Koch Brothers Tentacles Reach Out to Squelch Albuquerque BRT

Albuquerque has a plan for bus rapid transit. But is it getting a fair hearing? Photo: City of Albuquerque
Albuquerque has a plan for bus rapid transit, and there’s a hired gun out to kill it. Photo: City of Albuquerque

Albuquerque, like many cities, is looking at bus rapid transit as a cost-effective way to improve mobility and create a more walkable city. Its BRT plan calls for frequent service on a center-running bus lane along Central Avenue, the city’s busiest bus route, which passes through the heart of downtown.

The city has applied for funding from the Federal Transit Administration’s Small Smarts program. With $80 million in federal funds matched by $20 million in local funds, service could begin in 2017.

But the local conversation about the project has been hijacked by outside groups with an anti-transit agenda. The most outspoken critics are a couple of men with financial ties to — are you ready? — the Koch brothers, fitting a pattern recently seen in NashvilleBoston, and a lot of other places.

The first is Paul Gessing from the Rio Grande Foundation, the group leading organized opposition to the project. The Rio Grande Foundation is part of the State Policy Network, which the Center for Media and Democracy describes as “mini-Heritage Foundations” that are “major drivers of the right-wing, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)-backed corporate agenda in state houses nationwide, with deep ties to the Koch brothers and the national right-wing network of funders.”

Naturally, the Rio Grande Foundation trotted out professional transit basher Randall O’Toole — of the Koch-backed Cato Institute — who tweaked his anti-rail road show in this case to criticize the bus plan.

Randal O'Toole of the Koch Brothers' funded Cato Institute is trotting out the same old arguments against Albuquerque bus rapid transit. Photo: Cato
Randal O’Toole of the Cato Institute is trotting out the same old arguments against Albuquerque bus rapid transit. Photo: Cato

In the Albuquerque Journal, O’Toole said “transit will never be important in Albuquerque because Albuquerque jobs and residences are too spread out,” pointing out that only 1.75 percent of the city uses transit to get to work. (This actually sounds like a great argument for improving bus service as a means to make the city more walkable and draw more riders, but we digress). The city pointed out in its rebuttal that about 5 to 9 percent of the people living around the project rely on transit. The three bus routes serving the corridor carry about 10,000 passengers a day, or 44 percent of system ridership. Buses are frequently overcrowded and delayed during peak hours.

Despite the cartoonishness of O’Toole’s arguments, he and Gussing are dominating the debate right now, says Dan Majewski of Urban ABQ, which represents downtown residents. A group of business owners along the corridor concerned with the removal of parking spaces and the disruption caused by construction are now aligning with the Rio Grande Foundation.

“What are the legitimate concerns of the small businesses and what are the basically anti-transit concerns that are coming from outside the city?” Majewski said. “It’s really hard to distinguish what is what.”

City of Albuquerque
A busway on Central Avenue would also reduce speeding and add much-needed pedestrian islands. City of Albuquerque [PDF]
Even members of Urban ABQ have some concerns about the proposal, Majewski said. But they think the pros and cons should be discussed in an atmosphere that’s not tainted by O’Toole’s brand of propaganda.

The project is modeled after successful bus rapid transit projects like Cleveland’s Healthline, which has been credited with spurring billions of dollars in development along its route. Majewski said one of the more attractive elements of the project is that it will result in a road diet on Central, which is the most dangerous street for pedestrians in Albuquerque (which is one of the most dangerous cities for walking in the country).

Writing in the Albuquerque Journal, columnist Winthrop Quigley touched on a larger issue: the need to rethink transportation in the city and create spaces in Albuquerque that bring people together:

Our city is a collection of mostly nondescript subdivisions connected by monotonous commercial strips, a concrete desert of very wide streets and hectares of parking lots. Officials like Mayor Richard J. Berry and Councilor Isaac Benton hope to capitalize on some of our distinctive neighborhoods to create an urban environment that will attract the people who will help create our city’s next economy.

It would be a shame if the discussion Albuquerque residents want to have about their future gets drowned out by hired guns from out of town.

65 thoughts on Koch Brothers Tentacles Reach Out to Squelch Albuquerque BRT

  1. “Hosting a national transportation expert” would be inviting David Gunn or Phillip Washington or maybe if you’re willing to go a bit more political, Jarrett Walker or Donald Shoup.

