Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Auto Makers

GM Bailout Will Cost Taxpayers as Much as $12 Billion

"Government Motors" no more. The federal government is calling in its loans to General Motors, which received a taxpayer-funded injection of almost $50 billion at the height of the financial meltdown in 2008.

The auto bailout cost taxpayers a bundle, but it helped Obama win reelection. Photo: ##http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/19/its-official-taxpayers-will-lose-big-on-the-gm-bailout## U.S. News and World Report##

Over the next 12 to 15 months, President Obama says the world's largest automaker, which has been turning a healthy profit since 2010, must buy back its remaining 500 million shares from the government. But, unlike the bank bailouts, the government rescue of GM won't result in a payout for its taxpaying saviors.

The federal government will receive only the going share prices, currently about $27, for its investment -- about half of the purchase price of roughly $54 a share. US News and World Report estimates the bailout of GM will cost taxpayers between $10 and $12 billion.

So, chalk up another big subsidy for driving. Taxpayers also lost $1.3 billion on the bailout of Chrysler. And then there was the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program -- another stimulus-era subsidy for the auto industry.

There's a fair argument to be made that the economic fallout from the dissolution of General Motors -- which employs 202,000 people worldwide -- during the lowest point of the worst recession in generations would have been disastrous. But the $10-$12 billion bailout is another indication of the high cost of America's auto dependence.

Remember, this wasn’t the first time U.S. taxpayers bailed out the domestic auto industry. In 1980, Chrysler — reeling from the U.S. oil embargo — received $1.5 billion from the government. It will be interesting to see whether the American auto industry, when it faces the next collapse in demand for its product, will again be the beneficiary of a taxpayer-financed insurance policy against financial collapse.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

How One Artist Is Helping Neighbors Decide How Their City Should Sound

An Italian researcher is challenging tactical urbanists to think about sound — and helping neighborhoods imagine something better for their auditory environments.

November 5, 2025

PART III: Policy Solutions to the E-Moto Problem

What happens when existing state laws don’t quite seem to fit newer types of electric motor vehicles that are being sold and used? How should we address this problem? Here's Part III of our series.

November 5, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Breathe in the Air

Congratulations, you have a slightly less chance of developing dementia due to half-hearted efforts to curb climate change.

November 5, 2025

Study: Why Can’t San Francisco Plant More Street Trees?

Advocates fight for greenery in their neighborhoods and ask the question: why is the city ripping out more trees than it's putting in?

November 4, 2025

Is a ‘Life After Cars’ Really Possible?

"This book is an invitation to imagine a better world in which people are put before cars," says co-author Sarah Goodyear.

November 4, 2025

PART II: Unpacking the Risks for Riders and Families of Illegal E-Motos

In this second installment of our series, we examine the legal, financial, and safety risks that e-moto riders and their families face every day.

November 4, 2025
See all posts