Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
112238400_82425abf91.jpgDon't plan for parking spaces the way you plan for these. (Photo: Admit One via Flickr)

Here's
the analogy of the day from the Streetsblog Network: Parking spaces are
like toilets -- at least for conventional planners.

That line comes from Reinventing Urban Transport, and while it's good for a laugh, it yields several important insights on closer examination.

Paul
Barter, the blog's author, has been thinking about the parallels
between parking spaces and toilets for several months now. Here are
some of the similarities that he notes:

    1. Both are treated as an essential ancillary service that every building will need.
    2. Itis usually assumed that no fee (or a token fee at most perhaps) will becharged. Remember, we are talking about the conventional approach toparking policy here. Some jurisdictions even ban fees for suchfacilities.
    3. There is thus little direct returnon the investments. So the private sector would under-provide themunless forced to. To the rescue come regulations in the form of parkingor toilet requirements in planning or building codes.

But
as Barter goes on to argue, planning for parking the way you do for
toilets is a fundamentally flawed approach. Here's how he starts
breaking it down:

    1. It is much more difficult to predict parking demand than to predicttoilet demand (which itself is not easy). The human need to expel wastechanges little (except when beer is consumed in large quantitiesperhaps). The demand for parking can change enormously over time as carownership changes and as mode choices shift.
    2. Everyone needs toilets. Only car users need parking. (But conventional parking policy assumes that 'car users' = 'everyone'.)
    3. Parkingtakes a lot more space than toilets. Forgive me for stating the obvioushere. It is common for American suburban office parks to be required tohave as much parking space as they have floor space for other uses.Buildings in Kuala Lumpur…or Bangkok often have a third or more oftheir floors devoted to parking. Parking standards often dramaticallylimit the density that is feasible on a site.

There's
a lot more to his original post, and Barter is looking for more
insights to help develop the idea -- which he finds has been quite
useful in presentations. Head on over to his site and offer your feedback.

More from around the network: The Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia reports that the installation of 1,500 bike parking rings on old meter posts has begun. This is a stimulus-funded project. Bike Denton has the story on a $15 million grant for bike lanes in Austin, Texas. And The Transport Politic asks, whose turn is it to lead transport planning?

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Talking Headway Podcast: 20 is Plenty in Wales

Welsh MP Lee Waters and the University of Sydney's Dr. Jennifer Kent on how Wales passed a national 20 mph speed limit.

February 6, 2025

Who is Trump’s FTA Pick Marc Molinaro — And Will He Kill Congestion Pricing?

If confirmed, Trump FTA pick Marc Molinaro can do a lot to gum up funding for mass transit across the country. Here's a look at his record.

February 6, 2025

This City Is Turning Bikes into Data-Collection Devices to Support More Bike Lanes

A recent high-tech pilot is helping one Michigan city make the case for low-tech safety technology that saves lives and gets people in the saddle.

February 6, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Clear Their Congestion

We know building more lanes doesn't work, so congestion pricing looks like the best way to actually reduce traffic.

February 6, 2025
See all posts