses low prices and nonunion workers.

Existing zoning at the sites chosen by Wal-Mart allows the sites to be developed with minimal opportunity for planning input. What should matter to most of us ~ and what we can influence ~ is getting the physical form, site planning and mobility right, so that these stores contribute positively to the city`s revitalization, available amenities and quality of life...

Developers should be encouraged to create phased mixed-use development plans, so that sites become more than single-use retail. Underground parking is not enough to maximize the site`s contribution to the city. The developers should be strongly discouraged from signing agreements giving Wal-Mart exclusive use of the sites, and Wal-Mart should agree to have their stores be part of multistory developments.

It's hard to imagine a Wal-Mart without sprawling parking lots near interchanges and the worst characteristics of auto-centric design. We'll see whether strategic negotiation will yield a new dynamic.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Austin on Two Wheels argues that the key to bringing cycling activity in America on par with Europe is to create infrastructure that gives cyclists a travel time advantage over motorists. A Planner's Dream Gone Wrong says that like cities and regions, states should no longer look at their neighbors as rivals, but part of an inner-connected economic system. And TBD on Foot reports that a drunken driver in Maryland will serve eight years for killing a cyclist.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Back the Bikes

Setting aside the fact that bike lanes don't make traffic worse, resisting bikelash on busy roads is essential to creating a useable network.

April 18, 2025

Does Driver’s Ed Really Make Roads Safer? 

States like Georgia are taking a critical look at their drivers education programs — but some say the whole concept of driver's ed deserves scrutiny.

April 18, 2025

Friday Video: Ken Jennings Has a Web Series About Transit!

Jeopardy's host and most famous player is a big fan of the bus — and he's helping educate his fellow Washingtonians about why they should be, too.

April 18, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The Pacific Circuit

Alexis Madrigal connects containerization to globalization and its direct impacts on one Oakland neighborhood.

April 17, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Wonder Why

Why are drivers killing so many pedestrians? Governing magazine has a number of familiar theories.

April 17, 2025
See all posts