    O’Toole has been explained before: he’s a paid-for hack who will simply make stuff up in order to oppose rail and opposes buses.

  2. Canada has historically had a much stronger “anti-idiot” vote than the US. (Sigh.) When one side’s policies are just whackadoodle, Canada is more likely to toss the bums out.

    This is probably why crack-smoking mayor Rob Ford managed to lose his bid for re-election.

    The US seems capable of embracing whackadoodle for *decades*, much to our detriment.

  3. As much as I dislike the Koch brothers, they have, unintentionally, come down on the right side of an issue.

    BRT is a hoax. It’s a way to claim that you’re putting in mass transit without actually doing it. It’s very cheap, but it doesn’t attract new transit riders which is what’s necessary to reduce traffic.

    If there’s one good thing about BRT is that once it fails you can still use the buses for something else so at least the money for the vehicles was not wasted.

  4. Problem is, Mr. Gessing is ALSO a paid hack. He doesn’t live in Albuquerque, and he doesn’t represent its interests. He represents the interests of the fossil fuel industry and the greedy brothers Koch.

  5. Do you have to be a smug little millennial to post on this blog, because it appears that 90% or so of the comments would have that attribution.

  6. Also, Harry it looks like it was designed by a deranged clown, with polka-dot walkways and “canopies” that look like a partially collapsed circus tent. And yes, it will fail, but then all the people who have “taken the money and ran” can say, “Well, yes, but…So long, suckers!”

  7. And you don’t believe that this idiotic plan for Albuquerque Rapid Transit is anything other than a big payday for local fat cats, do you? So, P.T. Barnum was right…..

  8. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. And probably don’t even live in Albuquerque.

  9. If you think Central Avenue looks empty and bleak now wait until the affected businesses leave. If you don’t want to drive, don’t. But, I’ll bet you are one of the whiners who never ride the bus anyway.

  10. Mr. Gruber, I agree wholeheartedly! The issue should be voted on by the citizens of Albuquerque, not handed down by executive fiat by the Mayor and other political cronies who stand to benefit. Judging from the meetings I have been to, this idiotic project would be squashed once and for all.

  11. Why is it idiotic?

    If you think there is outright corruption going on, please, go right ahead and prove it.

    I think you’re just against public transportation regardless of the form it comes in. Young people are leaving Albuquerque left, right, and center for cities similarly sized to ABQ but with stronger economies and stronger… you guessed it: public transportation.

    If you’re okay with the current status quo of Albuquerque, then by all means oppose this project. And, yes, people will make money off of the building of this project. Just like ANY development project. If you’re against that, but are unable to prove any corruption, then you need to get over it.

  12. Have some respect, human. I’m in my forties, was raised here since I was three years old (yeah, young enough that I wasn’t driving yet). I work downtown. So yeah, I know what I’m talking about, you twit. Now stop trolling every message you see here and do something productive with your life.

  13. Judging by parcel vacancy and urban decay on Central Ave (except downtown and at UNM), affected businesses have already left long before BRT was even an idea.

    I see from your profile you’re a frequent commenter on Breitbart News Network. Welcome to the world outside the echo chamber!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


“A Game Changer” for Albuquerque: Bus Rapid Transit Is a Go

Recently, Albuquerque has gotten a good look at the insanity that can grip people when confronted by the idea of reallocating street space from cars to transit. The city is planning to add center-running bus lanes along Central Avenue — its main street — and for months public meetings about the project featured people standing on chairs and shouting, actual fights, and the […]

Fresno BRT Threatened By Last-Minute Smear Campaign

The city of Fresno, California, is a sprawling place, not known for having a strong transit system. But it’s been making big strides. Last year, this city of 500,000 passed a “general plan” that called for 45 percent of new development to be “infill,” or built in already developed areas. The plan relies on beefing […]

State Interference in Nashville BRT Could Have National Implications

Annie Weinstock is the regional director for the U.S. and Africa at the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Last week saw the quiet death of the misguided, Koch brothers-funded Tennessee Senate Bill 2243, which would have effectively banned real bus rapid transit in Tennessee. The Senate’s outrageous overreach, attempting to prohibit transit from using dedicated […]