Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
High-speed rail

Celebration in California As White House Awards $2.3B for High-Speed Rail

In California, the state's bid for a federal high-speed rail network with top speeds exceeding 200 miles per hour is often called the "only true" bullet train proposal on the table -- and the Obama administration agreed today, bestowing $2.34 billion on the Golden State to the delight of lawmakers and rail advocates.

20091026134234_Preferred_state_102209pm.jpgGraphic: CHSRC (click to enlarge)

The largest share of the state's high-speed rail award, $2.25 billion, will go towards an Anaheim-to-San Francisco link that is expected to cost about $42 billion to complete.

Smaller grants were given to improve service on the San Diego-Los Angeles Surfliner route, the Capitol Corridor route from Sacramento to the Bay Area, and to give trains new emissions control equipment.

The White House grant is less than half the size of the state's initial $4.7 billion allocation, but the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) has the voter-approved ability to match the federal aid dollar for dollar.

U.S. High Speed Rail Association chief Andy Kunz praised the administration's decision to spread high-speed rail aid out among 13 different corridors, prodding states such as California to "get creative" and leverage other funding sources.

State are "all going to scramble, going to build their own money and support systems to get these things up and running," Kunz said in an interview.

Indeed, CHSRA chairman Curt Pringle hailed the funding decision, predicting that "it will benefit every single section of our planned high-speed rail system by moving this entire vision closer to reality."

California's case for White House rail money was also strengthened by bipartisan cooperation between Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and Democratic officials in Sacramento. Both sides of the aisle were elated at today's announcement.

The governor released a statement touting the upside of the state's shared approach. "California’s
leaders came together to support and submit one high-speed rail proposal and
because of that, $2.3 billion will now flow into the California
economy," Schwarzenegger said.

State Senate President pro tem Darrell Steinberg (D) used the moment to rally residents around continued investment in rail. "Today
the federal government showed confidence in the promise of this state," he said in a statement. "It is
up to us to deliver on that promise."

Meanwhile, Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) -- who joined Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA) to craft California's first high-speed rail legislation 20 years ago -- called the funding announcement "a great first step for a program that I will continue to fight hard
for in Congress in the months and years ahead."

Fighting for more funding will undoubtedly be key for California and other states facing budget crises even as they seek to build out inter-city rail networks in the coming years. Brian Stanke, executive director of the grassroots lobbying group Californians for High-Speed Rail, was already looking ahead to the next steps even as he hailed the state's victory. From his statement:

California is eligible for some of the $2.5 billion Congressappropriated last month for high speed rail, and we plan to lobby toconvince the Administration to release these funds quickly. Congress also needs to ensure that the jobs bill underconsideration includes several billion more for high speed rail in thenear term. Additionally, we urge California’s Congressional delegationto ensure the next transportation bill is passed this year and that itincludes a sustainable, long-term funding source for high speed railprojects.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Transit Advocates Aren’t 100% Behind This Senator’s Bold Bill To Slash Highway Funding

A new Republican bill could bring rampant highway overspending to a halt and slash emissions by one-fifth. But don't get too excited because it would hurt transit, too.

March 17, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Are Underwater

More and more people can't afford their car payments or associated costs — which wouldn't be as big of a problem if they had a choice other than driving.

March 17, 2026

What If The Rising Costs of Car Dependency Were As Visible As Gas Prices?

Gas station billboards remind U.S. residents every day that driving is getting more expensive. What if they told a different message about the high costs of our autocentric transportation system?

March 16, 2026

Hired Actors, Paid Media: Big Tech Has Dumped $8M Into Car Insurance Rate Cut

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's scheme to bring down insurance costs is backed by Uber cash and ads with professional actors.

March 16, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Zero In

Traffic deaths are going down, and they'd decline further if cities stopped letting residents block safety projects.

March 16, 2026

Trump’s Oil Crisis Is Already Costing Massachusetts Drivers Over $2.4 Million A Day In Higher Gas Prices

Massachusetts drivers are now cumulatively spending $20.9 million a day at the pump – more than twice the daily cost of operating the entire MBTA system.

March 13, 2026
See all posts