Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Parking

New Research: People Ride Transit More Where Parking Costs Are Higher

It seems logical enough: In cities where parking costs are higher, more people ride transit. That's the major finding from a recent study published in the Journal of Public Works and Management Policy.

Photo: Huffington Post
Photo: Huffington Post
Photo: Huffington Post

But this type of empirical evidence is actually rare, in part because of the difficulty of obtaining data about public parking rates across U.S. cities. In addition, researchers found that transit use and parking rates were strongly correlated only in certain types of cities.

Researchers gathered data on parking rates and fines in 107 different public jurisdictions and cross-referenced it with local transit ridership. They found that in large cities -- defined as cities with a population density of 6,200 people per square mile or higher -- there was a strong relationship. Among these cities, places with high parking costs -- defined through a combination of rates, fines, and fees -- were associated with a 2.3-fold increase in public transit passenger miles per person, when adjusted for local economic factors like poverty rates and gas prices. ("Large cities," by this definition, would include Los Angeles and Baltimore but not Pittsburgh or Houston.)

In smaller cities, however, the correlation between parking costs and transit ridership was not statistically significant. The authors hypothesized that this could be the result of poor transit availability, high fares, and/or sprawling land use.

Rachel Weinberger, one of the study's authors, told Streetsblog that smaller cities may have so much excess off-street parking that it's impossible to detect an effect. "One of the things that we see in smaller cities, generally the zoning code requires about twice as much parking as the busiest parts of the city actually need," she said. "So there’s no price or supply restriction, so it doesn’t wind up being a binding consideration when someone’s making a decision."

The researchers found that cities across the board charge relatively low rates for on-street parking. The average meter price was $1.17 per hour. Only about 25 percent of larger cities charged more than $2 per hour. Weinberger said that the lack of variability made it difficult to draw conclusions based on curb prices. "The meter price could be a dollar an hour in New York and a dollar an hour in Omaha," she said.

Off-street parking rates vary more. They tend to be significantly higher in larger cities -- $6 per hour and $17 per day -- and lower in smaller cities -- $3 per hour and $10 per day.

The authors characterize their research as an exploratory study that they hope will lead to further research into the relationship between parking incentives and transit use.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Guess Which Argument Can Get a NIMBY To Change Their Mind About New Housing

Put your instincts to the test with this fascinating experiment about the power of messaging to win support for urbanism.

March 20, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Growing St. Louis’s Arts and Culture District

This week on Talking Headways, step inside St. Louis's Grand Center Arts District with the people who make it happen.

March 19, 2026

Advocates Get D.C. Mayor To Release Buried Report On The Potential Benefits Of Congestion Pricing

How many other conversations about congestion pricing across the country are being suppressed — and how many have never even gotten started?

March 19, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines Lift All Boats

Contrary to many drivers' beliefs, bike lanes don't just benefit a handful of cyclists.

March 19, 2026

California Must Stop Expanding Highways 

While transit, bike, and safety projects struggle for funding, the state keeps writing blank checks for freeway widening boondoggles. It's time to tell our lawmakers: enough!

March 18, 2026

Why Some Members of Congress Want to Go Big on Greenways

A new bill would multiply federal funding for walking and biking paths — even as some powerful congresspeople threaten to take away what we've already got.

March 18, 2026
See all posts