Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Auto Makers

GM Bailout Will Cost Taxpayers as Much as $12 Billion

"Government Motors" no more. The federal government is calling in its loans to General Motors, which received a taxpayer-funded injection of almost $50 billion at the height of the financial meltdown in 2008.

The auto bailout cost taxpayers a bundle, but it helped Obama win reelection. Photo: ##http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/19/its-official-taxpayers-will-lose-big-on-the-gm-bailout## U.S. News and World Report##

Over the next 12 to 15 months, President Obama says the world's largest automaker, which has been turning a healthy profit since 2010, must buy back its remaining 500 million shares from the government. But, unlike the bank bailouts, the government rescue of GM won't result in a payout for its taxpaying saviors.

The federal government will receive only the going share prices, currently about $27, for its investment -- about half of the purchase price of roughly $54 a share. US News and World Report estimates the bailout of GM will cost taxpayers between $10 and $12 billion.

So, chalk up another big subsidy for driving. Taxpayers also lost $1.3 billion on the bailout of Chrysler. And then there was the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program -- another stimulus-era subsidy for the auto industry.

There's a fair argument to be made that the economic fallout from the dissolution of General Motors -- which employs 202,000 people worldwide -- during the lowest point of the worst recession in generations would have been disastrous. But the $10-$12 billion bailout is another indication of the high cost of America's auto dependence.

Remember, this wasn’t the first time U.S. taxpayers bailed out the domestic auto industry. In 1980, Chrysler — reeling from the U.S. oil embargo — received $1.5 billion from the government. It will be interesting to see whether the American auto industry, when it faces the next collapse in demand for its product, will again be the beneficiary of a taxpayer-financed insurance policy against financial collapse.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Wednesday’s Headlines Are Graded on a Curve

Maybe one reason the U.S. has so many traffic deaths is that it's so easy to get a driver's license compared to other countries.

November 12, 2025

GOP Pol: ‘No Money for Bikes or Walking’ in Fed Transportation Bill

The outlook for active transportation won't be good if advocates don't stand up.

November 12, 2025

Mobility in Rural America: How India’s Popular Transportation Can Be A Model For US Transit Deserts

Lower ridership after Covid, combined with ongoing transit budget cuts, has caused a significant decrease in frequent and reliable public transit service for small and rural communities. Here's one way to fill the gap.

November 11, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Are Burning Up

On climate change, the gap is growing between what governments are promising and doing, and neither is enough.

November 11, 2025

We Haven’t Saved Transit Yet: What Comes After Chicago’s Fiscal Cliff

On its own, more funding averts short-term disaster, but does nothing to solve our longer term transit issues. And while the governance reforms could lead to better service, there’s no guarantee of that.

November 10, 2025
See all posts