Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Study: Parking Minimums Cost Seattle Renters $246 a Month

In Seattle, it's now legal in certain neighborhoods to build apartment buildings with no parking. By saving on parking costs, owners can offer lower rents, and developers say there are waiting lists for parking-free buildings.

Almost 40 percent of parking spaces in Seattle-area apartment buildings are empty at night. Image: ##http://www.westseattleherald.com/2013/12/12/news/meeting-about-no-parking-apartments-california-ge## West Seattle Herald##
Almost 40 percent of parking spaces in new Seattle-area apartment buildings are empty at night. Image: ##http://www.westseattleherald.com/2013/12/12/news/meeting-about-no-parking-apartments-california-ge##West Seattle Herald##
false

But in most neighborhoods, Seattle still has laws that require a certain number of parking spaces per housing unit. According to recent research by the Sightline Institute [PDF], those parking minimums are costing Seattle residents dearly. Erica C. Barnett at Network blog PubliCola outlines the findings:

Sightline found that in its survey of 23 recently built apartment buildings, 37 percent of spaces were empty at night, the time of day when you'd expect parking to be in highest demand. In four developments, there were more than twice as many parking spaces as parked cars (meaning more than half the spaces were empty). On average, the buildings in the survey had 20 percent more apartments than cars, meaning that if car-owning renters averaged one car per apartment (a conservative estimate if you take seriously parking advocates' claim that many small-apartment dwellers have multiple cars), only 80 percent of renters owned cars.

And here's the problem with all that extra, unused parking: Everybody, including people who don't own a car, pays for it. "Free" parking adds about 15 percent to the cost of renting an apartment -- in Seattle, about $246 a month.

But the actual cost of unneeded parking to Seattle renters is even bigger than that, study author Clark Williams-Derry concludes:

Regardless of the reasons for the parking glut, the fact that developers provide abundant (and often unneeded) on-site parking significantly increases the supply-side costs of building new multifamily rental housing. Economic theory posits that higher supply-side costs reduce the amount of new housing that is built.

Less housing makes competition among renters more intense. That leads to higher prices for all renters in markets with minimum parking requirements, whether they drive or not.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Cyclelicious introduces the Florida candidate for governor who's making bike safety a key part of his campaign. The City Fix says Brazil is moving to add a "right to transportation" to its constitution. And Together North Jersey outlines the city of Paterson's plan to use urban design to minimize crime.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Trump, Republicans Make D.C. Ground Zero in Their War on Cities

The Trump administration is bullying D.C. — and other cities (looking at you, New York) could soon fall in the crosshairs, advocates say.

March 20, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Won’t Pay For Themselves

The idea that transportation infrastructure should pay for itself is a conservative one, until it isn't.

March 20, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Continue Resolving

There isn't much for transit in the continuing resolution Congress passed last week to fund the government for six months.

March 19, 2025

Is the Overnight Train A Luxury or a Necessity?

Before the advent of the car in the 1960s, sleeper trains were America's primary method of long-distance transportation — but today, it's more often seen as a luxury. Is it time for that to change? With the recent fear of air traveling, is the time for a sleeper train's comeback?

March 19, 2025

Advocates Resist SF Transit Cuts

Is this a transit-first city? Or a cut-transit-first city?

March 18, 2025
See all posts