Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Accounting for the Economic Payoff of Streetcars and Buses

Lots of reaction from Streetsblog Network members to yesterday's big transit grant announcement. They're thrilled in Fort Worth and Cincinnati, where the FTA distributed the maximum $25 million for new streetcar lines. They're disappointed in D.C., where the request to fund a streetcar segment linking up with Metro lines was denied. When a billion dollars worth of requests are put forward for $130 million in grant money, not every good proposal will make it through.

streetcar.jpgPhoto: Fast Lane

A big part of the appeal of these competitive grant programs is that U.S. DOT can use them to advance specific goals, like connecting people to where the jobs are. Michael Lindenberger, a reporter for the Dallas Morning News and Streetsblog Network member, contrasts the performance measures employed by the Obama administration to discarded Bush 43-era criteria that worked against streetcar projects. He reports:

Previously, major transit projects were subjected to a rigorous cost-benefit analysis where success depended almost entirely on whether the money spent produced enough of a mobility benefit for the recipient cities. That meant that transit projects had to draw enough traffic off the crowded urban highways and onto bus and rail to justify the big price tags.

But a drawback of that approach was that it rules out many kinds of downtown projects, including streetcars, because they simply didn't attract sufficient riders to make a difference to the average commute.

So the Obama Administration has given other factors a more prominent place in the transit cost-benefit analysis, and now asks whether a project would spur economic development for its host city. Would it foster land use changes that would add energy to the downtown streets? Would it boost a city's property tax base, or create connections between existing transportation networks, such as rail lines?

These things were on my mind Thursday morning while listening to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood shout out the praises for streetcars, bus rapid transit and other ideas. I wanted a little extra time with FTA Administrator Peter Rogoff to flesh out the details, and Rogoff kindly called me later to discuss them.

"Part of the problem before was that we couldn't look at the economic development aspect of a (transit) project," said Rogoff, who previously was a top Senate staffer who helped write some of the key transportation legislation over the years. "We were collecting data on those things, but the crux of it was that we weren't doing anything with it."

Elsewhere on the Network: Gateway Streets explains why replacing I-70 in downtown St. Louis with an urban boulevard won't cause the traffic disaster Missouri DOT says it will; EcoVelo reports on a new study confirming that the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks; and The Dirt digs up the story of a small Maryland town looking to create some seriously green streets.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Are Many States Trying to Ban Cities From Slowing Down Drivers?

Texas could soon become the latest state to ban its cities from reclaiming lane space from drivers — and now that Trump is in office, some fear that more will follow.

April 24, 2025

Op-Ed: What Cities Can Do as Micromobility Tariffs Loom

"Let’s treat micromobility like the essential service it is, so that we’re ready for whatever comes next."

April 24, 2025

This Philadelphia Council Member Wants To Stand Up to Trump By Investing in Mobility For the Poorest

We sat down with Council Member Nicolas O'Rourke to talk about how he wants to build on the city's Zero Fare pilot — and why prioritizing the poor is more essential now than ever.

April 23, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Stay Safe

While politicians try to stoke fear about riding public transit, statistics show it's much safer than driving.

April 23, 2025

Congestion Pricing Works in Small Metros, Too

The default pundit view is that New York City is the only place in the US where pricing makes sense because of the bountiful availability of buses and subways. A pricing experiment in Indiana and Kentucky, though, busts that myth entirely.

April 23, 2025
See all posts