Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
states460.gifNRDC's depiction of how hard states are hit by gas costs, ranked by percentage of income spent.

America's oil addiction is readily acknowledged, even by its biggest enablers. But what is the nation actually doing to kick the habit and embrace a safer, healthier, more realistic energy future? 

An attempt to answer that question was released today [PDF] by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which has ranked the "oil vulnerability" of the 50 states for three years running.

On its face, the list is unsurprising: Mississippi remains in first place, with the average driver spending more than 9 percent of annual income on gas, while Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut were rated the least oil-dependent states. Yet NRDC's analysis also offers some instructive tidbits:

    • New York is the overwhelming leader in transit -- but not much else. The state dedicated 41 percent of its federal transportation money to transit as opposed to roads in 2007, making it the benchmark by which NRDC measured all others. Yet that was only enough to hit No. 6 on the overall scale of sustainable energy use, thanks to the state's lack of a low-carbon or renewable fuel standard, action on smart growth, and incentives for hybrid vehicles.
    • New Jersey's transit spending may not be getting through to some of its drivers. The state ranked second behind New York with 30 percent of transport cash used on transit, but the state's average driver spent $2,286 on gas last year compared with $1,654 in New York. It's not due to a high state gas tax; New Jersey's is one of the lowest in the nation. 
    • Capitol Hill can set the pace for reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Only six states have set targets for shrinking their VMT, a goal that Transportation Secretary LaHood has called essential to fighting climate change. Without congressional passage of legislation making VMT reduction a national priority, it's difficult to see a majority of states taking action individually in the near term.
    • Reputations may be deceiving. Georgia, where all but 23 of 5,400 DOT employees focus on roads, saw its federal transit grants frozen this month due to financial mismanagement and spends less than 7 percent of its transport budget on transit. But the state ranked 17th on NRDC's list, just ahead of Minnesota -- the progressive-leaning home of House infrastructure committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D).

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Take the Wheel

If Jesus won't take it, maybe AI will.

December 3, 2025

Advocates Push for Safety in Next Surface Transportation Reauthorization

A much-anticipated annual survey of state road safety laws called on federal lawmakers to back up their colleagues work.

December 3, 2025

Report: NYC is Undercounting The E-Bike Boom

A new study from an MIT grad student shows that e-bikes are the most popular vehicle for those using New York City's bike lanes.

December 3, 2025

Agenda 2026: Will Zohran Mamdani’s Left-Progressive Backers Mobilize for Faster Buses?

New York's new mayor must mobilize the coalition that got him elected if he wants to avoid his recent predecessors' failure to speed up buses.

December 2, 2025

Opinion: One Less Lane Ought To Fix It

Federal inaction means states must lead on reducing emissions — but their reluctance to reallocate road space for cars may doom climate goals.

December 2, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Fight Fire With Fire

Berkeley, Calif., is far from the only city where the fire department dictates transportation policy.

December 2, 2025
See all posts