Oberstar Stands Firm on Transportation Bill, Gets Industry Backup
In case any doubts remained about his willingness to challenge the White House and the Senate on prompt passage of a long-term infrastructure bill, House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar's (D-MN) op-ed in the Politico this morning should clear them up:
House transport committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) (Photo: Capitol Chatter)Unfortunately, the administration and some in the Senate have suggestedan 18-month extension of the existing surface transportation programs.This approach does little more than delay the critical reforms anddifficult choices that must be made now.
Under this approach, come March 31, 2011, we would find ourselves facedwith the same decisions, the same outdated and inefficient programs andeven more costly investment needs in all modes of our transportationsystem. Moreover, given that the new deadline would come at the outsetof a new Congress, additional extensions are inevitable.
Worst of all, failure to pass a long-term surface transportationauthorization on time would bring significant uncertainty to states andMPOs that must plan critical projects years in advance. They requirelong-term funding assurances and stability from their federal partnersto proceed in this process.
Oberstar's commentary is strongly worded, but it stops short of vowing to stand in the way of a shorter-term delay in taking up a new federal transportation bill -- an outcome that appears all but certain given the 10 legislative days remaining until current law expires on September 30.
"Delay for the sake of delay is unacceptable," Oberstar concludes in the op-ed. That framing opens the door, if slightly, to a compromise on a delay that would give Congress' revenue-raising committees (Senate Finance and House Ways and Means) more time to devise a stable funding source for the bill.
Rep. Pete DeFazio (D-OR), Oberstar's chief subcommittee chairman, told The Hill on Friday that he hoped to see a three-month extension, which would put off work on a new bill until just after New Year's. Others in the capital believe a 12-month extension, as proposed by Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH), would have a stronger chance of success.
But DeFazio reiterated that Oberstar has yet to weigh in with his preferred timeframe. In the meantime, the chairman is getting backup from a broad array of transportation interest groups that operate under the aegis of the Freight Stakeholders Coalition.
The Coalition held a press conference this morning to reiterate its support for passage of a new long-term infrastructure bill this year. The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) was absent from the lineup, but representatives of the highway, rail, trucking, and port lobbies were in attendance, as was the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Monday’s Headlines Are For the Children
For the 1 billion children who live in cities worldwide, the streets are too dangerous for them to play outside.
The Explainer: What’s Next for Congestion Pricing?
Let's run through the major issues still looming over New York City's first-in-the-nation congestion toll.
How To Build a Car That Kills People: Cybertruck Edition
The Cybertruck represents a lot of what's wrong with the U.S. transportation system — even as it purports to address those problems.
Friday’s Headlines Don’t Feel the Need for Speed
Tell me again, which constitutional amendment is it that gives people the right to drive as fast as they want?
Komanoff: Congestion Pricing Fee Plan is Solid
Here’s what’s to like about the Traffic Mobility Review Board's central business district toll recommendations. It's a lot!
