Asheville Won’t Let North Carolina DOT Jam a Road Widening Through City Neighborhoods
North Carolina DOT was doing what the agency has always done when it came into Asheville and started making plans to widen Merrimon Avenue.
Merrimon is a busy four-lane commercial street, and NCDOT wants to add a center turn lane to keep cars and trucks moving. It’s bad news for people who’ll have to brave longer crossing distances and faster traffic on foot or a bicycle.
But the people who live nearby say the old way of thinking about streets like Merrimon isn’t good enough. They don’t want to cram through more motor vehicles at the expense of people who walk and bike.
There’s not much public support for widening Merrimon, according to the Citizen Times. NCDOT’s plan doesn’t comply with the city’s bike plan or the state’s Vision Zero goals. Asheville on Bikes, the local bike advocacy group, has been leading a campaign against it.
And the city of Asheville agrees.
Asheville officials are countering the NCDOT plan with a design to improve walking and biking. The city “is not in support of the project as proposed” and wants “alternative design concepts that integrate safety, mobility, and improved urban design,” Asheville Director of Transportation Ken Putnam wrote in his official comments to the state [PDF].
In the city government’s comments to NCDOT [PDF], Asheville officials propose shaving down the number of motor vehicle lanes from four to three, including a center turn lane:
This project can balance the automotive needs and also improve safety, enhance the pedestrian experience, provide a safe alternative for bicyclists, and support the existing urban land uses with streetscape improvements, potentially adding benches and pedestrian-scale lighting along wider sidewalks that include street trees. Improving the environment to make it more attractive for business should be a key element of the design.
The city notes that similar “road diets” have been implemented in Charlotte, San Diego, and Santa Monica, California, on roads with a comparable motor vehicle traffic. Those projects resulted in major safety improvements, with crash rates falling between 20 and 90 percent.
Every time I drive down Merrimon, I talk about how it needs a road diet! We don’t live there, but we go to Asheville to visit family who live a couple turns off Merrimon, and I’ve even been talking it up with them explaining how it could make it incredibly better for walking and biking, without having much impact on vehicular throughput. I looked into the ADT, and it is on the higher end of what FHWA approves for 3-4, but still within the range. I’d love to see this happen!
Excellent. Thank you for this article on Asheville’s challenges. There are two opposing arguments. Those that think more lanes are necessary to avoid delays and those that say it’s too dangerous in this urban area and we need a livable, walkable, bikeable street design to enable a shift in transport modes. If this stroad get’s a diet and shrinks from 4 to 2 lanes with a center turn lane I wonder how it will handle the 20,000 plus vehicles a day that use it. I’m hoping some will use alternatives, and there are alternatives for some commuters. I’m also hoping that more neighbors will walk and bike to area businesses, improving the economy and street scene. The challenges are many, especially the fact that this is a 1/2 mile section in the middle of a long street, most of which is pretty inhospitable to bikers and walkers. Thoughts?
The fact that they would have to condemn some businesses shows how stupid the idea is. We have to destroy the corridor to save it. The road has horrible access management, poor mode share accommodation, and becomes two-lane residential at the northern end. Diet the thing.
Great. now can we focus on destroying the monster 1 26 Connector 4B plan please? Don’t Wreck Asheville!
Also consider raising the bike lane a few inches like the sidewalk.