Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Cash for Clunkers

The Senate’s ‘Clunkers’ Vote: Who Crossed Party Lines? (UPDATED)

The "cash for clunkers" car trade-in rebates are alive and well today after an evening Senate vote to give the taxpayer-subsidized program $2 billion -- money that was supposed to go to clean-energy loans and will almost certainly be replaced by new spending.

060713_POL_markWarnerEX.jpgSen. Mark Warner (VA) was one of four Democrats to oppose an extension of "clunkers." (Photo: Slate)

The final vote was 60-37, with a handful of Democrats and Republicans switching sides to vote against their party leaders.

The GOP "clunker" backers were Sens. Bob Corker (TN), Olympia Snowe (ME), George Voinovich (OH), Kit Bond (MO), Susan Collins (ME), Lamar Alexander (TN), and Sam Brownback (KS) -- who yanked his support from the rebates' first iteration in June.

Democrats who opposed the "clunker" money were Sens. Claire McCaskill (MO), Patrick Leahy (VT), Mark Warner (VA), and Ben Nelson (NE).

Warner and Leahy were both openly skeptical of the program's merits. Warner told a local TV reporter in his state that he questioned the environmental value of the "clunkers" tax credit, adding that they should not become a "long-term ... stipend" for car buyers.

Leahy, in a statement explaining his vote, referenced the Obama administration's reluctance to release complete information about the individual sales being conducted under the "clunkers" banner:

[W]hile we know that cars are moving off sales lots and onto the road, we have yet to receive enough details about the current sales data to know the true story of whether this program is working as intended.

Late Update: McCaskill also sounded off on her reasons for opposing more clunkers money. "Remember, around 60,000 to 70,000 people are trading their cars in for new ones every month without this program," she wrote on her Tumblr blog.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

An Olympian Task: Replicating Paris’s Bike Boom in Los Angeles

The Olympics can help transform the streets of Los Angeles  — if they look to the example of Paris.

October 29, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Are a Clear and Present Danger

Rescinding the "endangerment finding" could not only exacerbate climate change, it could also throw entire industries into chaos.

October 29, 2025

What’s More Regressive: Modest Driving Surcharges to Help Fund Transit, or Forced Car Ownership?

Do Illinois state senators and reps really want to make the financial burden on their constituents less "regressive"? If so they can start by ensuring that as many people as possible can live their lives without spending $12,000 annually just to leave their homes.

October 28, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Pay High Prices for Highway Repairs

If the U.S. didn't spend so much money on repaving roads, there might be more left over for other things, like transit.

October 28, 2025

Op-Ed: The Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific Merger Is Wrong for Rail

This advocacy organization argues it's time to reject Wall Street's massive power grab and re-nationalize America's rails — before it's too late.

October 28, 2025

Crunching Numbers to Curb Crashes: Using Federal Data to Make Our Roads Safer

Upholding federal data transparency is key to understanding and reversing the alarming level of crashes, fatalities, and strained infrastructure. Here's where we have more work to do.

October 28, 2025
See all posts