How Is a Parking Space Different From a Toilet?

112238400_82425abf91.jpgDon’t plan for parking spaces the way you plan for these. (Photo: Admit One via Flickr)

Here’s
the analogy of the day from the Streetsblog Network: Parking spaces are
like toilets — at least for conventional planners.

That line comes from Reinventing Urban Transport, and while it’s good for a laugh, it yields several important insights on closer examination.

Paul
Barter, the blog’s author, has been thinking about the parallels
between parking spaces and toilets for several months now. Here are
some of the similarities that he notes:

    1. Both are treated as an essential ancillary service that every building will need.
    2. It
      is usually assumed that no fee (or a token fee at most perhaps) will be
      charged. Remember, we are talking about the conventional approach to
      parking policy here. Some jurisdictions even ban fees for such
      facilities.
    3. There is thus little direct return
      on the investments. So the private sector would under-provide them
      unless forced to. To the rescue come regulations in the form of parking
      or toilet requirements in planning or building codes.

But
as Barter goes on to argue, planning for parking the way you do for
toilets is a fundamentally flawed approach. Here’s how he starts
breaking it down:

    1. It is much more difficult to predict parking demand than to predict
      toilet demand (which itself is not easy). The human need to expel waste
      changes little (except when beer is consumed in large quantities
      perhaps). The demand for parking can change enormously over time as car
      ownership changes and as mode choices shift.
    2. Everyone needs toilets. Only car users need parking. (But conventional parking policy assumes that ‘car users’ = ‘everyone’.)
    3. Parking
      takes a lot more space than toilets. Forgive me for stating the obvious
      here. It is common for American suburban office parks to be required to
      have as much parking space as they have floor space for other uses.
      Buildings in Kuala Lumpur…or Bangkok often have a third or more of
      their floors devoted to parking. Parking standards often dramatically
      limit the density that is feasible on a site.

There’s
a lot more to his original post, and Barter is looking for more
insights to help develop the idea — which he finds has been quite
useful in presentations. Head on over to his site and offer your feedback.

More from around the network: The Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia reports that the installation of 1,500 bike parking rings on old meter posts has begun. This is a stimulus-funded project. Bike Denton has the story on a $15 million grant for bike lanes in Austin, Texas. And The Transport Politic asks, whose turn is it to lead transport planning?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

City Wants 20,000 New Parking Spaces in Hell’s Kitchen

|
It seems inconceivable given the overwhelmingly positive developments of the past few weeks, but the city wants to increase parking in Manhattan by some 20,000 spaces, and is defending itself in court for the right to do so. The Bloomberg and Spitzer administrations are working together to hold on to a rezoning provision that would […]

Doubts About DOT Congestion Prescription in Jax Heights

|
Community activists in Jackson Heights have been complaining about congestion at the corner at 73rd St. and 37th Ave. (right) for years. A major traffic study of the area is underway, but according to a DOT spokesman, the department didn’t want to wait to implement "short-term initiatives" that could ease the problem. Problem is, some […]

Plenty of Spaces, but “Nowhere to Park”

|
"There’s nowhere to park." That’s what a lot of drivers think, even when there is parking available very nearby — say, on the upper level of a parking garage. This disjunct between perception and reality, which can lead to municipalities overbuilding parking facilities that end up standing empty, is the topic of an intriguing post […]

Study: Loosening Parking Mandates Leads to More Affordable Housing

|
A recent study by Michael Manville at UCLA [PDF] has been making the rounds on the Streetsblog Network. Examining areas of Los Angeles where parking regulations had been loosened, Manville found that “when parking requirements are removed, developers provide more housing and less parking, and also that developers provide different types of housing: housing in […]