Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Federal Stimulus

The Case For a Merit-Based and Front-Loaded Infrastructure Bill

Even as much of official Washington pauses for the holiday weekend, the congressional winds keep shifting in favor of a job-creation bill that aims to front-load infrastructure spending between next year and the 2012 election.

moynihan_articlebox.jpgA rendering of the proposed Moynihan Station (Photo: The Real Deal)

In Minnesota this week, reporters heard House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) tell a local conference that he would introduce a two-year front-loaded bill next month and aim to follow up with a four-year transportation bill -- including the broad policy reforms he once hoped to pass in 2009.

Any near-term infrastructure legislation lacking those policy changes likely would run its money through existing federal transportation formulas that tend to favor roads over transit and don't include a "fix-it-first" mandate to prioritize repairs.

But even if Oberstar's long-term reforms are left out of a front-loaded bill, lawmakers are not doomed to use outmoded formulas that shortchanged urban areas during the early months of the economic stimulus effort.

A framework already exists for the merit-based selection of infrastructure projects: the TIGER grants, which offered $1.5 billion in stimulus money to transport plans that would create the most jobs and deliver the biggest livability benefits, whether they dealt with transit, ports, bridges, or roads.

The TIGER grants, which the U.S. DOT sees as a first step towards more accountable transportation funding, attracted a clamor of interest -- $57 billion in applications were filed for the $1.5 billion pot, including a bid to jump-start New York's long-planned Moynihan Station.

Given that Obama administration officials already have their TIGER evaluation process in place and are almost certain to turn down bids from otherwise worthy projects, Congress could easily expand the grant program as part of any front-loaded infrastructure stimulus.

Prioritizing employment and sustainability in the selection of transportation projects, rather than the same old funding formulas, would be a potent down payment on future federal reforms.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Are the Best of the Best

What does it take to turn the tide against the dominance of cars? These cities are an example.

October 8, 2025

This Newsroom Is Looking For Its Next Big Tip on the Train

Investigative journalists at ProPublica are betting that the next big tipster is riding the rails right now — and reaching out to find them.

October 8, 2025

Ending the Roadless Rule is Bad News for Public Lands

Federal officials want to bring more cars to public lands, causing environmental damage in the process.

October 8, 2025

The Shocking Untold History of America’s Rails-to-Trails Movement

Some of the fiercest battles for the future of public space in America have happened on abandoned railway corridors — and the battles aren't over yet.

October 7, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Take It Back

Withholding transit funds is just one aspect of the Trump administration's campaign to reshape the federal bureaucracy during the shutdown.

October 7, 2025

Commentary: Speed Cameras are a Good Start for Safe Streets

But *all* tools must be used to achieve Vision Zero —  not just speed cameras.

October 6, 2025
See all posts