Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Auto Makers

GM Bailout Will Cost Taxpayers as Much as $12 Billion

"Government Motors" no more. The federal government is calling in its loans to General Motors, which received a taxpayer-funded injection of almost $50 billion at the height of the financial meltdown in 2008.

The auto bailout cost taxpayers a bundle, but it helped Obama win reelection. Photo: ##http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/12/19/its-official-taxpayers-will-lose-big-on-the-gm-bailout## U.S. News and World Report##

Over the next 12 to 15 months, President Obama says the world's largest automaker, which has been turning a healthy profit since 2010, must buy back its remaining 500 million shares from the government. But, unlike the bank bailouts, the government rescue of GM won't result in a payout for its taxpaying saviors.

The federal government will receive only the going share prices, currently about $27, for its investment -- about half of the purchase price of roughly $54 a share. US News and World Report estimates the bailout of GM will cost taxpayers between $10 and $12 billion.

So, chalk up another big subsidy for driving. Taxpayers also lost $1.3 billion on the bailout of Chrysler. And then there was the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program -- another stimulus-era subsidy for the auto industry.

There's a fair argument to be made that the economic fallout from the dissolution of General Motors -- which employs 202,000 people worldwide -- during the lowest point of the worst recession in generations would have been disastrous. But the $10-$12 billion bailout is another indication of the high cost of America's auto dependence.

Remember, this wasn’t the first time U.S. taxpayers bailed out the domestic auto industry. In 1980, Chrysler — reeling from the U.S. oil embargo — received $1.5 billion from the government. It will be interesting to see whether the American auto industry, when it faces the next collapse in demand for its product, will again be the beneficiary of a taxpayer-financed insurance policy against financial collapse.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Monday’s Headlines Were Caught on Tape

Eight states prohibit the use of speed cameras, and more could join them. The cameras work, but maybe banning them would encourage cities to focus on street design rather than enforcement.

March 3, 2025

Sean Duffy Makes Propaganda Film In Failed Attempt To Show Congestion Pricing Doesn’t Work

The Secretary is doubling down on the Trump administration's mistaken view that the toll is ineffective and a "cash grab" from "hard-working New Yorkers." Is it too much to ask that he clean off the camera lens?

February 28, 2025

SF Drivers Declare Open Season on Parklets

Maybe rubber stops and reflectors aren't enough?

February 28, 2025

Friday Video: The Untold Story Behind the Paris Bike Boom

Yes, Anne Hidalgo deserves a lot of the credit — but the unsung heroes are the advocates who pushed her to do more.

February 28, 2025
See all posts