It Just Got Easier for Cities to Design Walkable, Bikeable Streets

The federal government threw out 11 rules that prevented cities from building walkable streets Photo: NJbikeped.org
The federal government threw out 11 rules that prevented cities from building walkable streets. Photo: NJbikeped.org

We probably haven’t seen the last of engineers who insist on designing local streets like surface highways. But at least now they can’t claim their hands are tied by federal regulations.

Last week, the Federal Highway Administration struck 11 of the 13 design rules for “national highways” — a 230,000-mile network of roads that includes many urban streets.

The rule change eliminates a major obstacle to safe street design around the country. The old rules applied highways design standards — wide lanes, no trees — to streets that function more like main streets, with terrible consequences for safety and walkability.

In October, FHWA proposed eliminating all but two of the old standards on streets designed for speeds under 50 mph, citing a lack of evidence that the rules improve safety. Now, those changes are official.

Ian Lockwood, a consultant with the Toole Design Group and formerly the transportation director for West Palm Beach, Florida, said the changes are important. The new rules open the door to treatments like road diets, bike lanes, and street trees — the kind of street designs that lead to a safe pedestrian environment, not high-speed traffic.

“This allows the designs to better support the place and not so much how fast people can drive through it,” he said.

In his career, Lockwood has often worked with residents who want their streets “to facilitate exchange, social exchange, economic exchange,” only to run up against what he calls “technical brushoff” from other engineers. “The big one was ‘Federal Highways won’t let us do that,'” he said. “Now we have a lot more freedom to do cool stuff.”

Prior to the change, if local agencies decided to make car lanes that were narrower than what the feds prescribed, they would have to go through the expensive and time-consuming process of applying for an exemption. New Haven, Connecticut, for example, had to apply for more than half a dozen exemptions when it designed a surface boulevard to replace a grade-separated section of Route 34.

After the new regulations were first proposed in October, the FHWA received 2,327 public comments. The feedback was overwhelmingly supportive, the agency says, with only seven people opposed.

Lockwood thinks the update is a good sign about the direction FHWA is steering federal transportation policy. “What used to be a very, very highway-oriented group are now trying to help,” he said.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Tell FHWA You Want Safer Designs for City Streets

|
Earlier this fall, the Federal Highway Administration proposed a major policy change: Instead of requiring roads that receive federal funding to be designed like highways, the agency would change its standards to allow greater flexibility. The implications for urban streets were huge — with less red tape, cities would have a much easier time implementing safer designs for walking […]

FHWA Endorses Engineering Guide for Walkable Urban Streets

|
Urban streets serve a much different purpose than rural ones: They’re for walking, socializing, and local commerce, not just moving vehicles. Unfortunately, American engineering guides tend not to capture these nuances. That can lead to a lot of problems for cities. Wide roads appropriate for rural areas are dangerous and bad for local businesses in […]

Op-Ed: Reimagining Walking Distance

|
The infrastructure bill presents a great opportunity to make our towns and cities more walkable. But we must ensure that the money is used for building better pedestrian and bike infrastructure instead of wasted on highway expansion projects.

Feds Propose Major Rule Changes to Eliminate Barriers to Safer Streets

|
Applying highway design standards to city streets has been a disaster for urban neighborhoods. The same things that make highways safer for driving at 65 mph — wide lanes, “clear zones” running alongside the road that have no trees or other “obstacles” — make surface streets dangerous and dreadful for walking, killing street life. The one-size-fits-all approach to […]