New Report Tracks Urban Transit Emissions — Where Does Your City Rank?

chartyy.pngComparing the average emissions per passenger mile of various transport modes. (Chart: FTA)

While state DOTs marked Earth Day by depicting roads as unsung heroes of livability, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the transit industry celebrated in their own ways by releasing reports on local rail and bus systems’ roles in reducing U.S. transport emissions.

The FTA’s updated report [PDF] on transit’s value in combating climate change includes average emissions for various modes of transportation (see above chart), calculated using the government’s National Transit Database. The emissions totals, which reflect average ridership estimates, show that transit averages about half the CO2 poundage per passenger mile of a single-occupancy vehicle.

But the FTA also breaks down individual transit systems’ average emissions, illustrating how much of a difference high ridership — and cleaner-burning sources of electricity — can make when it comes to the energy efficiency of local rail.

Take the San Francisco metro area’s heavy rail system, known as BART, which achieves average emissions of just 0.085 pounds of CO2 per passenger mile. That rock-bottom total is made possible by electricity generated largely through hydropower. Washington D.C.’s Metrorail, meanwhile, comes in at an average of 0.347 pounds of CO2, making it four times less efficient than BART.

The emissions numbers get worse in less trafficked rail networks, such as the Baltimore Metro (0.919 pounds of CO2 per passenger mile, an average comparable to a car) and Cleveland’s rapid rail transit (0.805 pounds of CO2/passenger mile).

Fortunately, the average emissions-cutting power of heavy rail is skewed by New York City, where nearly 60 percent of the mode’s U.S. passenger miles are traveled. New York’s subway gets an average of 0.147 pounds of CO2 per passenger mile, bolstering the local transit authority’s new estimate that it saves 17.4 million metric tons of emissions every year.

The FTA report found similar variability in the average emissions of local light rail, which ranged from uber-efficient in Los Angeles (0.219 pounds of CO2/passenger mile) and San Francisco (0.299 pounds of CO2/passenger mile) to middling in Dallas (0.534 pounds of CO2/passenger mile) and higher than the average single-occupancy auto in Pittsburgh (1.371 pounds of CO2/passenger mile). The weighted average for all American light rail, however, came in at 0.36 pounds of CO2 per passenger mile.

On the transit industry’s end, Earth Day brought a statement of support from President Obama that was echoed by American Public Transportation Association (APTA) chief William Millar. "Everyone who cares about the environment should care about public transportation," Millar said in a statement that accompanied a lengthy list of efficiency improvements underway at transit agencies across the country.


Highway-Affiliated Pew Climate Report Favors “Clean” Cars Over Transit

Many transportation reformers were disappointed last week when the Pew Center on Global Climate Change released a report indicating that only clean car technology had a shot at significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The report dismissed smart growth development strategies and transit as trivial contributors to a lower-carbon economy. Pew has a well-earned reputation for […]

How Much Driving Is Avoided When Someone Rides a Bike?

If Jane Doe rides her bike a mile to the post office and then back home, is it fair to assume she just avoided two miles of driving? And can we then assume that she prevented 2.2 pounds of carbon dioxide from being emitted? That’s more or less the way most agencies calculate averted vehicle-miles traveled. One […]