A “Movement For Movement” Puts Walking Front and Center

Six weeks after my daughter was born, my midwife asked me if I was getting any exercise. I confessed I wasn’t. I hadn’t figured out a new routine that included exercise, my old activities weren’t baby-friendly, I just didn’t have the time, and I wasn’t up for anything high-impact.

Photo: ##http://hollywoodwalker.blogspot.com/2012/06/walking-city-walk.html##Hollywood Walker##

She recommended I try walking for 20 minutes a day.

“Oh that,” I said. “I do that.” As a car-free family with a baby too little to ride a bike, all we ever did anymore was walk – far more than 20 minutes most days. It just hadn’t occurred to me that it counted as exercise.

This “unintentional walking,” as walkability evangelist Chris Leinberger calls it, is the key to getting more people active. At a day-long conference yesterday on pedestrian advocacy, Jane Ward of the George Washington School of Public Health made this sensible point:

We can’t be successful with the majority of the population if walking is something stuck on to a list what people are already doing. I think most people know that they should be getting more exercise, but if they think they have to make time in their already too-busy day, they’re not going to do it.

So, I think to focus on the useful walk, and walking as active transportation that should have equal consideration in transportation planning, with all other modes of transportation, is the way that we will reach the most people.

Yesterday’s conference was sponsored by a diverse group: the health care provider Kaiser Permanente, the American College of Sports Medicine, the Safe Routes to School National Partnership, Everybody Walk!, and America Walks. It was held at Kaiser’s DC headquarters, home to a huge, two-sided, interactive digital wall with information on walking.

Walking’s health connection can’t be overstated. “Being physically active is the most important thing all Americans of all ages and weights can do for health,” said Joan Dorn of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “We recognize the benefits of all kinds of physical activity, but we picked walking as an area on which to focus because it’s something that almost all Americans can do.”

A person’s risk of developing chronic health problems like heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure rises with inactivity. Walking can help people lose weight and can help seniors prevent falls. And it can do some things no one would expect.

Bob Sallis of the American College of Sports Medicine tells the story of Valerie, a patient with Parkinson’s disease. “She came in on a walker,” he said, “extremely frail, obviously depressed.” She had tried every medication and had just about given up. Sallis convinced her to see a fitness professional who started her walking on a treadmill at 1 mph. At first, they had to hold onto her.

Three weeks later she came into Sallis’s office “without the walker, makeup on, a completely different patient.”

“She had been transformed just by getting out and walking,” Sallis said. “And it occurred to me: If this had been a pill or a surgical procedure, this would have been on 60 Minutes. Everybody would have wanted to get a hold of this pill that so transformed this patient.”

Stories like this help you understand why Sallis’s motto is: “Exercise is medicine.” His crusade is to get physicians to write prescriptions for a 30-minute walk as readily as they write a prescription for Lipitor.

While 62 percent of adults reported walking either for leisure or transportation in 2010, up 6.3 percent from five years before, only 48 percent of adults meet federal guidelines for physical activity.

Walking has many benefits beyond health. As Tyler Norris of Kaiser’s Center for Total Health put it: “It is said that a good solution solves many problems — and walking is a good solution.” To make that solution work, much of the disastrous urban planning of the post-war period will have to be reversed. Planner Jeff Speck brought that point home, reading an excerpt from his new book, The Walkable City:

City engineers, worshipping the twin gods of smooth traffic and ample parking, have turned our downtowns into places that are easy to get to but not worth arriving at. Outdated zoning and building codes, often imported from the suburbs, have matched the uninviting streetscape with equally antisocial private buildings completing a public realm that is unsafe, uncomfortable and just plain boring.

Planners are coming around, Speck said. They were 20 years behind urbanist pioneer Jane Jacobs, but by 1980, most planners understood the importance of walkability. The problem is, he said, “the planners were so wrong for so many years that now that they’re mostly right, they’re mostly ignored.”

With the U.S. population expected to grow by 100 million people over the next 40 years, the scope of the problem is urgent. The idea that all those people will be accommodated by building more highways is dangerous. The country needs to invest in more efficient means of mobility.

