Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

There's nothing quite like the prospect of a Wal-Mart to get communities thinking collectively about how development can impact their future.

Because of the retail giant's outsized footprint in the American economy and all that it has come to symbolize about sprawl, its progression into the urban market is bound to lead to some interesting public meetings.

Richard Layman at Network blog Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space says urbanists should focus on what they can influence -- the form the megastore will take in city environments. These excerpts were borrowed from a story he wrote on Wal-Mart's development plans for D.C. for the Washington Business Journal:

false

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s entry into D.C. has been hailed by smart-growth proponents who see it as a sign of suburban-oriented retailers reconsidering the value of urban markets. And it`s been opposed by others, including labor interests fearing that unionized employers such as Safeway and Giant are at risk from Wal-Mart`s hypercompetitive business model, which encompasses low prices and nonunion workers.

Existing zoning at the sites chosen by Wal-Mart allows the sites to be developed with minimal opportunity for planning input. What should matter to most of us ~ and what we can influence ~ is getting the physical form, site planning and mobility right, so that these stores contribute positively to the city`s revitalization, available amenities and quality of life...

Developers should be encouraged to create phased mixed-use development plans, so that sites become more than single-use retail. Underground parking is not enough to maximize the site`s contribution to the city. The developers should be strongly discouraged from signing agreements giving Wal-Mart exclusive use of the sites, and Wal-Mart should agree to have their stores be part of multistory developments.

It's hard to imagine a Wal-Mart without sprawling parking lots near interchanges and the worst characteristics of auto-centric design. We'll see whether strategic negotiation will yield a new dynamic.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Austin on Two Wheels argues that the key to bringing cycling activity in America on par with Europe is to create infrastructure that gives cyclists a travel time advantage over motorists. A Planner's Dream Gone Wrong says that like cities and regions, states should no longer look at their neighbors as rivals, but part of an inner-connected economic system. And TBD on Foot reports that a drunken driver in Maryland will serve eight years for killing a cyclist.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Should We Stop Calling Them ‘Low-Traffic Neighborhoods’?

Is it time for London's game-changing urban design concept to get a rebrand?

January 30, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Yearn to Breathe Free

While EVs aren't the be-all end-all, especially when it comes to traffic safety, they do make the air cleaner. Most of the U.S. is falling behind on their adoption, though.

January 30, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: One Year of Congestion Pricing

Danny Pearlstein of New York City's Riders Alliance breaks down how advocates made congestion pricing happen in the Big Apple.

January 29, 2026

Improving Road Safety Is A Win For The Climate, Too

Closing the notorious "fatality target" loophole wouldn't just save lives — it'd help save the human species from climate catastrophe, too.

January 29, 2026

Delivery Workers Are the Safest Cyclists On the Road, Study Finds

Deliveristas are less likely to engage in roadway behaviors that endanger pedestrians or themselves. So why are they so villainized?

January 29, 2026

The Cup Runneth Over With Thursday’s Headlines

Density lends itself to an abundance of transportation options and an abundance of money saved by not driving, writes David Zipper.

January 29, 2026
See all posts