Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog

Parking Lots Shouldn’t Take Up Prime Streetfront Real Estate

2282056253_0b5dd5c914.jpgThe parking lot is behind these Boca Raton residences. (Photo: faceless b via Flickr)

It might seem like a simple idea -- that having an enormous parking lot in front of a business makes it unattractive to pedestrians and disrupts the fabric of a neighborhood. Unfortunately, this is the way that huge swaths of American towns and cities are designed.

This morning, Kaid Benfield at NRDC Switchboard posts about a relatively simple reversal that can make a real difference in the quality of a community's street life: Put the parking in the back. He concedes that it's not a solution for purists:

Some advocates might just wish that cars would go away entirely, or that communities make it so inconvenient or costly for their drivers that they dwindle in number.  But, for most places, that isn’t realistic and could even be counterproductive, chasing businesses out of central cities and exacerbating sprawl at a time when we should be doing the opposite. What we can realistically do is to make sure our buildings and streetscapes are fully supportive of environment- and community-friendly modes of travel. Placing the parking to the rear still allows access for drivers while attracting more walkers and transit users in front. 

That's the configuration that I encountered when visiting a relatively new neighborhood in Las Vegas a couple of weeks ago. The central shopping mall was designed with streetfront stores and an interior parking lot; on a pretty Sunday afternoon, it attracted a significant amount of foot traffic from the surrounding residences. The place is deeply car-dependent, but there was still a sense of neighborhood activity and interaction that is largely absent in developments where parking sits in front of retail. While people living there drive to work, they consider it normal to walk to a neighborhood café.

Perfect? No. Better? Definitely.

Benfield's post is well worth reading in full, so head on over.

More from around the network: Bike Friendly Oak Cliff has a harsh critique of a "complete street" plan in that Dallas community. DC Bicycle Transportation Examiner looks at the ratio of homicides by stranger to traffic fatalities (hint: the second number is higher). And WalkBikeJersey does some dispiriting math on fare hikes for bicyclists using transit in that state.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Got the Worried Blues

Transit agencies listen to that whistle blow. They're going where they never gone before.

July 17, 2024

Study: More Evidence That Safer Streets Don’t Hurt Local Business

...more insight into why people simply don't believe it.

July 17, 2024

Transit Planning Guru Jarrett Walker Discusses Chicago’s Transit Challenges

Walker, a consultant with the two system, talks about how to improve service. He won't "disagree with their managements in public," but says he's genuinely against the proposed merger.

July 16, 2024

Don’t Believe the Hydrogen Train Hype

Calling hydrogen-powered trains "zero emission" is misleading at best - and even if they were, they lost the race to be "first" a long time ago.

July 16, 2024

Tuesday’s Headlines Turn Up the Heat

Triple-digit heat, fueled by climate change, is warping rail lines, interrupting construction work on transit lines and causing burns on sidewalks.

July 16, 2024
See all posts