Walking is also the great social equalizer. Gil Peñalosa of 8-80 Cities made this impassioned (and poetic) plea:

Walking, as well as cycling, is not a joke. This is not a frivolity. It’s the only mode of individual mobility for children and youth all over the world — and for most adults as well. So walking should be a human right, unless we think the only people who have the right to individual mobility are those who have the money and the age to drive cars.

And finally, I think the social issue of equality is tremendously important. We see nice sidewalks here [in Washington, DC]. But in most cities across the U.S., we see beautiful roads and horrible sidewalks, full of barriers and different levels and posts and broken and dangerous intersections. So we are constantly telling people, implicitly, the pedestrian is a second-class citizen. So in the back of their minds, the people that are walking are always thinking, ‘Someday, I’m going to have a car.’

So we have to have fantastic walking facilities, half because it’s going to be safe and the other half because we need to dignify the pedestrian.

The gathering at Kaiser was part of a growing advocacy effort focused on walkability. Last week, Sam Schwartz Engineering and America Walks launched Walksteps.org, the online home of their new guide, Steps to a Walkable Community: A Guide for Citizens, Planners, and Engineers, full of “pro-walking tactics and case studies that have successfully improved and encouraged walking in communities around North America.” The working groups at yesterday’s conference are expected to meet again in January, and a national conference is being organized for next fall.

4 thoughts on A “Movement For Movement” Puts Walking Front and Center

  1. Thanks for the post Tanya! Too often walking is left out of the toolkit of solutions–yet it is one of the easier things to do and we need to do more of it and we need to design our environments for walking! How does one find out about the national conference?

  2. Thanks for the post Tanya! Too often walking is left out of the toolkit of solutions–yet it is one of the easier things to do and we need to do more of it and we need to design our environments for walking! How does one find out about the national conference?

  3. I like the idea of “unintentional walking,” as it implies such a complex set of ideas. 
    One could look at the urban planning aspect, which requires intentional layouts which facilitate transport by foot; the public health aspect, which has shown clear links between walking and healthy populations; and the social aspect, where communities become more tightly knit by spending more time in each other’s presence. 
    There are so many benefits–and requirements–for a successful and walkable community, thank you for helping to develop ideas on how to best achieve this loft goal. 

  4. I’m a long-time transit user. One trick I use to increase my daily walking is to shift my  boarding point from a nearby bus stop (two blocks / eighth of a mile) to an LRV stop that is over a half mile away. Another is to make my grocery shopping bi-modal – walk a mile and a third to the store and take the bus back.

    I’m also in the habit of walking a block or two up-route so as to increase my chances of getting a seat after shopping (e.g. SFMuni’s #43 line with stops at Geary and Masonic [often mobbed] vs. the previous stop at Geary and Presidio). Also, a good question to ask oneself is “Do I want wait ten to fifteen (10-15) minutes for a ride that I can match with a five or so minute walk ?”. My usual answer is to start hoofing.

    P.S. [Not so ancient history] One source of low-stress exercise is to board / alight a stop or two away from your point of closest approach in one’s daily commute and walk the rest of the way to work. Granted, you might wind up passing a killer bakery / donut / bagel shop on the way but that’s what will power is for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Going Car-Free in a Car-Centric City

There are those who are blessed to live in a city with a variety of convenient transit options. For the rest of us, car ownership can feel like a mandate — regardless of how much we dream of setting off each day with nothing but a fare card in our pockets. Of course no matter […]

Driven to Distraction in America

A couple of weeks ago I left the transit-rich confines of New York City and headed down South to visit family. I made it all the way to Meridian, Mississippi, without getting in a car (I rode the subway to Penn Station and took Amtrak from there), but once I got off the train in […]

Are Dense Urban Neighborhoods More Resilient During Natural Disasters?

As the country watches Hurricane Isaac’s massive spiral head straight for the Gulf Coast, we are all experiencing post-traumatic symptoms of Katrina, which, seven years ago today, was heading for the same target. But I’m also remembering a severe weather event that hit closer to home (for me) somewhat more recently: Snowpocalypse, followed by Snowmageddon, […]