Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Climate Change

Big Auto’s Fuel Economy Plateau is Especially Bad News for Pedestrians

It's our annual December donation drive. Please give from the heart (and wallet!) by clicking above or here. Thanks.

Average fuel economy on new U.S. vehicles hit a troubling plateau last year — and the reason why is particularly bad news for vulnerable road users, in addition to the planet at large.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency's annual Automotive Trends report, the average real-world fuel economy for model year 2021 vehicles remained at 25.4 miles per gallon, which is the exact same number the agency reported for model year 2020. Grams of CO2 emissions per mile remained essentially flat, too, falling about a half a percent over the same period.

The EPA put a sunny spin on the news, pointing out that the last two years' emissions rates are the lowest ever measured, even if progress appears to have stalled. The agency also noted, though, that average vehicle weight, footprint and horsepower have also hit record highs — and that "market shifts away from cars and towards sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and pick-ups have offset some of the fleetwide benefits."

In addition to undermining efforts to curb climate change, the federal vehicle class known as "light trucks" is widely regarded as a leading driver of U.S. pedestrian deaths, which surged 46 percent between 2010 and 2019 as SUV sales took off. Studies have shown that when SUV drivers, in particular, strike children, they are eight times more likely to kill them than motorists who choose sedans, hatchbacks, and other cars instead, in part because of those vehicle's aggressive front-end design.

Graphic: EPA

Sustainable transportation advocates were also quick to point out that the emissions impact of megacars weren't simply the result of "market shifts," but the inevitable consequence of regulatory failures they've been calling out for decades.

Under the infamous "light truck loophole," automakers are subject to more lax fleetwide emissions standards if the portfolio of vehicles they sell includes a large percentage of the largest and deadliest cars on the road. The carveout, which was originally intended as a concession to the tiny slice of American workers who actually need heavy-duty vehicles to do their jobs, instead enabled automakers to sell passenger mega-cars to Americans unlikely to ever haul much more than a load of groceries — all without running afoul of environmental standards during an era of accelerating climate change.

And because it doesn't really cost all that much more to build a big car than a small one — one study estimated that the profit margins on SUVs are 40 to 51 percent higher than hatchbacks and sedans, mostly thanks to hefty mark-ups on luxury vehicle features — car manufacturers have a powerful incentive to dive into the light truck loophole headfirst. And their customers, in turn, have a powerful incentive to pay a premium for heavier and heavier "light" trucks, particularly as all their neighbors buy megacars that are more likely to kill the occupants of smaller vehicles in a crash.

The new EPA report noted some automakers are pursuing the SUV market so aggressively that they have actually increased their per-mile pollution between 2016 and 2021, forcing those companies to purchase emissions credits from greener ones or rely on credits that they'd banked in the past. Mazda reported the largest increase, thanks to the company's decision to roughly double the percentage of SUVs in its fleet over the past five years, though it still landed them slightly below the industry average; automakers GM and Stellantis, meanwhile, increased their already-chart-topping emissions levels even more.

Rather than waiting on unlikely "market shifts" to clean up a dirty transportation sector or de-escalate the SUV arms race on American roads, perhaps regulators should recognize how deeply interrelated the traffic violence and climate crises are — and finally take real action to end them.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Tuesday’s Headlines Went the Wrong Way

Multi-lane one-way streets: bad. Single-lane two-way streets: good.

February 24, 2026

What It Would Take to Map Every Sidewalk In Your State

States and tech companies keep detailed records of virtually every driving lane in America — but not every sidewalk. Until now.

February 24, 2026

New Calif. Legislation, Backed by Bike Safety Groups, Proposed to Regulate E-Motos/E-Bikes

Electric bicycles are transforming how Californians get around, but the rapid rise of high-powered electric devices has created confusion that puts people at risk,” said Marc T. Vukcevich, Director of State Policy for Streets For All.

February 23, 2026

The Wonders of Biking in Taiwan

One of San Francisco's most notable urbanists explores Taipei's night markets and bike infrastructure. He wonders: can San Francisco adopt their biking culture?

February 23, 2026

Why Is the Governor of New York Trying to Make It Easier to Deny Traffic Violence Victims Insurance Payouts?

The governor is still fighting to make it cheaper to drive with a reform that would reduce compensation to some crash victims.

February 23, 2026

Study: Most Of America’s Paint-Only Bike Paths Are On Our Deadliest Roads

Even worse, most Americans see these terrible lanes and think, "I'd be crazy to ride a bike" — and the cycle continues.

February 23, 2026
See all posts