Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Auto Makers

GM Bailout Will Cost Taxpayers as Much as $12 Billion

"Government Motors" no more. The federal government is calling in its loans to General Motors, which received a taxpayer-funded injection of almost $50 billion at the height of the financial meltdown in 2008.

The auto bailout cost taxpayers a bundle, but it helped Obama win reelection. Photo: ##http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/19/its-official-taxpayers-will-lose-big-on-the-gm-bailout## U.S. News and World Report##

Over the next 12 to 15 months, President Obama says the world's largest automaker, which has been turning a healthy profit since 2010, must buy back its remaining 500 million shares from the government. But, unlike the bank bailouts, the government rescue of GM won't result in a payout for its taxpaying saviors.

The federal government will receive only the going share prices, currently about $27, for its investment -- about half of the purchase price of roughly $54 a share. US News and World Report estimates the bailout of GM will cost taxpayers between $10 and $12 billion.

So, chalk up another big subsidy for driving. Taxpayers also lost $1.3 billion on the bailout of Chrysler. And then there was the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program -- another stimulus-era subsidy for the auto industry.

There's a fair argument to be made that the economic fallout from the dissolution of General Motors -- which employs 202,000 people worldwide -- during the lowest point of the worst recession in generations would have been disastrous. But the $10-$12 billion bailout is another indication of the high cost of America's auto dependence.

Remember, this wasn’t the first time U.S. taxpayers bailed out the domestic auto industry. In 1980, Chrysler — reeling from the U.S. oil embargo — received $1.5 billion from the government. It will be interesting to see whether the American auto industry, when it faces the next collapse in demand for its product, will again be the beneficiary of a taxpayer-financed insurance policy against financial collapse.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

OPINION: What Do You Call a Cyclist Who’s Been Hit By an E-Biker?

Much as our contributor hates to admit it, she thinks twice every time she gets on her bike since being hit by an e-bike.

August 19, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Open Their Wallets

State and local governments shouldn't have to scrounge around for transit funding, according to Transportation for America.

August 19, 2025

Opinion: Too-Fast Riders Could Be The Downfall of E-Bike Culture

Out-of-class e-bikes are getting faster and more dangerous. How will it impact the image of slow-speed, pedal-assist vehicles — or even the faster riders who are responsibly sharing the road with cars?

August 19, 2025

Advocates: Here’s What to Tell The Feds You Want From the Next Big Transportation Bill

You only have two more days to comment on the next surface transportation bill (the biggie!). So here are some thoughts about what you should say.

August 18, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Are Lukewarm, Neither Hot Nor Cold

Do micromobility devices that can reach speeds of up to 20 miles per hour, or even 60, belong on sidewalks, in bike lanes, on streets with cars or somewhere else?

August 18, 2025

Armchair Urbanist Reviews Basics of California HSR

In case you haven't heard, this is getting built with or without the feds -- and the Armchair Urbanist has some ideas on how to get it done faster that don't involve changing the alignment.

August 15, 2025
See all posts