Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog Capitol Hill

White House to Agencies: Prepare for Broad Spending Freeze or 5% Cut

Congressional deficit anxiety, always running high amid conservative Democrats, is reaching something of a fever pitch this week -- while the White House prepares to ask most federal agencies for two alternative budgets for the fiscal year that begins next fall: one that freezes spending and one with a 5 percent cut.

dot14_point.jpgU.S. DOT headquarters (Photo: Capitol Riverfront)

The Wall Street Journal has the details, as part of a larger report on the Obama administration's internal debate over whether to set aside unspent financial bailout money for deficit reduction:

The White House is in the early stages of considering what biggermoves it might make for next year's budget. The Office of Managementand Budget has asked all cabinet agencies, except defense and veteransaffairs, to prepare two budget proposals for fiscal 2011, which beginsOct 1, 2010. One would freeze spending at current levels. The otherwould cut spending by 5%.

OMB is also reviewing a host of tax changes. The President'sEconomic Recovery Advisory Board will submit tax-policy options by Dec.5, including simplifying the tax code and revamping the corporate taxcode.

Matt Yglesias tackles the political motivations behind the administration's efforts to project fiscal hawkishness while weighing new initiatives to combat rising joblessness ("without increasing the deficit"). But the signals of coming budget austerity at non-military federal agencies is another huge story in itself, and one that's bound to have significant implications for transportation policy.

The U.S. DOT made a budget request of $73.2 billion for fiscal year (FY) 2010, which began in October, compared with $68.2 billion during the final year of the Bush administration (FY 2009) and $70.3 billion in FY 2008. According to that data, a 5 percent cut would leave the agency's request above its FY 2009 level.

Once budget requests are forwarded to Capitol Hill, lawmakers get the final word on setting agency spending levels. But the administration's move -- which comes as more states face budget crises and find themselves at risk of losing federal matching funds for transportation -- suggests that a spending freeze may indeed be the best case scenario.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

The Missing Ingredients in America’s ‘Minimobility’ Revolution

Cargo trikes, GEMs, bike rickshaws, and other light electric vehicles could help wean America off cars — but a new grant that could help cities encourage their adoption is being paused by the Trump administration.

February 11, 2025

Who Benefits from Trump ‘Birthrate’ Funding Scheme? Wealthier, Whiter Drivers

This prioritization lacks evidence of how it will meet the memo’s stated purpose to “bolster the American economy and benefit the American people.”

February 11, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Man the Barricades

After the deadly New Year's Eve truck attack in New Orleans, how can cities better protect pedestrians from increasingly heavy and powerful vehicles?

February 11, 2025

Trump Can’t Legally Kill Congestion Pricing, But When Has That Ever Stopped Him?

New York's leaders can't take Donald Trump's threats to congestion pricing, and the constitutional order, lying down — but they might anyway.

February 11, 2025

Op-Ed: Amtrak Isn’t Profitable — And That’s Okay

"As a for-profit company, Amtrak fails ... spectacularly. As a government agency, created half a century ago to carry out a public purpose recognized in law and in Supreme Court rulings, it is a spectacular success worth celebrating, supporting, and building up."

February 10, 2025
See all posts